I can't believe we don't already do this

PostmodernProphet said:
dude......citizens have no expectation of privacy on their social media accounts.......why the fuck should non-citizens.....
Click to expand...

so we should expect to have our gov't know our passwords and read all our messages we write? If that's the case then why were any terrorists attacks committed if they are already reading everything?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
when you guys say that is it because you think there are different rules for vetting the refugees than there are for the people we've let in who HAVE engaged in terror attacks?......like the wife of the San Bernadino terrorist?.......its the same set of rules......I wonder if the state department even follows up on the information they say we demand so much of......probably just wastebaskets full of paper while the people who are supposed to be vetting post anti-trump messages on Democrat Underground.......
Click to expand...
She was from Saudi Arabia. They were not and are not going to "extreme vette" Saudi's who have been the only foreign Muslim nationals to commit terrorist acts in our country. If there is another terrorist attack by Saudi Nationals who would you ban next? Indonesians? Malaysians?
 
cawacko said:
so we should expect to have our gov't know our passwords and read all our messages we write? If that's the case then why were any terrorists attacks committed if they are already reading everything?
Click to expand...

I believe that's where we began.....as the man said "I can't believe we aren't already doing this".......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
"their country isn't on the president's ban list" doesn't fucking matter.......its a good point because the vetting we've done in the past is worthless.......why use it on refugees now?.......why not just say "special deal on terrorists!.....Two admitted for the price of one!......bring your own C4"........
Click to expand...

Angry apologist.:palm:

Just like the vetting "the so called president" wants to do now=BULL SHIT!!! fucking Egypt & wackistan not on the list?? BULL SHIT!! saudia Arabia not on the list?? BULL SHIT... & you know it, if you admit it or not, don't matter..
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Uhm...is there something about "private messages" you don't understand?
Click to expand...

yeah, the part where you decided to substitute them in for "social media".......have Dolly explain how snapshot has taken over for Netscape messaging......being a sheep, she's smarter about things like that than you are
 
Bill said:
Angry apologist.:palm:

Just like the vetting "the so called president" wants to do now=BULL SHIT!!! fucking Egypt & wackistan not on the list?? BULL SHIT!! saudia Arabia not on the list?? BULL SHIT... & you know it, if you admit it or not, don't matter..
Click to expand...

"I'm not going to look for terrorists from Syria because there may be a terrorist in Egypt".......ah billy, that's why you didn't get elected and Trump did.......
 
cawacko said:
Your desire to cut off immigration and not allow the free travel of people is what's going to harm out econony. This act isn't about safety it's about Muslims. You don't want Muslims here. And this ban has already caused business deals to be lost and dampening affects on international business.
Click to expand...
with due respect you've completely lost it if you are gonna parrot the "Muslim ban" morons.
If it was about Muslims SA and Pakistan would be on the list. Same with Eqypt..
They aren't because we are able to work with their country on reliable immigration standards.
If we can't even verify immigration,how can we verify refugees?

Again look at how ISIS is able to produce counterfeit passports with docs.from those countries

Compare those countries to Sudan or Libya,Yemen etc, where there isn't really any central government
capable of interfacing with the USA.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
So we're supposed to just ignore our values cause you're a coward? I'm afraid not.
Click to expand...
what values? how is vetting to whatever ends possible to allow refugees in under an orderly process
from countries where terrorism reduces that gov't ability to clearly ID such against our values?

and you can stuff that cowardly crap too. There is nothing noble about not protecting the populace from terrorism
 
cawacko said:
so we should expect to have our gov't know our passwords and read all our messages we write? If that's the case then why were any terrorists attacks committed if they are already reading everything?
Click to expand...

I agree with you that regardless of a paperless society so called "general warrants" are unConstiutional-
but that only applies to US citizens or aliens here already who have been legally processed.
 
cawacko said:
refugees haven't committed terrorists attacks in the U.S. nor have anyone from the country's we are vetting but it's still an excellent idea right...
Click to expand...
Refugees have committed attacks in Germany and France, so there is that.

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top