I wish I could make this up.

Marxists like yourself say that voter ID is racist because the coloreds disproportionately dont have ID compared to whitey.

It isn’t my claim. It is Marxists claim.

So it stands to reason that if the coloreds in NYC don’t have ID in order to vote, then they can’t register for this temporary job.

It isn’t complicated.

But I understand that it is painful having your shibboleths blown up in your face..

PS

You Marxists are so predictable. You are so easily distracted by words like “colored”. Or is it triggered? Do we still use triggered?

All informed people say that. They show their ID when the first register to vote.

You are slow.
 
When I registered people to vote, I had to get their ID, or the form was rejected. I also informed people whether they qualified. In some states, if a criminal serves his time and his parole finishes, he can vote. Not true in all states. Some want ex-felons to never vote again. That is a subtle form of voter suppression.
Some states allow a current utility bill. That also helps to prove address for deciding where to vote. Utility companies require ID before you can get an account.

There is simply no way to skirt ID requirements in order to vote
 
When I registered people to vote, I had to get their ID, or the form was rejected. I also informed people whether they qualified. In some states, if a criminal serves his time and his parole finishes, he can vote. Not true in all states. Some want ex-felons to never vote again. That is a subtle form of voter suppression.
Wow. Wouldn't it be ironic if the felonious Pedophile President couldn't vote? :thinking:

Nothing bars former President Donald Trump from running for the White House now that he's a convicted felon. But what about his own voting rights? The state of Florida, where Trump is registered to vote, has a complicated history when it comes to restoring voting rights after a felony conviction. But this likely won't matter for Trump, as NPR's Ashley Lopez explains.

ASHLEY LOPEZ, BYLINE: The bottom line is that Trump is more than likely going to be able to vote for himself in Florida come November. Blair Bowie with the Campaign Legal Center says a big reason for that is that he was convicted in New York and not his home state of Florida.
 
What coloreds who have no IDs to whom are you referring.

What Marxists?

You are a snowflake melting away.
Teflon Dummy is clearly a racist in addition to be a typical MAGAt misogynist and overall spineless witless twit.

That said, one Democratic argument against requiring a valid picture ID for voting is that poor people disproportionately lack these IDs. Due to centuries of racism, this also disproportionately works against non-white voters.

Personally, I support voter ID at the time of voting. However, measures must be taken to prevent this from becoming a backdoor poll tax. ID's must be easily and cheaply available and the system rolled out over time to allow people time to acquire IDs. Accommodations must be made for older voters and invalids to acquire ID. RWers should pay attention here since older people often swing conservative.

Whether states should require voters to show identification before voting is a subject of debate.
Supporters of requiring voter identification laws argue that it is needed to prevent voter fraud, it does not decrease voter turnout, and it is popular with voters.
Opponents of requiring voter identification laws argue that they are burdensome for many voters and target minorities. Opponents of requiring voter identification also argue that in-person voter fraud is rare.
 
Nobody said that.

But nice try.
MAGAts, besides being morons and liars, love to exaggerate.

Example; anyone who isn't a die-hard MAGAt is considered a Leftist, Marxist, Socialist. It's a measure of how extreme they are and why they need to be neutralized like rabid dogs.
 
you are rewriting history

it has long been the argument of marxists like yourself that the poor, women, coloreds are all disenfranchised by Voter ID because they are less likely to have ID.

Otherwise you should have no rational reason to oppose it.
^^^
Too moronic to provide a link as I already did. Sad, but expected of JPP's deplorable demented drunks and dumbasses.
 
you are rewriting history

it has long been the argument of marxists like yourself that the poor, women, coloreds are all disenfranchised by Voter ID because they are less likely to have ID.

Otherwise you should have no rational reason to oppose it.
That happens to be true: they are less likely to have ID.

You would know a Marxist if one bit you on the dick.
 
That happens to be true: they are less likely to have ID.

You would know a Marxist if one bit you on the dick.
Which was probably the last time he had sex; his "Marxist, Leftist, Liberal" wife bit him and walked out forever. He's never been the same since due to "damaged equipment".
 
Back
Top