If Janet Reno had 'summarized' Starr's Watergate Report no big deal, eh?

[tinfoil]

How will you vote in 2020

not sure yet. I'm in a red zone so my vote won't matter much anyway.

 

[reagansghost]

so if Janet Reno had 'summarized' Starr's Watergate Report and found Clinton innocent of any crimes no big deal, eh bagheads?

 

[reagansghost]

crickets

 

[rjhenn]

It might help if you knew what the fuck you were talking about dumb ass. What link did I post?

Embarrassed much?

A tiny bit. Sorry, you quoted a post by Legion, which contained a broken link.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

I hate Trump as a person, but I love how he's driven the left bonkers. It's so fun to watch.

It's so fun to watch him tear down the country?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

so if Janet Reno had 'summarized' Starr's Watergate Report and found Clinton innocent of any crimes no big deal, eh bagheads?

Clinton's only "crime' was a little extra-marital noncoital sex. Trump's done a lot worse and his cultists just act like it doesn't matter. So much for any claim to be Christians.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[reagansghost]

well I guess that settles it, Clinton should have ordered Reno to keep Starr's Whitewater report secret and instead release a short summary absolving him of any crime

missed opportunity!

 

[Flash]

the Congress actually impeached a president for lying on a deposition about an affair..........

And lying to a grand jury, attempted witness tampering, and attempted obstruction of justice

 

[Flash]

not sure yet. I'm in a red zone so my vote won't matter much anyway.

Me, too. That allows me to vote 3rd party without it affecting the state results.

 

[countryboy]

If Janet Reno had 'summarized' Starr's Watergate Report no big deal, eh?

Watergate report? Lol, fucking retard.