I Teach the Humanities, and I Still Don’t Know What Their Value Is

You might be right.

It's easy to get lazy and teach philosophy and history as if it's still 1850. I think the teaching humanities needs an overhaul. I have seen some great history professors who have evolved from dry recitations of dates and names of the great Europeans, into a kind of narrative, story-telling type of history teaching.

Have you ever taken a university philosophy class? I mean, in person as an enrolled student.
 
By Agnes Callard, associate professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago

As a humanist — someone who reads, teaches and researches primarily philosophy but also, on the side, novels and poems and plays and movies — I am prepared to come out and admit that I do not know what the value of the humanities is. I do not know whether the study of the humanities promotes democracy or improves your moral character or enriches your leisure time or improves your critical thinking skills or increases your empathy.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/02/opinion/education-humanities-college-value.html

A bold statement or hack admitting she has a good job and does not care anymore?

Both.
 
I never heard a physics, chemistry, or math major say to me that colleges should stop offering humanities classes. It's widely understood that a broad liberal education, including humanities requirements and electives, are supposed to enrich people and make them better writers and thinkers

Then humanities have failed. People coming out of them can't think.
 
You are insulting, you know you are and disagreed since Cypress knows more about philosophy than you've ever demonstrated, ma'am.

Religion is a subset of philosophy...or can be. There's the dogma, of which there are no questions, and then there's the philosophy as demonstrated by people like Thomas Aquinas and John Donne.

Religion is not a subset of philosophy, Sock.
You deny philosophy.
 
Asians do not have a clear distinction between philosophy and religion,
They certainly do.
and Asians don't even concieve of religion the same way Europeans do.
They certainly do.
You have to remove yourself from the mindset of a European.
Already have. You simply don't know anything about Asia.
The Analects, the Zhuangzi, the Daodejing have almost nothing about gods or dieties.
They certainly do.
And their foundations of moral philosophy, political philosophy, ontology, metaphysics are every bit as interesting and sophisticated as the Greek and western European tradition.
There is no such thing as moral philosophy or political philosophy.
 
You might be right.

It's easy to get lazy and teach philosophy and history as if it's still 1850. I think the teaching humanities needs an overhaul. I have seen some great history professors who have evolved from dry recitations of dates and names of the great Europeans, into a kind of narrative, story-telling type of history teaching.
Good point. My last college classes were in 1990 just as the Internet was catching hold. Professors and Universities who are still teaching like they were 30 years ago need to update themselves for the new century.
 
Well, for many women who go to college, the humanities offer simple degree programs that fit well with their intention of getting an Mrs. degree...

Misogynist says wut now? Geeze. You're rather long in the tooth to be an Incel, aren't you? I guess you can be one at any age though.
 
Back
Top