Hunter Bidens Corporate Board Roles...

QP!

QP!

Verified User
Oh wait, @Damocles and his fellow magats will have no comment on this and will pretend they do not see this thread because they never did give a crap about this type of issue other than as a weapon against Biden.


Donald Trump Jr.’s new career: advising companies​

From mixed martial arts to prediction markets and drones, the president’s eldest son is being paid to provide his counsel to eight companies and counting​


Donald Trump Jr.’s insights and expertise are in demand across a range of ambitious but little-known companies. He’s now advising businesses with operations spanning mixed martial arts, prediction markets, investment banking, drone manufacturing, gun sales and online marketplaces.

Since his father won the presidential election in November 2024, Trump Jr. has become an adviser to eight companies. ...

----------------

Donald Trump Jr.’s Expanding Business: After Joining 2nd New Board, U.S. Contracts Followed​


Unusual Machines is at least the second company that appears to have activated an advisory board specifically to give a Trump a role, placing Donald Trump Jr. on the board in November 2024—and granting him shares worth millions—then announcing at least $15.2 million in military-linked orders, including a direct U.S. Army buy...
 
Walt said:
The open corruption of trump is unbelievable.
Click to expand...
I am glad to see @Damocles did step up and comment on this and show his outrage and disdain is not simply a partisan thing and that he does not suffer TDS that makes him ignore everything the Trump family does.

Good to see he is as balanced as he pretends to be.

Oh... wait... :rofl2:
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Could you give us, say, three examples of this "unbelievable" open corruption?
Click to expand...
There are more than 3 in his crypto, meme coins, and NFT's just using the magat definition of what constituted "corruption" in Hunter Biden selling his paintings for high dollar amounts and the claim by Magats that Joe somehow benefited by it ...'thus corruption'.

So unless you are raging hypocrite you must recognize Trump getting his worthless crypto, meme coins and NFT's purchased DIRECTLY, is far worse and more corrupt than what you said with regards to Hunter.

You are not a hypocrite are you Terry? You are not just going to throw out some specious and stupid argument why Trump is ok to take all that money directly while Hunter was wrong to take it due to indirect benefits to Joe... are you?
 
Taichiliberal said:
Could you spare us all you insipidly stubborn willful ignorance. No matter how many times it's done, you'll just deny and lie for your Cheeto Jeezus. This is why the recent blue wave happened in recent elections .. the people are waking up and not buying the magat BS anymore.
Click to expand...
Oh, so you can spam the board endlessly with "Trump is evil!" sort of stuff without ever giving a single example of how he's evil and expect everyone to swallow your bullshit? Well, unless you have concrete examples that you can give with some FACTS attached, you got nothing but a terminal case of TDS going.
 
QP! said:
There are more than 3 in his crypto, meme coins, and NFT's just using the magat definition of what constituted "corruption" in Hunter Biden selling his paintings for high dollar amounts and the claim by Magats that Joe somehow benefited by it ...'thus corruption'.

So unless you are raging hypocrite you must recognize Trump getting his worthless crypto, meme coins and NFT's purchased DIRECTLY, is far worse and more corrupt than what you said with regards to Hunter.

You are not a hypocrite are you Terry? You are not just going to throw out some specious and stupid argument why Trump is ok to take all that money directly while Hunter was wrong to take it due to indirect benefits to Joe... are you?
Click to expand...
Merchandizing, which is what you're talking about here, is often little more than a legal scam to get people to pay into buying products that aren't worth the price being asked. Sports are a prime example of this. Bagman's paintings were closer to a true scam as the only buyers were persons wanting to give him money for his legal defense because his daddy was president.

Some of that goes on with Trump jr. too. The whole of political contributions is based on that sort of 'Pay for access' thinking. You need to do better than something that's just marginally questionable.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Merchandizing, which is what you're talking about here, is often little more than a legal scam to get people to pay into buying products that aren't worth the price being asked. Sports are a prime example of this. Bagman's paintings were closer to a true scam as the only buyers were persons wanting to give him money for his legal defense because his daddy was president.

Some of that goes on with Trump jr. too. The whole of political contributions is based on that sort of 'Pay for access' thinking. You need to do better than something that's just marginally questionable.
Click to expand...

So what value do you put on the Trump trading cards and NFT super hero images of himself he sold since you are now pretending they were real merchandise and not just "...a legal scam to get people to pay into buying products that aren't worth the price being asked..."

How are Trumps NFT and Trading cards worth more than a painting?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Oh, so you can spam the board endlessly with "Trump is evil!" sort of stuff without ever giving a single example of how he's evil and expect everyone to swallow your bullshit? Well, unless you have concrete examples that you can give with some FACTS attached, you got nothing but a terminal case of TDS going.
Click to expand...
Get you terminology straight, gumby. My PERIODIC posts and their contents do not fit the definition of "spamming". If you can prove otherwise, then put up or shut up. www.issueone.org/articles/the-corruption-chronicles/
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Merchandizing, which is what you're talking about here, is often little more than a legal scam to get people to pay into buying products that aren't worth the price being asked. Sports are a prime example of this. Bagman's paintings were closer to a true scam as the only buyers were persons wanting to give him money for his legal defense because his daddy was president.

