I predict Pelosi will call a press conference today or tomorrow

Getin the ring said:
cool regansbat$hitcrazy is making political predictions now,

I remember the one about Hillary winning the election :rofl2:

you're one sad little man
Click to expand...

I remember the one about Rmoney winning the election. :rofl2:

Fox 'News' 2012 Narrative of the Moment: 'Landslide Romney!'
By Brad Friedman on 10/9/2012, 11:47am PT

Fox "News" is now informing their viewers to get ready for President Mitt Romney! It's gonna be a rout this November, according to the Rightwing media outlet's latest "updated election forecasting model" for the November 2012 election. That "model" today includes Romney winning every single swingstate, with the exception of Nevada. That would include Romney wins in Pennsylvania, where the TPM PollTracker average currently has Obama up by 4.4 points, and Wisconsin, where Obama is reportedly up by 8.5 points in TPM's combined poll average. (See all of TPM PollTracker's swingstate averages here).

So here's what all of that now looks like today in Fox "News" World...
https://twitter.com/x/status/255726700384628736

To be sure, Romney has seen a significant bump in pre-election national polling on the heels of last week's first Presidential Debate. There is still a dearth of reliable state-by-state polls since the debate, however, that might lead to Fox' predictions seen above. Nonetheless, they're now on the record trumpeting the upcoming Romney Landslide.

https://bradblog.com/?p=9624
 
The wicked witch of the West is between a rock and a hard place. Impeach-a loss of Biblical proportions in 2020. No impeachment-her party splinters and a civil war among Democrats of Biblical proportions.

I predict she will devolve further into senility and insanity.
 
What's changed? -0- Nothing. The only thing Mueller did was preempt Fat Jerry's dog and pony show in the front of the camera's. Once again Mueller stated the obvious. He could not "exonerate" Mr. Trump. Why? Everyone is considered innocent until proven guilty....not the inversion where some Federal Prosecutor must find NEGATIVE EVIDENCE that proves someone is innocent of state charges. Does anyone really think that Mueller wants to go in front of the cameras on the hill and be grilled by the REPUBLICANS as to why he inverted the justice system rule of law in order to declare that someone is guilty until proven innocent.....or just when did Mueller know that Mr. Trump was totally innocent of Russian Collusion and why did he keep the investigation open for over an additional year knowing there was NO THERE, THERE?

The one thing we did find out in sort of a hump backed and crooked way...…..How Comey got the idea that everyone is guilty until proven innocent, and how its up to a federal agent to EXONERATE instead of prosecute. It appears these 2 boys, (more than friends) have exactly the same ideology when comes to their role as government agents, its their job to play god and exonerate by opinion instead of prosecuting via PROBABLE CAUSE. :bigthink: They did....apparently find the NEGATIVE EVIDENCE to EXONERATE HILLARY well before she was ever questioned for the record, and never under oath....Just like Comey said when he eliminated the office of the AG and its entire prosecutorial staff when COMEY unilaterally declared.....she was innocent due to her ignorance....even though she misplaced over 30K emails, destroyed her hard drives, and actually smashed some electronic communication devices to bits with a literal hammer......she did not obstruct justice because there was no intent to cover up anything. :laugh:

Personally I would love to watch the dems spend the next year attempting to remove the President from office with no evidence of any crime ever having been introduced into the record. Does anyone really think that congress will do what Mueller, almost 2 dozen democrat lawyers, over 40 FBI agents, 500 witnesses, and a budget in the 10s of millions could not do......find an impeachable crime when the POTUS has already made it known that he would invoke executive privilege every step of the way? Then....even if its out of pure hate and spite.....congress does proceed with an up and down impeachment vote, the actual punishment stage goes to the UPPER HOUSE (the senate) totally controlled by those evil ass publicans.

In the minds of the democrats....this proves it.....Hillary was exonerated by COMEY and TEAM.....TRUMP was not exonerated, HE MUST BE GUILTY OF SOMETHING....we just have to continue to fish for that guilt. ITS THERE...SOMEWHERE, BOB TOLD US...…..It was that damn Constitution thing and the Bill of Rights that stopped him from finding it....but congress is not hindered by such a thing as the rule of law because an impeachment hearing is not based upon law but POLTICS.

Conclusion? LEGALLY....its over, as the Attorney General of the United States declared, No Collusion/No Obstruction. Politically ITS JUST BEGINNING. Welcome to the SHOW. Sit back, get some popcorn and allow the curtain to open. :cool:

I say...…..GO FOR IT.....I am behind you all the way to Nov. 2020. ;)
 
Last edited:
Teflon Don said:
Two things

1) When he said that indicting a sitting President is unconstitutional. It is not. It is DOJ policy, but it has never been deemed unconstitutional

2) When he said if we thought Trump was innocent we would have said it. That turned hundreds of years of jurisprudence on its head.

Innocent until proven guilty.

But, in the end Mueller really fucked over democrats
Click to expand...

Bullshit you fucking retard.
Justice is blind, not Special Prosecutors.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top