Polly wants a cracker.Kettle fallacy.
Polly wants a cracker.Kettle fallacy.
Scrolled by.
Scrolled by.
YARPWhat is the reason for this obsession with Jarod?
Scrolled by.YARP
YARPPolly wants a cracker.
Polly sez YARP.YARP
YARPPolly sez YARP.
Polly sez YARP.YARP
Really? If you oppose the action(s), you are de facto wanting your side to lose. Cheering on the military to lose is oxymoron of sorts. It's in effect saying, I'm proud of our military being defeated in Iran...You can support the military & oppose the action. In fact, sometimes opposing the action is the best support we can give the military.
Maybe the poor should try harder to feed themselves.Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
View attachment 78864
Bad logic. See Vietnam WarReally? If you oppose the action(s), you are de facto wanting your side to lose.
Where did he cheer for them to lose?Cheering on the military to lose is oxymoron of sorts. It's in effect saying, I'm proud of our military being defeated in Iran...
Why is it that you trumptards celebrate the deaths of almost 200 little school girls? You're so evil!Of course. What,.....do you expect me to cheer AGAINST our military like so many leftists do? Not gonna happen.
It's so pathetic how the trumptards here complain about "Biden's economy" and how "trump was going to fix it". Instead, trump's probably fucked us so badly with his fucked up tariffs and the Iran war no one asked for - we'll likely not recover trump's mess for years!In my hybred car, and living a mile from work, walking here most days this time of year... Also using my wifes car usually to go out at night, I barely burn a gallon a week.
The issue for me is others.... and the inflationary affects on the overall market.
The best way we can support the troops is to refuse to fund trump's stupid war and bring our troops home!You can support the military & oppose the action. In fact, sometimes opposing the action is the best support we can give the military.
Yes, because billionaires need a second yatch so fuck the poor, amirite?Maybe the poor should try harder to feed themselves.
Bad logic. See Vietnam War
By indirectly wanting the US to lose in Iran or at a minimum let Iran's government survive intact and continue to operate as it has for the past five decades.Where did he cheer for them to lose?
The poor are the ones who fight and die for all these Wall Street wars. You learned nothing from Afghanistan and Iraq.Maybe the poor should try harder to feed themselves.
No, you're wrong. Wealth is not a fixed size 'pie.' Billionaires can have their yachts, and the poor can work harder to not be poor. The poor do not have to work for billionaires to do that either.Yes, because billionaires need a second yatch so fuck the poor, amirite?
So no examples.During the Vietnam War, those protesting it also protested the military.
By indirectly wanting the US to lose in Iran or at a minimum let Iran's government survive intact and continue to operate as it has for the past five decades.
Notice how Stone is so concerned about what others are doing / going. It's like he has no life of his own. He only posted this to troll.How many people here think Stone and TA...really have no idea why anyone...from the right or the left...complains about the price at the pump? How many think those two are stupid enough to be oblivious of why people might be doing that?