You seem to be utterly fascinated with the subject. Why is that?
Just because bigotry was accepted in the past does not mean it is right.
You at least insinuate that because liberals are wrong about historical acceptance that current acceptance is somehow invalid.
There are times and places in history where homosexuality was acceptable and times and places where it was not, why does it matter?
Do you ask liberals that question when they refer to ancient practices like pederasty, Counselor?
Interracial and interreligious marriages were also not traditionally accepted. That matters not in the least. Just because bigotry was accepted in the past does not mean it is right.
Ive never known a liberal to refer to such practices.
You at least insinuate that because liberals are wrong about historical acceptance that current acceptance is somehow invalid.
What makes you think its currently accepted ? Try tolerated or better yet, ignored.
You at least insinuate that because liberals are wrong about historical acceptance that current acceptance is somehow invalid.
There are times and places in history where homosexuality was acceptable and times and places where it was not, why does it matter?
It was pretty damned acceptable in Sparta and those guys certainly weren't limp wristed pansies.