zappasguitar
Well-known member
Really that's all one can say to a retarded poster like that.![]()
Right...because you've both shown time after time you can't debate the facts of the matter.
Really that's all one can say to a retarded poster like that.![]()
Right...because you've both shown time after time you can't debate the facts of the matter.
Did you like the Carter economy?Reagan signed the bills, and also raised taxes. Six times, wasn't it?
Did you like the Carter economy?![]()
No I did. Did you like the Carter economy? It's a simple yes or no question.Did I say that?
Irony:
When have you ever debated, Zippy?
No I did. Did you like the Carter economy? It's a simple yes or no question.
You misunderstood. I asked you if you liked the Carter economy. Again, it's a simple question, only requiring a simple yes or no answer.You said that you liked the Carter economy? When?
You misunderstood. I asked you if you liked the Carter economy. Again, it's a simple question, only requiring a simple yes or no answer.
Did you like the Carter economy?![]()
Did I say that?
No I did. Did you like the Carter economy? It's a simple yes or no question.
When unemployment got to 7.8%% by January 2009, it was still worse than when Bush took office.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_policy_of_the_George_W._Bush_administration#Unemployment
The first major economic initiative pursued by Bush was a massive tax cut for the rich, enacted in June of 2001.
Those with incomes over a million got a tax cut of $18,000—more than 30 times larger than the cut received by the average American.
The inequities were compounded by a second tax cut, in 2003, this one skewed even more heavily toward the rich.
Together these tax cuts, when fully implemented and if made permanent, mean that in 2012 the average reduction for an American in the bottom 20 percent was a scant $45, while those with incomes of more than $1 million saw their tax bills reduced by an average of $162,000.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/12/bush200712