ID Check upheld

bravo said:
The op, title notwithstanding, it perfectly true and clarified in the context of the post......

Its just like a leftwing lacky to take one line out of context and use that to make an invalid and stupid point...

From your link:
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals did uphold provisions of the state immigration law that allow police to stop people they have a "reasonable suspicion" of being in the country unlawfully, and to ask about the immigration status of motorists without driver's licenses.


No one was talking about school children registering for school.
Click to expand...

It's just too bad that you can't read. I stand by every word that I wrote and it's authenticity and relevance to this subject.
 
bravo said:
See above,the first four words anyway.
Click to expand...

You seem to be having great difficulty in comprehension. I've now read about 6 different articles concerning the 11th District ruling, all of which shed a bit different light and even read some of the ruling itself. The lies of the Arizona rag don't mean jack shit to me. They have a definite agenda and it ain't anything to do with "news".
 
Gatorman said:
I can verify for all time that Winterborn is NOT A LIBERAL. On the other hand, I AM A LIBERAL and I deeply respect Winterborn and many if not most of his views. He is well spoken, well behaved and generally wants to relegate debates/conversations to polite and meaningful sharing of information. I know that he has been patient with me and taught me a lot. All I have to do is stop and listen to some of what he has to say. nofacts has nothing. No skills, no knowledge of anything, shit for an attitude and seems to be quite proud of all that. nofacts gives genuine conservatives a very bad name.
Click to expand...

Thanks, Gatorman.
 
Gatorman said:
Your thread title is a total lie. Your source is a partisan Arizona rag dedicated to uphold their ridiculous laws and poor ole' mistreated Sheriff Joe Arpiao, and their conclusion is shit on top of shit. No truth in any of it. Immigrants in Georgia can breath more freely now. They are no longer expected to prove anything except their innocence if charged with a crime. Their immigration status remains a federal issue.
Click to expand...



I wonder if Gatorman will jump all over Darla for this thread title, which is so obviously a lie and is too far fetched to even
be remotely clarified in the body of the post.....

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?43437-GOP-Platform-Women-Not-Human

Claiming 'women not human' is in the R platform is an outragious lie plain and simple.....

go get her gatorfool....show just how 'fair minded' you are.....
 
Gatorman said:
No. You are trying to build the straw man. What I have written on these issues remains unrefuted and continues to be 100% accurate, dumbass. It was me that initially used the word "suspect" as in "suspected immigrant". Did you miss that, bitch? Just what is a "suspected immigrant" and what would compel anyone to care? I think I see immigrants everyday but I don't care enough to find out anything about their status. It ain't none of my business and the courts are telling the states that it ain't none of their business either. Even if a local "checks" and discovers an "illegal immigrant" he first exposes himself to all kinds of legal wranglings with the feds or the ACLU and second he can't do a damned thing about this so-called "illegal immigrant" other than inform the INS and drop it right there. By that time the "illegal immigrant" is long gone and probably back on his $4 an hour job working for some damned rethug politician.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA What a fucking IDIOT!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

I love it when you have your classic melt downs, which are followed by the usual ranting and raving; because they are amusing.

The article said nothing about "suspected illegal", it said suspects; but once again, you are unable to read and comprehend what was offered and instead read into the information what you want it to say. :D

Since it's obvious that you're unable to actually discuss what is factual and instead want to make it into something that isn't, please continue with your amusing meltdowns. :D
 
Gatorman said:
Most of it was thrown out in the 11th District yesterday and you are correct. The rest will be thrown out in another court. Right now Alabama and Georgia are licking their wounds and howling at the moon. Things will get worse for them. You can bet on that.
Click to expand...

Since I began this thread about the ruling in Georgia, please show where the majority of the Georgia was thrown out by the 11th District Court.

OH-WAIT, you can't; can you? :D
 
Gatorman said:
You seem to be having great difficulty in comprehension. I've now read about 6 different articles concerning the 11th District ruling, all of which shed a bit different light and even read some of the ruling itself. The lies of the Arizona rag don't mean jack shit to me. They have a definite agenda and it ain't anything to do with "news".
Click to expand...

Speaking of comprehension; it's apparent that you missed the part where the article was from Atlanta (associated press). :D
 
Gatorman said:
I can verify for all time that Winterborn is NOT A LIBERAL. On the other hand, I AM A LIBERAL and I deeply respect Winterborn and many if not most of his views. He is well spoken, well behaved and generally wants to relegate debates/conversations to polite and meaningful sharing of information. I know that he has been patient with me and taught me a lot. All I have to do is stop and listen to some of what he has to say. nofacts has nothing. No skills, no knowledge of anything, shit for an attitude and seems to be quite proud of all that. nofacts gives genuine conservatives a very bad name.
Click to expand...


Well said Gatorman!

WB is one of the few bastions of civility on these boards!

He can make his point and still burn your ass without resorting to even a single vulgarity.
 
does this mean we're finally free to suppress the Democrats vote now?......

by the way, "Democrats" is a code word for whiny, semi-intelligent losers who aren't bright enough to get a photo ID......
 
bravo said:
I wonder if Gatorman will jump all over Darla for this thread title, which is so obviously a lie and is too far fetched to even
be remotely clarified in the body of the post.....

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?43437-GOP-Platform-Women-Not-Human

Claiming 'women not human' is in the R platform is an outragious lie plain and simple.....

go get her gatorfool....show just how 'fair minded' you are.....
Click to expand...

When a zygote trumps a woman's rights then the woman is for all practical purposes less human than the zygote. But none of that matters on the issue of ID inspection for presumed illegal immigrants. The courts agree that this is a federal matter and not a state matter and to leave the people alone and free. That is the AMERICAN way.
 
Gatorman said:
When a zygote trumps a woman's rights then the woman is for all practical purposes less human than the zygote. But none of that matters on the issue of ID inspection for presumed illegal immigrants. The courts agree that this is a federal matter and not a state matter and to leave the people alone and free. That is the AMERICAN way.
Click to expand...

That's not what they said and you know it, regarding the ruling for Georgia; but you're to butt hurt over the ruling to admit it. :D

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top