If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

Just for funzies I went through to see how often Cy uses Google AI to make his points and in just a few seconds I found all these and this isn't even digging deeply in.

The Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics suggests that every time a quantum measurement occurs, the universe splits into multiple, parallel realities, or "worlds," where each possible outcome of the measurement becomes a separate reality. This interpretation eliminates the need for the observer-dependent wave function collapse, instead proposing that the entire universe, including observers, becomes entangled with the quantum system, leading to a split.
Google AI

"The Copenhagen interpretation is a philosophical stance on quantum mechanics that suggests that subatomic particles don't have definite properties until they are measured, and that the act of measurement causes the particle's wave function to 'collapse' into a single outcome"

Google AI

"The Copenhagen interpretation is a philosophical and physical framework for understanding quantum mechanics, emphasizing that a quantum particle exists in all possible states (superposition) until it is measured, at which point its state "collapses" into a single, definitive outcome. It challenges philosophical realism by suggesting that properties of quantum objects are not determinate until they are observed "

-Google AI

While not all zoologists study animal behavior, it is a significant and common focus, with fields like ethology specifically dedicated to it. Many zoologists study animal behavior as it is crucial for understanding their ecosystems, health, and conservation.
The focus on behavior: Studying behavior helps zoologists understand how animals communicate, interact, find food, and reproduce.
Why it's important: Research into animal behavior is essential for conservation efforts, as it helps inform strategies to protect endangered species and manage ecosystems, especially in the face of human impact.
-Google AI

"Chap" is a slang term that most commonly means a man or boy, particularly in British English. It is an informal and somewhat old-fashioned term, similar to "guy" or "fellow".

Google AI

"Paul's mission was sanctioned by the Jerusalem church leaders, particularly at the Council of Jerusalem (around AD 49) where Peter, James, and John accepted his ministry to the Gentiles." -- Google AI

Wu wei is a Taoist concept often translated as "effortless action" or "non-doing," which involves acting in a state of effortless alignment with the natural flow of the universe (the Tao) rather than forcing things. It is about responding with ease and awareness, avoiding ego-driven struggles, and letting actions flow naturally, much like water flowing around a rock. Achieving a state of wu wei can lead to reduced anxiety and greater clarity by allowing you to act in sync with a situation instead of fighting against it. -- Google AI

Wow, that's a LOT of Googlin'.

Pretty frantic actually.
 
beginning to annoy me because you're a liar. I didn't demean Christian arguments. I said they're irrational. You can be offended about that if you want, but it says a lot more about you than it does about me. I'm open to their arguments, but not believing their "faith" is not being hostile to their "faith".

Fuck you. I've already told you I was a Catholic for 20 years and have spent my entire life studying religion. If you say I investigated Christianity -- the one religion you're so determined to defend -- for 5 minutes one more time, I'm going to light your house on fire.

I called you irrational and illogical because you are. Cope.

What in the actual fuck are you talking about? You may as well be a MAGAt with your tenuous grasp on reality and obsessive compulsion to lie.

Dude, you've already written all of that. Multiple times. Don't repeat yourself to me. It confirms that you're boring and anti-intellectual.
I don't care if you called Christianity irrational.

This is a message board where people are free to disagree and give their opinion.
I gave us the reasons that I believe the classical arguments for god are rational, if not necessarily true.

You crossed a line when you started calling me irrational, and making judgments about me based on the gossip of a known liar and sock puppet.

Try calling your boss or clients irrational.

I never complain when anyone posts something true about Christianity - like sexual abuse in the church, or theocrats introducing biblical education. I contribute threads about that kind of Christian bullshit too.

But I'm entitled to respond when somebody writes something incorrect about religion. The original post in this thread was a ridiculous strawman.
 
Got a few more!

data source: Google AI

data source: Google AI

Google AI has the same interpretation of

According to Google AI

Google AI

According to Google AI,

- Google AI

Google AI

Google AI:

source credit: Google AI.

Cy, you use Google a LOT.

A LOT A LOT.

As in: TOO MUCH.

You really are a dimbulb aren't you??? I never realized HOW MUCH YOU GOOGLE!

WOW!
 
Hey @Cypress : if I were to do a similar analysis with regards to Wikipedia would I find a lot of hits from you frantically wiki-ing?

Why do you take people to task for frantic googling when it's obvious (I've shown now) that you do it all the time?

Don't you consider that hypocrisy? What about your vaunted "morality" that you blather on about all the time?
 
You are what he aspires to be which is why he's always trying to pull you down to his level.
That would explain the countless hours he and his other socks and aliases have spent over three years obsessively reading my posts, composing thousands of responses to me, and complaining relentlessly about me.

He probably needs a mental health intervention.
 
It's an insult.

The main difference is whether it's personal or not.

Example:
1. Believing there is or isn't a God is irrational since there's no evidence either way.
2. You're irrational.

It's hard to fathom anyone would attempt to claim calling someone irrational is not an insult.

I invited Diesel to try calling his clients or bosses irrational if he needs to test this.
 
ab06sl.jpg
 
It's hard to fathom anyone would attempt to claim calling someone irrational is not an insult.

Poor widdle Cypress. Stamp you widdle feet, Cy. Stamp them hard!

Make up names for the other poster. That usually makes you feel good.

I invited Diesel to try calling his clients or bosses irrational if he needs to test this.

Did he not give you an immediate answer, widdle Cypress?

Maybe you can ask Google AI why people don't give you your proper respect!
 
Cy uses Google AI
Those aren't examples of frantic googling.

Those are examples of you or someone else not believing what I wrote, and me having to give you an independent source confirming and corroborating what I wrote.

Frantic Googling is when you read a post I wrote about a topic you aren't familiar with, and you have to spend five minutes frantically googling to find some way to respond to my post.
 
Those aren't examples of frantic googling.

Those are examples of you or someone else not believing what I wrote, and me having to give you an independent source confirming and corroborating what I wrote.

Frantic Googling is when you read a post I wrote about a topic you aren't familiar with, and you have to spend five minutes frantically googling to find some way to respond to my post.
Sadly, low IQ people can't comprehend the difference. Perry is simply playing tit-for-tat for his previous stealing Google answers and claiming them as his own. He's not very bright. Sad.
 
Sadly, low IQ people can't comprehend the difference. Perry is simply playing tit-for-tat for his previous stealing Google answers and claiming them as his own. He's not very bright. Sad.
He's very angry at people who do the hard work of reading books, watching debates, podcasts, and lectures.

A frantic five minute Google search is about the amount of work Perry is willing to invest in self-education.
 
Back
Top