"I am going to get assault weapons banned."--President Biden

feel free to show that 'social contract' and who signed it.

You live in it, moron. Tell a cop you don't consent to the social contract. Tell the military you don't consent to the social contract. Tell a judge, your neighbor, your family, and the people in the grocery that you don't consent to the social contract. The reality is that you're allowed to live in civilization because you consent to the social contract. So you will have your rights restricted and expanded according to the will of the people who govern you. Don't be such a little bitch about it.
 
Only you define it that way.

Well, maybe him and smart people.

Certainly not you.

An assault rifle is defined as a weapon which has selective fire:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle

"The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges." In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:

It must be capable of selective fire."


An AR-15 doesn't have the very first criteria listed for it to be an "assault rifle".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_fire

"Selective fire is the capability of a weapon to be adjusted to fire in semi-automatic, fully automatic, and/or burst mode".

So, yeah, you're wrong...
 
You live in it, moron. Tell a cop you don't consent to the social contract. Tell the military you don't consent to the social contract. Tell a judge, your neighbor, your family, and the people in the grocery that you don't consent to the social contract. The reality is that you're allowed to live in civilization because you consent to the social contract. So you will have your rights restricted and expanded according to the will of the people who govern you. Don't be such a little bitch about it.

The US Constitution was written AND ratified by the people to protect individual rights............your so called social contract, if it exists, has yet to be proven in any court of law that i'm aware of, so if you have a copy, please post it. your little appeal to authority bullshit is simply your liberalism being shown as tyranny, you want to use government to force your point of view on others. it will blow up in your face
 
there are numerous citations from the founding era, before and after ratification, that specifically state that the government has zero power or authority over the arms of the people.

You're an actual idiot and a liar, although I'm not sure which one you're more of. That was never the intention of the Second Amendment, and not one single person claimed otherwise.
 
irrelevant to freedom. The founding fathers distrusted government in all forms, which is why they created one with many restrictions and limits on their powers as prescribed by the Constitution. The government was created to protect the exercise of the RIGHTS of the people, not protect the people themselves.

There is no freedom my dear when you are randomly killed by a firearm. Gun deaths in this country went up by 70% between 2011 and 2021. Please dont pretend to be a constitutional expert, your interpretation is based solely on your hate not on the constitution your president wants to outlaw, and which you dont seem to disagree with.
 
The US Constitution was written AND ratified by the people to protect individual rights............your so called social contract, if it exists, has yet to be proven in any court of law that i'm aware of, so if you have a copy, please post it. your little appeal to authority bullshit is simply your liberalism being shown as tyranny, you want to use government to force your point of view on others. it will blow up in your face

Do you park inside the lines of the stall you're allowed to use for a short time? Do you stand behind the person who arrived at the bank teller before you or do you just walk up to the counter? Do you put the gas pump back in its holder when you're done using it? Do you obey speed limits? Do you keep quiet while watching a movie in a theater?

DumberThanAnyRandomBitch, you're arguing against a centuries-old concept that dictates your entire existence. You're just too stupid to understand how society was constructed. You can pretend that your reality is special and sweet and exists in a different universe, but by doing so, you're just another alt-reich lunatic that the rest of us ignore. Repeating untruths doesn't change what's real. You would do well to remember that.
 
You're an actual idiot and a liar, although I'm not sure which one you're more of. That was never the intention of the Second Amendment, and not one single person claimed otherwise.

"Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action; consequently, that the specification of powers is a limitation of the purposes for which they may raise money."
-letter to Albert Gallatin (June 16, 1817)

The right of the people to keep and bear arms has been recognized by the General Government; but the best security of that right after all is, the military spirit, that taste for martial exercises, which has always distinguished the free citizens of these States....Such men form the best barrier to the liberties of America — Gazette of the United States, October 14, 1789.

There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787)

And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms....The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. — Thomas Jefferson in a letter to William S. Smith in 1787.

The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people; or of peaceable assemblies by them, for any purposes whatsoever, and in any number, whenever they may see occasion. —ST. GEORGE TUCKER'S BLACKSTONE

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government. — Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist (#28)

As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms. — Tench Coxe in `Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution' under the Pseudonym "A Pennsylvanian" in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1.

The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed;... — Thomas Jefferson to Justice John Cartwright, 1824. ME 16:45.

That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms... — Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87

The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them. — Zachariah Johnson, 3 Elliot, Debates at 646

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them. — George Mason, during Virginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution (1788)

The prohibition is general. No clause in the Constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give to Congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretense by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both. — William Rawle, A View of the Constitution 125-6 (2nd ed. 1829)
 
There is no freedom my dear when you are randomly killed by a firearm. Gun deaths in this country went up by 70% between 2011 and 2021. Please dont pretend to be a constitutional expert, your interpretation is based solely on your hate not on the constitution your president wants to outlaw, and which you dont seem to disagree with.

the founders believed that it was better for freedom and liberty if 10 guilty men were to go free, than to see one innocent imprisoned falsely. Why do you believe that this belief would not carry over to all others?

your 'trump is my president' reference is meaningless.......you believe what you need to believe though, since it's the only thing you have.
 
