I cant wait until tomorrow!

1.gif
 
I'm saying red governors are allowing their dumb Dem cities to perish from their own stupidity.

we need more smart red governors.
What you are saying is that Red State governors and those in power are dumb and weak such that even a small Dem populace in the State has all the control, even if they do not hold the top seats of power.

We know crime is a big issue for Magats and for the governors. We know you love to beat a drum about Blue State crime. So you saying 'ya the Red State governors could control their States and make them better then Blue States but they CHOOSE not to', just makes magats look stupid.

WHy can Blue States with blue cities perform better than Red State with blue cities? That answer is when you put Magats in charge things go to shit.

You agree right?
 
What you are saying is that Red State governors and those in power are dumb and weak such that even a small Dem populace in the State has all the control, even if they do not hold the top seats of power.

We know crime is a big issue for Magats and for the governors. We know you love to beat a drum about Blue State crime. So you saying 'ya the Red State governors could control their States and make them better then Blue States but they CHOOSE not to', just makes magats look stupid.

WHy can Blue States with blue cities perform better than Red State with blue cities? That answer is when you put Magats in charge things go to shit.

You agree right?
Not at all

It's all constipated and stupid reasoning


Stay dem and lose
 
Not at all

It's all constipated and stupid reasoning


Stay dem and lose
So how do you explain Dem run states with Dem governors and leadership and dem cities within, doing better than the Magat lead States when your claim is that is having 'Dem cities' that makes Red States so useless at governing?

How do you get around the clear fact that if those Magat States had Dem governors and leadership instead, they would do better?
 
So how do you explain Dem run states with Dem governors and leadership and dem cities within, doing better than the Magat lead States when your claim is that is having 'Dem cities' that makes Red States so useless at governing?

How do you get around the clear fact that if those Magat States had Dem governors and leadership instead, they would do better?
how are Dems states "doing better"?


what's your metric?
 
Back
Top