ICE releasing 1000 "low risk" illegal aliens a week.

T

tinfoil

Banned
Your tax dollars hard at work!

http://washingtonexaminer.com/dhs-p...migrants-due-to-sequestration/article/2523295


Napolitano said that it wasn’t her decision, even though ICE is part of DHS. “Detainee populations and how that is managed back and forth is really handled by career officials in the field,” she told ABC.

She also confirmed that the releases would continue. “We are going to manage our way through this by identifying the lowest risk detainees, and putting them into some kind of alternative to release,” Napolitano said at a Politico event, per The Daily Caller.
The New York Times profiled a “low risk” detainee released by ICE. The detainee was taken into custody “when it was discovered that he had violated probation for a conviction in 2005 of simple assault, simple battery and child abuse, charges that sprung from a domestic dispute with his wife at the time.” NRO’s Jim Geraghty asked, “If convictions for ‘simple assault, simple battery and child abuse’ make you ‘low-risk,’ what do you have to do for Janet Napolitano to consider you ‘high-risk’?”
 
tinfoil said:
Your tax dollars hard at work!

http://washingtonexaminer.com/dhs-p...migrants-due-to-sequestration/article/2523295


Napolitano said that it wasn’t her decision, even though ICE is part of DHS. “Detainee populations and how that is managed back and forth is really handled by career officials in the field,” she told ABC.

She also confirmed that the releases would continue. “We are going to manage our way through this by identifying the lowest risk detainees, and putting them into some kind of alternative to release,” Napolitano said at a Politico event, per The Daily Caller.
The New York Times profiled a “low risk” detainee released by ICE. The detainee was taken into custody “when it was discovered that he had violated probation for a conviction in 2005 of simple assault, simple battery and child abuse, charges that sprung from a domestic dispute with his wife at the time.” NRO’s Jim Geraghty asked, “If convictions for ‘simple assault, simple battery and child abuse’ make you ‘low-risk,’ what do you have to do for Janet Napolitano to consider you ‘high-risk’?”
Click to expand...


Give thanks to Rightie obstructionism and the Sequester they forced upon us!
 
tinfoil said:
Your tax dollars hard at work!

http://washingtonexaminer.com/dhs-p...migrants-due-to-sequestration/article/2523295


Napolitano said that it wasn’t her decision, even though ICE is part of DHS. “Detainee populations and how that is managed back and forth is really handled by career officials in the field,” she told ABC.

She also confirmed that the releases would continue. “We are going to manage our way through this by identifying the lowest risk detainees, and putting them into some kind of alternative to release,” Napolitano said at a Politico event, per The Daily Caller.
The New York Times profiled a “low risk” detainee released by ICE. The detainee was taken into custody “when it was discovered that he had violated probation for a conviction in 2005 of simple assault, simple battery and child abuse, charges that sprung from a domestic dispute with his wife at the time.” NRO’s Jim Geraghty asked, “If convictions for ‘simple assault, simple battery and child abuse’ make you ‘low-risk,’ what do you have to do for Janet Napolitano to consider you ‘high-risk’?”
Click to expand...

Nope, this is the tax cuts at work and you will continue to see more of this.

Waaaaaahhhhhhhh, the government is making cuts in places I don't like, waaaahhhhaaaaa

Better get use to it!
 
Rana said:
Nope, this is the tax cuts at work and you will continue to see more of this.

Waaaaaahhhhhhhh, the government is making cuts in places I don't like, waaaahhhhaaaaa

Better get use to it!
Click to expand...

Idiot. The government is making the cuts as painful as possible in hopes they can blame republicans and score some political points with low information voters.

They even got outed by honest people in the government who shared the shameful email from Obama.

"So it is our opinion that however you manage that reduction, you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we said the impact would be."
 
tinfoil said:
Idiot. The government is making the cuts as painful as possible in hopes they can blame republicans and score some political points with low information voters.

They even got outed by honest people in the government who shared the shameful email from Obama.

"So it is our opinion that however you manage that reduction, you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we said the impact would be."
Click to expand...


I got news for ya Tinhead...Democrats will be scoring points off this latest episode of Rightie obstructionism for a looooooooooooooong time.

