ZenMode
Well-known member
Of a god? How would they be?OK. Are ice cores "evidence"?
Of a god? How would they be?OK. Are ice cores "evidence"?
You still don't know what that means. Collisions, which are random, determine the movement of electrons. The more we know about any electron's position, the less we know about its momentum, and the more we know about an electron's momentum, the less we know about its position.I said nothing about colliding. The movement of electrons, between levels, is not random.
Dial it back. You are being deliberately obtuse.Of a god? How would they be?
Maybe it can, but that doesn't negate the cause of the other movements.You still don't know what that means. Collisions, which are random, determine the movement of electrons.
Ok.The more we know about any electron's position, the less we know about its momentum, and the more we know about an electron's momentum, the less we know about its position.
Electrons move from level to level based on energy.If an engineer were to tell you that his design involved only probabilities about what components it would have and where they might reside, you would rush to impulsively declare the design "well organized and coherent". No randomness there, nope.
So, back to ice cores being evidence of a god....Dial it back. You are being deliberately obtuse.
Does anybody consider ice cores as evidence of anything, ... say, of Climate Change?
13.8 billion. I went back in time and verified.The cosmic background afterglow has been receding from us for 13.5 billion years.
Assuming an expanding universe, and assuming cosmological expansion.It is the farthest point on our visible cosmic horizon.
Yep.All electromagnetic radiation is light.
The visible spectrum, to be specific.The human eye is evolved to only see a narrow spectrum of that bandwidth.
So we agree that the motion of electrons is random. Do we need to walk through the other particles as well?Maybe it can, but that doesn't negate ...
Who's asking?Are you a science guy or not so much?