If you fell for WMD, you likely...

Iraq invasion. It's time to call him what he is: 'A liar.'
George W. Bush on the phone.

Eric Draper/National Archives
MS
Mattathias Schwartz
Mar 20, 2023, 5:48 PM PDT


Read in app
HOMEPAGE
Subscribe

Two former CIA officials spoke to Insider before the 20th anniversary of the US invasion of Iraq. They gave a firsthand account of the George W. Bush administration's attempts to misrepresent intelligence and assert a connection between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda. In fact, the evidence assembled by the CIA suggested that no such connection existed.

One of these false connections was a supposed meeting that had occurred between Mohamed Atta, the chief 9/11 hijacker, and Iraqi intelligence agents in Prague. In December 2001, then-Vice President Dick Cheney went on "Meet the Press" and falsely claimed that the meeting was "pretty well confirmed." A 2003 CIA cable states that "not one" official within the US government had evidence that the Prague meeting actually happened. Nevertheless, it became a key part of the administration's public case for launching the Iraq invasion on March 20, 2003, a conflict that would cost an estimated 300,000 lives.
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_Street_memo




Downing Street memo
Article Talk
Language
Watch
Edit
The Downing Street memo (or the Downing Street Minutes), sometimes described by critics of the Iraq War as the smoking gun memo, is the note of a 23 July 2002 secret meeting[1][2] of senior British government, defence and intelligence figures discussing the build-up to the war, which included direct reference to classified United States policy of the time. The name refers to 10 Downing Street, the residence of the British prime minister.

The memo, written by Downing Street foreign policy aide Matthew Rycroft, recorded the head of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) as expressing the view following his recent visit to Washington that "[George W.] Bush wanted to remove Saddam Hussein, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy." It quoted Foreign Secretary Jack Straw as saying it was clear that Bush had "made up his mind" to take military action but that "the case was thin." Straw also noted that Iraq retained "WMD capability" and that "Saddam would continue to play hard-ball with the UN." The military asked about the consequences "if Saddam used WMD on day one," posing Kuwait or Israel as potential targets. Attorney-General Lord Goldsmith warned that justifying the invasion on legal grounds would be difficult. However, the meeting took place several months before the adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441, the resolution eventually used as the legal basis for the invasion of Iraq. UNR687 also provided a pre-existing basis, as it required Iraq to divest itself of "100%" of all WMD capacity, which the Memo agreed it had not.

A copy of the memo was obtained by British journalist Michael Smith and published in The Sunday Times in May 2005, on the eve of British elections. Smith stated that the memo was equivalent to the Pentagon Papers which exposed American intentions in the Vietnam War and alleged the American media did not report more about it due to a perceived bias towards support for the war.[3] Though its authenticity has never been seriously challenged, the British and American governments have stated that the contents do not accurately reflect their official policy positions at the time.
 
volsrock said:
Link

And did he alter France and UKs intel on it
Click to expand...

You're fulfilling all of my predictions about Iraq.

When your side was calling all of the people who were correct about it "traitors" and saying Dems were on the "wrong side of history," I was saying that it would only be a matter of time before war cheerleaders denied that they were for it, and tried to "share the credit" with Democrats.
 
They are not honest brokers on anything



It’s how you can tell they are disinformation programs


They hate all truth


It’s how their maker wrote them
 
Jarod said:
I would not ask for Hamas to be spared if there were zero babies. The babies is not a part of the equation for me.

I do ask that the innocent Palestinians be spared, and I ask that Israel have a long term plan for Gaza. I ask that they learn from the Republicans mistake in Iraq.
Click to expand...

hasn't Gaza rejected reasonable long term plans for Gaza?.....perhaps you should hope Gaza learms from Gaza's mistakes in Gaza.....
 
Jarod said:
If you fell for WMD, you probably criticize people who are waiting for evidence before they believe the story about 50 decapitated babies.

I bet you are a Trumpper.
Click to expand...

You're also likely to believe:
Trump won the 2020 election
9/11 was an inside job
Antifa was behind Jan 6
The moon landing never happened
Santa Claus is real and living at the North Pole with his wife and elves.
 
evince said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/199...bing of Iraq,had ordered strikes against Iraq.

The 1998 bombing of Iraq (code-named Operation Desert Fox) was a major four-day bombing campaign on Iraqi targets from 16 to 19 December 1998, by the United States and the United Kingdom. On 16 December 1998, Bill Clinton announced that he had ordered strikes against Iraq. The strikes were launched as a result of Iraq's failure to comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions and its interference with United Nations Special Commission inspectors who were looking for weapons of mass destruction. The inspectors had been sent in 1997 and were repeatedly refused access to certain sites, thus compelling[according to whom?] the U.S. to launch strikes.
Click to expand...

They called this "wagging the dog" and claimed Clinton was just trying to distract from the Lewinsky controversy.
 
Jarod said:
So… What’s the connection, people who fell for Bushes WMD and Trumpists? What is it that makes them fall for lies so quickly?
Click to expand...

As far as WMDs, bush not only claimed the Iraq had them, he claimed the US was under "imminent threat" from them. He scared the bejesus out of fearful people who were susceptible to his lies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top