Some of that goes on with Trump jr. too. The whole of political contributions is based on that sort of 'Pay for access' thinking. You need to do better than something that's just marginally questionable.
Click to expand...
Lets be specific Terry to avoid you being a hypocrite as i am sure you do not want to be that. :rofl2:

If Hunter Bidens paintings were a legal scam, and pay for access (indirect to Joe) because you can see they have no value then what value do you think these NFTs below, sold by Trump have, and why do you not think they gave DIRECT access and not just indirect?

p-90825656-trump-nft-trading-cards.jpg


And note Trump has sold such stuff (NFT's, bibles, trading cards, etc) when both in and out of office constantly so you cannot worm out of it that way.
 
QP! said:
So what value do you put on the Trump trading cards and NFT super hero images of himself he sold since you are now pretending they were real merchandise and not just "...a legal scam to get people to pay into buying products that aren't worth the price being asked..."

How are Trumps NFT and Trading cards worth more than a painting?
Click to expand...
They sold at market value. That is, people--unknown to Trump unless you can prove otherwise--bought his overpriced crap for whatever reason. Different from Bagman's paintings that often sold to buyers known to him or direct associates. The second he went back to nobody status as daddy was out of office, his paintings suddenly had no real value anymore.


www.theartnewspaper.com

No one wants my art, sulks Hunter Biden

Sales of Joe Biden’s son’s artworks have nosedived since his father left office
www.theartnewspaper.com www.theartnewspaper.com


When Trump leaves office, his crap will still have some market value simply because he'll still have some skin in the game unlike Bagman who's now a nobody and roughly $15 million in debt that he can't pay off. Yes, the guy is a merchandiser.

What does a merchandiser do? - CareerExplorer

A merchandiser is responsible for planning, coordinating, and executing strategies to promote and sell products within a retail environment. This role involves a combination of marketing, sales, and visual presentation skills to maximize product visibility and drive consumer interest...
www.careerexplorer.com www.careerexplorer.com
 
QP! said:
Lets be specific Terry to avoid you being a hypocrite as i am sure you do not want to be that. :rofl2:

If Hunter Bidens paintings were a legal scam, and pay for access (indirect to Joe) because you can see they have no value then what value do you think these NFTs below, sold by Trump have, and why do you not think they gave DIRECT access and not just indirect?

p-90825656-trump-nft-trading-cards.jpg


And note Trump has sold such stuff (NFT's, bibles, trading cards, etc) when both in and out of office constantly so you cannot worm out of it that way.
Click to expand...
That's the point. Trump sells and merchandizes himself as a product, if you will, and has been doing that for decades. Warren Buffet is much the same way in a much narrower market, as another example. That's not to say Trump's 'stuff' is any good. I see it as grossly overpriced crap. But there are fools with more money than sense... Always has been, always will be.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
That's the point. Trump sells and merchandizes himself as a product, if you will, and has been doing that for decades. Warren Buffet is much the same way in a much narrower market, as another example. That's not to say Trump's 'stuff' is any good. I see it as grossly overpriced crap. But there are fools with more money than sense... Always has been, always will be.
Click to expand...
GMAFB! He is using his position as POTUS to sell merchandise ti enrich his personal coffers managed by his family (of some he appointed positions in his administration). You maga clowns would wail if Obama's kids did a curb side lemonade stand!
 
Taichiliberal said:
GMAFB! He is using his position as POTUS to sell merchandise ti enrich his personal coffers managed by his family (of some he appointed positions in his administration). You maga clowns would wail if Obama's kids did a curb side lemonade stand!
Click to expand...
It's not like it's new. Celebrity sells. Remember Carter's brother or whatever selling "Billy Beer?" Same thing.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
They sold at market value. That is, people--unknown to Trump unless you can prove otherwise--bought his overpriced crap for whatever reason. Different from Bagman's paintings that often sold to buyers known to him or direct associates. The second he went back to nobody status as daddy was out of office, his paintings suddenly had no real value anymore.


www.theartnewspaper.com

No one wants my art, sulks Hunter Biden

Sales of Joe Biden’s son’s artworks have nosedived since his father left office
www.theartnewspaper.com www.theartnewspaper.com


When Trump leaves office, his crap will still have some market value simply because he'll still have some skin in the game unlike Bagman who's now a nobody and roughly $15 million in debt that he can't pay off. Yes, the guy is a merchandiser.

What does a merchandiser do? - CareerExplorer

A merchandiser is responsible for planning, coordinating, and executing strategies to promote and sell products within a retail environment. This role involves a combination of marketing, sales, and visual presentation skills to maximize product visibility and drive consumer interest...
www.careerexplorer.com www.careerexplorer.com
Click to expand...
Ya but you are just spouting meaningless words.

Hunters art work as every bit as 'market value' as Trump meme stuff, meaning there was ZERO true market value, proven by how the person buying them found worthless for resale almost immediately after. So people bought both their crap for "whatever reason", unless you can prove otherwise.

If you can simply state Trump NFT's will have some value after he leaves office, then i can simply say Hunter's art will as well. As it is pure speculation that there is some buyer out there for a useless digit picture when you have no basis to say so other than your own belief.

More importantly it is almost certainly illegal for Trump to have done of it whereas as it was only 'ethically awkward' for Hunter to do it. There is no law preventing kids of famous people (politicians, rock stars, movie stars) profiting off their family name. There are laws against a sitting POTUS doing so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top