Do you park inside the lines of the stall you're allowed to use for a short time? Do you stand behind the person who arrived at the bank teller before you or do you just walk up to the counter? Do you put the gas pump back in its holder when you're done using it? Do you obey speed limits? Do you keep quiet while watching a movie in a theater?

DumberThanAnyRandomBitch, you're arguing against a centuries-old concept that dictates your entire existence. You're just too stupid to understand how society was constructed. You can pretend that your reality is special and sweet and exists in a different universe, but by doing so, you're just another alt-reich lunatic that the rest of us ignore. Repeating untruths doesn't change what's real. You would do well to remember that.

you would do well to remember that, just because most of society lives their lives according to politeness, courtesy, and peace with their fellow man/woman, does not mean that an invisible fucking contract was created and signed..........

you're just another idiot parroting totalitarian talking points because you worship government and fear your fellow American
 
the founders believed that it was better for freedom and liberty if 10 guilty men were to go free, than to see one innocent imprisoned falsely. Why do you believe that this belief would not carry over to all others?

your 'trump is my president' reference is meaningless.......you believe what you need to believe though, since it's the only thing you have.

Trump comments have been listed here several times. Just because you pretend they dont exist does change anything. Under on of your screen names you even agreed with him. To call his comments "meaningless' just shows how you lick his balls every day.
 
Trump comments have been listed here several times. Just because you pretend they dont exist does change anything. Under on of your screen names you even agreed with him. To call his comments "meaningless' just shows how you lick his balls every day.

1. I have no other screen names, or 'socks' as they are called......believing that I do is stupidity on your part. If you need proof, ask 'thatowlwoman' or damo.
2. that moron evince found ONE post where I said 'go get em trump', in a PURELY sarcastic post about calexit, comparing it to the liberals bullshit about brexit and texit........If you need to avoid context to make yourself feel better, so be it. it just means you're as wrong and moronic as evince.
3. the FEW times I agreed in a trump post was not necessarily my agreement with trump, but agreement with the law in question. Agreeing with a law is not supporting trump, it's supporting the law.
 
you would do well to remember that, just because most of society lives their lives according to politeness, courtesy, and peace with their fellow man/woman, does not mean that an invisible fucking contract was created and signed..........

you're just another idiot parroting totalitarian talking points because you worship government and fear your fellow American

That's the definition of the social contact, you imbecile. You live within it. You can deny it as much as you like (MAGAs tend not to know what's real and what's not), but denying that the sun shines on your head doesn't make it go away. It just makes you senile. You don't still have a driver license, do you?
 
That's the definition of the social contact, you imbecile. You live within it. You can deny it as much as you like (MAGAs tend not to know what's real and what's not), but denying that the sun shines on your head doesn't make it go away. It just makes you senile. You don't still have a driver license, do you?

you're projecting your idiocy on others. AGAIN, show us this social contract. It must be somewhere, otherwise how would we know what the rules are?
 
1. I have no other screen names, or 'socks' as they are called......believing that I do is stupidity on your part. If you need proof, ask 'thatowlwoman' or damo.
2. that moron evince found ONE post where I said 'go get em trump', in a PURELY sarcastic post about calexit, comparing it to the liberals bullshit about brexit and texit........If you need to avoid context to make yourself feel better, so be it. it just means you're as wrong and moronic as evince.
3. the FEW times I agreed in a trump post was not necessarily my agreement with trump, but agreement with the law in question. Agreeing with a law is not supporting trump, it's supporting the law.

Here you go, handjob
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html
 
1. I have no other screen names, or 'socks' as they are called......believing that I do is stupidity on your part. If you need proof, ask 'thatowlwoman' or damo.
2. that moron evince found ONE post where I said 'go get em trump', in a PURELY sarcastic post about calexit, comparing it to the liberals bullshit about brexit and texit........If you need to avoid context to make yourself feel better, so be it. it just means you're as wrong and moronic as evince.

3. the FEW times I agreed in a trump post was not necessarily my agreement with trump, but agreement with the law in question. Agreeing with a law is not supporting trump, it's supporting the law.

To the first part I bolded above, that’s an insult of epic proportions.

To the second part, your point #3, … I fail to see why people can’t understand that. For instance, I was for Biden’s infrastructure bill. You can call it the Democrat in me if you like, but that doesn’t mean I’m “Ridin’ with Biden.”
 
Back
Top