If Trump was implicated in wrongdoing in the Epstein files, how come Obama or Biden never exposed them?

[Diogenes]

Not conveniant. Factual.

So you keep saying.

You are denying Larry Summers, Prince Andrew and Bill Gates and others are facing any consequences for the implications they face from the Epstein files.

When did I supposedly do that?

You are then demanding i educate you on it while refusing to educate yourself on what is CURRENT news.

Was I? I feel certain I asked you to provide evidence to substantiate a claim you made; to wit:

Sorry but you refusing to take responsibility for yourself and get off magat media and thus not seeing current news is on you.

Post the proof.

The rich powerful donors who were in the Epstein files were desired by both parties which was why no DoJ since GWB.Sr wanted to touch those files. There was no partisan gains to be made as both houses would be burned.

Maybe. Maybe not.

 

[QP!]

So you keep saying.




When did I supposedly do that?



Was I? I feel certain I asked you to provide evidence to substantiate a claim you made; to wit:




Post the proof.



Maybe. Maybe not.

You "supposed that" when you said i needed to prove that anyone but Trump was implicated in the Epstein files and you demanded proof of that.

Do you now deny that and accept others were implicated?

 

[Diogenes]

You "supposed that" when you said i needed to prove that anyone but Trump was implicated in the Epstein files and you demanded proof of that.

Is that a fact? Quote the alleged post you've attributed to me, please.

Do you now deny that and accept others were implicated?

Implicated in what? Wrongdoing?

 

[QP!]

Is that a fact? Quote the alleged post you've attributed to me, please.



Implicated in what? Wrongdoing?

Back peddling away from what you said i see.

My post claiming 'other powerful people have been implicated on both sides'...

Naw you can educate yourself if you need convincing that Bill Clinton and other powerful people on both sides would be implicated and this would not have remained contained to Trump only or remained partisan

Your post denying it...

No proof, no truth.

Your assertion is therefore speculative, as previously noted.

 

[Diogenes]

Back peddling away from what you said i see.

My IP and all that follow are there to see.

My post claiming 'other powerful people have been implicated on both sides'... Your post denying it...

I don't recall denying that 'other powerful people have been implicated on both sides', so refresh my memory.

Link up.

 

[QP!]

My IP and all that follow are there to see.



I don't recall denying that 'other powerful people have been implicated on both sides', so refresh my memory.

Link up.

i already did above with you demanding i prove it or you saying it was not true.

 

[QP!]

My IP and all that follow are there to see.



I don't recall denying that 'other powerful people have been implicated on both sides', so refresh my memory.

Link up.

So do you now accept or admit that 'other powerful people have been implicated on both sides'?

 

[Diogenes]

i already did above with you demanding i prove it or you saying it was not true.

Where? I see no quotes of mine that indicate "back-pedalaing" in your responses.

 

[Diogenes]

So do you now accept or admit that 'other powerful people have been implicated on both sides'?

I never contested that assertion. It's not even debatable.

 

[QP!]

I never contested that assertion. It's not even debatable.

so you agree that other powerful people have been implicated?

 

[Diogenes]

so you agree that other powerful people have been implicated?

Can you read?

I never contested that assertion. It's not even debatable.

 

[QP!]

Can you read?

SO do you AGREE that powerful people have been implicated?

I know language is difficult for you being stupid and all but 'not contesting' does not necessarily mean you agree. It just means you are not denying it at this point.

So to ensure no more back peddling by you, you will have to be clear.

 

[Diogenes]

SO do you AGREE that powerful people have been implicated?

I know language is difficult for you being stupid and all but 'not contesting' does not necessarily mean you agree. It just means you are not denying it at this point.

So to ensure no more back peddling by you, you will have to be clear.

Jesus wept.

 

[QP!]

Jesus wept.

yes at your need to back peddle and not be clear about what you did and did not say.

Why are you so frightened to be clear on this point?

is it because you only watch magat media and you can not actual say 'yes i agree other powerful have been implicated' and that is why you just do not want to contest it just in case i do provide the proof to you?

 

[QP!]

Did Jesus tell you that, or did you just make it up and decide it was a "fact"?



I refer you back to my former response.



I think we're done here.

Thread 'An announcement for the denizens'

Nov 7, 2025

​

Effective immediately, stupid shit posted in my glorious threads will no longer be worthy of my valuable time for the immediate future.

I reserve the right to read your ignorant nonsense and roll my eyes, however.

If you post stupid shit in one of my threads and you don't get a reply from me, let this announcement serve as your notice and the only explanation you're going to get.

Your "thoughts" are beneath my contempt.

If you think this is directed at you, it probably is.

As...

• Diogenes
• Replies: 0
• Forum: Introductions, User Announcements, Suggestions and

and with that surrender Diogenes back peddles away from his prior position in defeat...

My work here is done!

 

[Diogenes]

and with that surrender Diogenes back peddles away from his prior position in defeat... My work here is done!

.

 

[QP!]

.

And he does another back peddle coming back to reply after saying he would not reply.

I have him trapped in doom loop he is too stupid to get out of and too cowardly to own his own back peddling.

 

[Diogenes]

And he does another back peddle coming back to reply after saying he would not reply. I have him trapped in doom loop he is too stupid to get out of and too cowardly to own his own back peddling.

LOL.

 

[Diogenes]

If you do not vote that means you can be presumed to have tacitly acknowledged that Trump was never implicated in wrongdoing in the Epstein files.

 

[QP!]

If you do not vote that means you can be presumed to have tacitly acknowledged that Trump was never implicated in wrongdoing in the Epstein files.

Diogenes already admitted defeat on this topic and that it was stupid. No need to vote.

He is in constant back peddle mode now, switching between admitting his mistake and then pretending he did not make one. Nothing more.