If Russia tried to influence our election

Yurt

Willin to be Chillin
How much more influence are the DNC trolls having or have had?

Just look at one poster on JPP who post, virtually all lies:

Reagansghost
 
How much more influence are the DNC trolls having or have had?

Just look at one poster on JPP who post, virtually all lies:

Reagansghost

What the hell are you talking about?

Russia did orchestra an espionage effort to interfere in our 2016 election, fact, and they also did it to assist one candidate, fact

If that Russian effort was sucessful is debatable, but they did do it, and one campaign eagerly met directly with those Russians with the plans to aquire Russian aid in the election, another fact

Now Trumpkins can attempt to overlook that as merely "opposition research," but traditionally seeking aid from a outside nation who historically is antagonistic toward the US was not acceptable under any circumstances, in fact, it was only a short time ago your side would have labeled it "unAmerican
 
The Russians, Chinese, Israelis, and Saudis, all try to manipulate our Elections. We should all be aware of that and learn how to recognize it.
 
what did the Internet Research Agency spend? it was like 1 million over a couple months
( and compare that to the massive aid we gave Yeltsin - campaign coaching etc.)

The whole thing was blown up with Russiaphobia -Trump kicked them out of Seattle,and that should have been a proportionate response -instead we have utterly destroyed all diplomatic relations and went goofy with sanctions.

which has real world consequences -none of which are good for the USA
 
“Rosenstein repeatedly emphasized that in this particular indictment, there is no allegation that these operatives had any effect on the outcome of the election. He also highlighted that Friday’s indictment does not allege that any American knowingly participated in the Russian operation.”

Case closed. Ya esta.
 
Deputy AG Rosenstein: “No evidence election results were impacted.”

Kind of funny given a year ago the right had Rosenstein portrayed as a slimy, dishonest, rat who hated Trump, and now he is the pillar of credibility

Let's see, Rosenstein was appointed by Trump, he authored the letter Trump used to fire Comey, he works under Barr, and Barr, who is now telling us he is going to investigate the investigators, will be thusly examining Rosenstein. Did you think he would do anything to piss of Barr at this point?
 
“Rosenstein repeatedly emphasized that in this particular indictment, there is no allegation that these operatives had any effect on the outcome of the election. He also highlighted that Friday’s indictment does not allege that any American knowingly participated in the Russian operation.”

Case closed. Ya esta.

Seems "earl" can't read;

If that Russian effort was sucessful is debatable, but they did do it, and one campaign eagerly met directly with those Russians with the plans to aquire Russian aid in the election, another fact

Now Trumpkins can attempt to overlook that as merely "opposition research," but traditionally seeking aid from a outside nation who historically is antagonistic toward the US was not acceptable under any circumstances, in fact, it was only a short time ago your side would have labeled it "unAmerican
 
what did the Internet Research Agency spend? it was like 1 million over a couple months
( and compare that to the massive aid we gave Yeltsin - campaign coaching etc.)

The whole thing was blown up with Russiaphobia -Trump kicked them out of Seattle,and that should have been a proportionate response -instead we have utterly destroyed all diplomatic relations and went goofy with sanctions.

which has real world consequences -none of which are good for the USA

Another one who seemingly refuses to accept facts, Russia is not a friend of the US, quite the opposite, they interfered in our election, and the top leaders of one of the candidates in that election eagerly met more than once with Russians looking to get Russian aid for thier candidate in our election.

As I keep saying, those that dismiss those facts today would have quickly labeled them unAmerican prior to 2016
 
How much more influence are the DNC trolls having or have had?

Just look at one poster on JPP who post, virtually all lies:

Reagansghost

Yes. We're supposed to believe that a couple hundred thousand dollars of online advertisements and internet posts influenced the election more than the entire liberal media complex, hollywood, and highly funded political campaigns.

It's absurd. Canada and the UK were puting anti-Trump documentaries out on their state-run television during the election. Election interference? Nope. No part of any election occurs on social media or on Television. The notion they "influenced the election" is absurd.
 
The Russians, Chinese, Israelis, and Saudis, all try to manipulate our Elections. We should all be aware of that and learn how to recognize it.

So what do you think should be the consequences if a candidate or his staff is documented as meeting with the Russians, Chinese, Israelis, or Saudis with the intent of getting help from those parties in the elections?

From what the right is telling us, it would be just "opposition research," so no big deal
 
Kind of funny given a year ago the right had Rosenstein portrayed as a slimy, dishonest, rat who hated Trump, and now he is the pillar of credibility

Let's see, Rosenstein was appointed by Trump, he authored the letter Trump used to fire Comey, he works under Barr, and Barr, who is now telling us he is going to investigate the investigators, will be thusly examining Rosenstein. Did you think he would do anything to piss of Barr at this point?
Rosenweasel was antagonistic to Trump -no he's still not credible in his role of signing the FISA,or the SC appointment.

But the indictments are another matter, and common sense says the Russians had no impact on votes
 
Yes. We're supposed to believe that a couple hundred thousand dollars of online advertisements and internet posts influenced the election more than the entire liberal media complex, hollywood, and highly funded political campaigns.

It's absurd. Canada and the UK were puting anti-Trump documentaries out on their state-run television during the election. Election interference? Nope. No part of any election occurs on social media or on Television. The notion they "influenced the election" is absurd.

Another one who can't read;

If that Russian effort was sucessful is debatable, but they did do it, and one campaign eagerly met directly with those Russians with the plans to aquire Russian aid in the election, a fact

Now Trumpkins can attempt to overlook that as merely "opposition research," but traditionally seeking aid from a outside nation who historically is antagonistic toward the US was not acceptable under any circumstances, in fact, it was only a short time ago your side would have labeled it "unAmerican
 
So what do you think should be the consequences if a candidate or his staff is documented as meeting with the Russians, Chinese, Israelis, or Saudis with the intent of getting help from those parties in the elections?

From what the right is telling us, it would be just "opposition research," so no big deal
consequences for what law is broken?
is there a CFR violation in there? I don't even see that unless there is in kind contributions or something
 
Another one who can't read;

If that Russian effort was sucessful is debatable, but they did do it, and one campaign eagerly met directly with those Russians with the plans to aquire Russian aid in the election, a fact

Now Trumpkins can attempt to overlook that as merely "opposition research," but traditionally seeking aid from a outside nation who historically is antagonistic toward the US was not acceptable under any circumstances, in fact, it was only a short time ago your side would have labeled it "unAmerican

Another one who can't spell.

Yes, Christopher Steele used sources within Russian intelligence to author his dodgy dossier, which was funded by the DNC. That's a fact. How does this fit into your little narrative?
 
Seems "earl" can't read;

If that Russian effort was sucessful is debatable, but they did do it, and one campaign eagerly met directly with those Russians with the plans to aquire Russian aid in the election, another fact

Now Trumpkins can attempt to overlook that as merely "opposition research," but traditionally seeking aid from a outside nation who historically is antagonistic toward the US was not acceptable under any circumstances, in fact, it was only a short time ago your side would have labeled it "unAmerican
Seems archives can’t read

“Earl” is a proper name, upper case required.

“No election results impacted.”
 
Rosenweasel was antagonistic to Trump -no he's still not credible in his role of signing the FISA,or the SC appointment.

But the indictments are another matter, and common sense says the Russians had no impact on votes

Doesn't matter if they had an immediate impact, the fact remains the leaders of the Trump campaign eagerly met with the Russians with the sole intent to get their help for their candidate. Last I knew, Russia wasn't an ally of the US, actually, the exact opposite, it can't be easily dismissed as just "opposition research," you don't invite enemies into your election
 
Back
Top