If TACO wants the files released, why does Congress need to vote?

It’s OK to use AI, but check the bias. In fact might be a good idea to tell it not to give you answers slanted towards what it thinks about you.
I know it is ok to use AI. I wouldn't be ashamed if I had. However I do well writing. It is a large portion of my job. I wrote this like I write emails going to a larger group of people. Using bullet points and paragraphs, which reaches a larger group of people as some will not read the "wall of text" and want the bullet points, others want it to be more writing less bullet point...

Anyway. When managing information within a larger group of people you write differently, usually this way.

I get that you do not like what I wrote, and you want it to be AI. Maybe because you do not do as well, I do not know.
 
I know it is ok to use AI. I wouldn't be ashamed if I had. However I do well writing. It is a large portion of my job. I wrote this like I write emails going to a larger group of people. Using bullet points and paragraphs, which reaches a larger group of people as some will not read the "wall of text" and want the bullet points, others want it to be more writing less bullet point...

Anyway. When managing information within a larger group of people you write differently, usually this way.

I get that you do not like what I wrote, and you want it to be AI. Maybe because you do not do as well, I do not know.
Ok.. but check the AI bias when you do use it.
 
Sure. I'll "check" the bias when I use it, papa Jarod... :rolleyes:
Just advice for the public, your post clearly exaggerated the limits of presidential power. There might be a very few pieces of the files TACO could not legally release right away.

We also know he has had his name redacted from the files.
 
Just advice for the public, your post clearly exaggerated the limits of presidential power. There might be a very few pieces of the files TACO could not legally release right away.

We also know he has had his name redacted from the files.
My God, you have a full half dozen OP's on this topic on the front page of this forum alone.
Sounds to me like you are couching all your sturm and drang over the Epstein case by claiming, if this turns out to be a nothingburger, it's because Trump personally had his name removed from everything?

Try to make it through one day by focusing on your phone bank calls instead of letting Trump dominate your life.
 
My God, you have a full half dozen OP's on this topic on the front page of this forum alone.
Sounds to me like you are couching all your sturm and drang over the Epstein case by claiming, if this turns out to be a nothingburger, it's because Trump personally had his name removed from everything?

Try to make it through one day by focusing on your phone bank calls instead of letting Trump dominate your life.
Is it not true?
 
Just advice for the public, your post clearly exaggerated the limits of presidential power. There might be a very few pieces of the files TACO could not legally release right away.

We also know he has had his name redacted from the files.
We know nothing of the sort. Maybe you should follow your own advice and check AI for your own bias before posting stuff... you know telling someone who doesn’t hide some bias of his own to "check" AI for bias... then saying this BS. Geebus.
 
It’s OK to use AI, but check the bias. In fact might be a good idea to tell it not to give you answers slanted towards what it thinks about you.

It’s designed to use confirmation bias, to make you feel good using it.
we literally come here to post our own opinions, then when you find out something "leans" toward my opinion you blame AI. weaksauce.
 
The Justice Department can release those files anytime TACO tells them to…. Remember, he is their boss!

So why does Congress have to vote to force them?

He’s still trying to avoid it, they will never get out.
Fucking dumbass

 
The Justice Department can release those files anytime TACO tells them to…. Remember, he is their boss!

So why does Congress have to vote to force them?

He’s still trying to avoid it, they will never get out.
Fucking dumbass

 
We know nothing of the sort. Maybe you should follow your own advice and check AI for your own bias before posting stuff... you know telling someone who doesn’t hide some bias of his own to "check" AI for bias... then saying this BS. Geebus.

"The FBI Redacted Trump’s Name in the Epstein Files​

The bureau’s FOIA team tasked with conducting a final review of the records blacked out the names before higher-ups said last month that releasing the documents ‘would not be appropriate or warranted.’" - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/news...in-files-trump-s-name-was-redacted-by-the-fbi
 
we literally come here to post our own opinions, then when you find out something "leans" toward my opinion you blame AI. weaksauce.
Its not about your own bias, it's about not telling the truth about facts.

There is a difference, otherwise, it's just a contest of magical thinking.
 
Fucking dumbass

Why is the measure necessary? He has that power himself without being ordered by Congress to do it.

Its basically him saying, 'vote to order me to do something I already have the power to do without your vote, but I won't unless ordered to do so.'
 

"The FBI Redacted Trump’s Name in the Epstein Files​

The bureau’s FOIA team tasked with conducting a final review of the records blacked out the names before higher-ups said last month that releasing the documents ‘would not be appropriate or warranted.’" - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/news...in-files-trump-s-name-was-redacted-by-the-fbi
What we know, is that some emails were released just days ago that had his name, you were all getting hyperexcited about how Epstein called Trump a bad guy, as if he is some awesome judge of character... someone that traffics in human flesh saying that someone else is a "bad guy"... <SMH>

So, this story is really already been proven false. Because actual information that was leaked recently... well, it contained that name you say was "redacted"...

Again, you should check that AI bias before you get them to find crap for you. It's way too easy to prove the story false. It's not something you should be embarrassed about using, but you should ask it to avoid your bias. I heard this from a friend.
 
What we know, is that some emails were released just days ago that had his name, you were all getting hyperexcited about how Epstein called Trump a bad guy...

So, this story is really already been proven false. Because actual information that was leaked recently... well, it contained that name you say was "redacted"...

Again, you should check that AI bias before you get them to find crap for you. It's way too easy to prove the story false.
The name was not redacted because that information did not come from the redacted FBI files. You are confusing two different sources of information. I am not hyperexcited, but I am happy bad people are outed. Even when they are Democrats.

I did not use AI to find that, it was on a readily available news site for anyone who wants to be informed about world events.
 
Back
Top