If we won the Iraq war over a month ago, why is Hormuz still open and why are they unable to negotiate an end to the war?

That’s all you have to comment on, I typed a similar word over the correct one?
That’s all you got?Are you drunk? Not only is the thread titled if we won the war a YEAR ago,....then you follow up by thinking were in the IRAQ war?
You're such a fool. Also you're so very, disgustingly fat, blimpie!Are you drunk? Not only is the thread titled if we won the war a YEAR ago,....then you follow up by thinking were in the IRAQ war?
I accept your concession.You're such a fool. Also you're so very, disgustingly fat, blimpie!
STILL no sales huh? Maybe the problem is YOU? Might be time for some self reflection on your part. I just don't think you are Kirby Man material. You may try becoming a Fuller brush man,....or one of those guys who jumps out at a stop light and washes your windows for some change,....you might have better luck.You're such a fool. Also you're so very, disgustingly fat, blimpie!
Oh I forgot- you're also a loser.Trump's U.N. Ambassador Mike Waltz says bombing every bridge and power plant in Iran wouldn't be a war crime
He is incorrect.
Deliberately bombing civilian infrastructure like bridges and power plants is a war crime under international humanitarian law.
- Laws governing this include the laws of armed conflict (international humanitarian law), principally the Hague Conventions and the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols.
- Even if a target is a military objective, an attack is unlawful if the expected incidental civilian harm (death, injury, damage to civilian objects) would be excessive compared to the anticipated concrete and direct military advantage.
- Perfidy and indiscriminate attacks: Deliberate or indiscriminate attacks that cannot be directed at a specific military objective are prohibited.
- Serious violations: Grave breaches or serious violations (e.g., intentionally directing attacks against civilians) can amount to war crimes and give rise to individual criminal responsibility (prosecution by national courts, international tribunals, or the ICC where jurisdiction exists).
- If the campaign intentionally targets civilian infrastructure with no clear, concrete military necessity and causes widespread civilian harm (blackouts, harm to hospitals/water/sanitation), it would violate distinction and proportionality and therefore constitute war crimes.
- Attacking protected objects, causing starvation of civilians by depriving them of essentials and state/command responsibility for planning or ordering such attacks render Trump and his soldiers liable to prosecution.
You continue to post mindless drivel.If we won the Iran war over a month ago, why is Hormuz still open and why are they unable to negotiate an end to the war?
False, you can’t handle the truth.You continue to post mindless drivel.
That's not how you say it.False, you can’t handle the truth.
Well, if you can redefine the word “win” to fit any circumstances you want it’s easy, reality doesn’t matter, it’s what you call itIf we won the Iran war over a month ago, why is Hormuz still open and why are they unable to negotiate an end to the war?
Everybody wins, Trump will claim another participation trophy.Well, if you can redefine the word “win” to fit any circumstances you want it’s easy, reality doesn’t matter, it’s what you call it
Trump said six weeks ago he would only accept unconditional surrender. Why is he inviting the radical regime to negotiate?If we won the Iran war over a month ago, why is Hormuz still open and why are they unable to negotiate an end to the war?