Boo Hoo Hoo...Righties wanted cuts, they got cuts and now they're whining about the cuts they wanted and subsequently got.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I got news for ya Tinhead...Democrats will be scoring points off this latest episode of Rightie obstructionism for a looooooooooooooong time.

Boo Hoo Hoo...Righties wanted cuts, they got cuts and now they're whining about the cuts they wanted and subsequently got.
Click to expand...

Obama Misled in Debate: The President Did Propose the Sequester -
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...se-sequester_705015.html#sthash.5pab2ERz.dpuf

I will veto ...... spending cuts (sequester)
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I got news for ya Tinhead...Democrats will be scoring points off this latest episode of Rightie obstructionism for a looooooooooooooong time.

Boo Hoo Hoo...Righties wanted cuts, they got cuts and now they're whining about the cuts they wanted and subsequently got.
Click to expand...

Only with low information voters and partisan dipshits like you. Enjoy yourself. You're getting played like a fiddle, dumbass. You know it and you like it. You love that stupid people buy the meme that Republicans are responsible when we see that Obama want the cuts to be painful. Republicans expected responsible cost cutting. What Obama demands is to make the public feel the pain before anyone in government feels it.

Fuck you all the partisans like you
 
NOVA said:
Obama Misled in Debate: The President Did Propose the Sequester -
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...se-sequester_705015.html#sthash.5pab2ERz.dpuf

I will veto ...... spending cuts (sequester)
Click to expand...


As I have already proved on another thread that this is indeed just another heavily edited soundbite used by FAUX News and hateful Righties trying to pin this on the president, the ACTUAL QUOTE says:




Now, the question right now is whether we can reduce the deficit in a way that helps the economy grow, that operates with a scalpel, not with a hatchet, and if not, whether Congress is willing to stick to the painful deal that we made in August for the automatic cuts. Already, some in Congress are trying to undo these automatic spending cuts.

My message to them is simple: No. I will veto any effort to get rid of those automatic spending cuts to domestic and defense spending. There will be no easy off ramps on this one.

We need to keep the pressure up to compromise -- not turn off the pressure. The only way these spending cuts will not take place is if Congress gets back to work and agrees on a balanced plan to reduce the deficit by at least $1.2 trillion. That's exactly what they need to do. That's the job they promised to do. And they've still got a year to figure it out. [The White House, 11/21/11]


NOVA...full of shit once again.
 
tinfoil said:
Only with low information voters and partisan dipshits like you. Enjoy yourself. You're getting played like a fiddle, dumbass. You know it and you like it. You love that stupid people buy the meme that Republicans are responsible when we see that Obama want the cuts to be painful. Republicans expected responsible cost cutting. What Obama demands is to make the public feel the pain before anyone in government feels it.

Fuck you all the partisans like you
Click to expand...


If Republicans wanted responsible cutting they should have done their jobs themselves instead of waiting for someone else to do it for them!

But NOOOOOOOOO...they thought they could punt this down the road and then attack the President for his cuts and score points for the upcoming election.
 
tinfoil said:
Your tax dollars hard at work!

http://washingtonexaminer.com/dhs-p...migrants-due-to-sequestration/article/2523295


Napolitano said that it wasn’t her decision, even though ICE is part of DHS. “Detainee populations and how that is managed back and forth is really handled by career officials in the field,” she told ABC.

She also confirmed that the releases would continue. “We are going to manage our way through this by identifying the lowest risk detainees, and putting them into some kind of alternative to release,” Napolitano said at a Politico event, per The Daily Caller.
The New York Times profiled a “low risk” detainee released by ICE. The detainee was taken into custody “when it was discovered that he had violated probation for a conviction in 2005 of simple assault, simple battery and child abuse, charges that sprung from a domestic dispute with his wife at the time.” NRO’s Jim Geraghty asked, “If convictions for ‘simple assault, simple battery and child abuse’ make you ‘low-risk,’ what do you have to do for Janet Napolitano to consider you ‘high-risk’?”
Click to expand...

"...ICE reviewed its detained population to ensure detention levels stay within ICE's current budget and placed several hundred individuals on methods of supervision less costly than detention..."

Yeah, keeping track has worked so well in the past. :palm:
 
Waaahhhhh the GOP gave Obama his way on sequester so now it is all the GOPs fault that Obama got exactly what he wanted.

Man I love liberals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top