Get rid of doesn’t magically become murder just because you ran out of arguments. You’re stretching definitions like taffy because you can’t refute the actual evidence. When the facts don’t land in your favor, you default to name‑calling, which tells everyone exactly how empty your point really is.
if Hillary said we need to get rid of Vince foster would you consider that suspicious?
Dragging in a completely different scenario doesn’t save your argument. You’re dodging because you can’t defend the claim you already made. I’m talking about the documented meaning of a slang term, and you’re trying to smuggle in a whole new context to distract from the fact that your definition collapsed the moment evidence showed up.
its a perfectly good example of the exact usage we're referencing, you troglodytic fake lesbian.