If I could give Mitt some advice for tonight, it would be this...

Superfreak said:
So, in short, what you are saying is that you are an idiot. Incapable of addressing the fact that the polls show that Romney is gaining ground with women? You are thus going to resort to your hate filled ranting? Good to know.
Click to expand...


Oh yeah, I forgot...any line of thought that runs counter to the koolaid you know-it-alls guzzle daily is immediately branded as "hate filled ranting" so you don't have to admit I was right once again.

I offered up my reasoning why what you allege in the polls may be true, that you don't agree isn't my problem.
 
Last edited:
Dixie said:
I don't think he needs to cry, Ronald Reagan never cried. What he needs to do, is nail Obama with poignant statements of indisputable truth. Reagan's was; "Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?" Romney needs to make an emotional connection with the people, it doesn't have to be "teary-eyed" or even on that emotional level. He just needs to speak with compassion and present a sense of vision, and like I said, nail Obama's ass with indisputable poignant truths.
Click to expand...
\

I think he should ask Obama if this is just more "Hope and Change", like 2008.
 
Romney is just doing fine in the debates. Lord knows he got enough practice during the interminably long Republican primary campaign. His Democratic opponent, on the other hand, had a day job. He's the one who needs advise.
 
Actually the first debate was too wonkish. Obama should exploit the fact that Romney has absolutely no streetsmarts and should bitch slap his ass.

Conversly, I'd like to see Romney sneer at Barry and inform him he's a social mushroom that doesn't know which fork to use.
 
Perhaps I should explain myself. I don't mean "cry" in the sense of tears running down his face, or balling like the Speaker of the House. I mean that he should allow his eyes to water a bit. Tell a story about a struggling family that has faced hardships over the last 4 years, and let 'em tear up. Then tell America what he's going to do about it. This wouldn't make him look weak at all. On the contrary, I think it would push him slightly ahead of Obama amongst female voters. I can't tell you how many times I got what I wanted from a woman by revealing my "sensitive" side. Hell, the first time I got laid was the night my uncle died. :)
 
Voltaire said:
Cry a little. Don't start blubbering à la Boehner, but tell a story and tear up a little. Do this, and you will effectively cancel out anything Obama has to say about abortion, and probably gain amongst women by a couple points.

That may sound ridiculous, but it's basically guaranteed to be effective.
Click to expand...

He would short circuit.

He should promise chocolate that causes weight loss. It fits in with his general theme.
 
cawacko said:
Please tell me if I'm wrong here but the phrase 'voting against one's own interests' means from a male perspective that unless you are rich or wealthy you should vote Democratic because they want to tax the rich higher and create more programs for the middle class while Republicans only support the rich and for women abortion is the big thing which is why voting Republican is voting against their own interest while Democrats will keep abortion legal for women?
Click to expand...

There are other women's issues besides abortion, like equal pay which should concern entrepreneurial women.
 
Last edited:
Voltaire said:
Perhaps I should explain myself. I don't mean "cry" in the sense of tears running down his face, or balling like the Speaker of the House. I mean that he should allow his eyes to water a bit. Tell a story about a struggling family that has faced hardships over the last 4 years, and let 'em tear up. Then tell America what he's going to do about it. This wouldn't make him look weak at all. On the contrary, I think it would push him slightly ahead of Obama amongst female voters. I can't tell you how many times I got what I wanted from a woman by revealing my "sensitive" side. Hell, the first time I got laid was the night my uncle died. :)
Click to expand...

You're presuming that a struggling family facing hardships would elicit an emotional response in a sociopath. Now that's funny!

:rofl2:
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Oh yeah, I forgot...any line of thought that runs counter to the koolaid you know-it-alls guzzle daily is immediately branded as "hate filled ranting" so you don't have to admit I was right once again.

I offered up my reasoning why what you allege in the polls may be true, that you don't agree isn't my problem.
Click to expand...

You posted the typical bullshit from the left. That only dumb 'barefoot and pregnant' women would vote for Republicans. You demonize and demean any woman who doesn't think and act like YOU think a woman should.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Romney is just doing fine in the debates. Lord knows he got enough practice during the interminably long Republican primary campaign. His Democratic opponent, on the other hand, had a day job. He's the one who needs advise.
Click to expand...

His 'day job' being going on the view and trying to hang with 'celebrities' to give the impression he is 'cool'?
 
Voltaire said:
The above isn't even a coherent sentence. What in christ's name are you trying to say?
Click to expand...

Not all women who vote for the GOP's anti-woman agenda are 'self-hating'. Many are simply idiots who've bought the lies. That's one of the ways that the Christian/caveman model of women as subservients has come in quite handy for the GOP.
 
Bijou said:
Not all women who vote for the GOP's anti-woman agenda are 'self-hating'. Many are simply idiots who've bought the lies. That's one of the ways that the Christian/caveman model of women as subservients has come in quite handy for the GOP.
Click to expand...

Uh... how is that relevant to my question, Bitchou?

You libs really are becoming unhinged. Seriously, seek help before the election. You're going to need it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top