Hunter Biden special counsel to seek indictment on gun charges

QP! said:
That is such a stupid question.

And it proves my point.

There is nothing you or anyone can do, NOTHING, that people will grift off their 'Name' or 'Relationship' to a powerful person.

Stupid people (ie you) can be convinced that alone is a crime, when it is NOT. But a stupid person (ie you) will say 'but... but would he get that opportunity if not for his name?


It is the politics of stupidity. Play on people's pettiness and jealousy.

- Neil Bush
- Donald Nixon
- Billy Carter
- Roger Clinton
- Hunter Biden

and countless other POTUS and Governor relations, profit off their name and/or proximity (ex business partner becomes lobbyist) and IT IS NOT ILLEGAL and we can DO NOTHING ABOUT IT.

It is not enough to say 'it stinks', 'it looks bad', 'why else are they paying them'...

And instead what you have to do is PROVE the person who gained power broke some law in dealing with them.

You guys have NOTHING on the second part but just keep pointing to how bad part 1 smells as if that is enough. It is not.
Click to expand...

Well said!
 
TOP said:
I'm sure Hunter's going to speak up soon and clear up the whole mess..
Click to expand...

Why should Hunter clear things up when his continued silence allows GOP shills to embarrass themselves day after day, week after week with their repeated mantra of the "Biden crime family" despite their total lack of proof?
 
ExpressLane said:
So remind me again what product or service worth millions did the Biden crime family sell?
Click to expand...

Ok.

Just don't blame me when again you are too stupid to understand the below and ask to be told agian.


-


When a person achieves the position of POTUS or Governor (or various others of power), the grifting family member, friends prior associates sell 'name' and proximity' to the person in power.


The entire LOBBYING business is based on that. It is not illegal to get hired as a lobbyist but politicians and the lobbyist can commit crimes if they engage in ways that are against law.

I need you to read that last sentence and get someone above Grade 3 to help you with the words you do not understand.

- Neil Bush
- Donald Nixon
- Billy Carter
- Roger Clinton
- Hunter Biden

And COUNTLESS OTHERS all got paid money for their name and proximity to someone in power.

THERE IS NOTHING ILLEGAL IN THAT.

You would have to provide proof (FACT) that George Bush did something illegal with Neil, Richard Nixon did something illegal with Donald, Jimmy Carter did something illegal with Billy, Bill Clinton did something illegal with Roger and Joe Biden did something illegal with Hunter.

In NONE of those cases has a shred of evidence beyond their relations been presented and that is why NONE OF THEM got charged for having grifting family members
 
ZappasGuitar said:
From where I stand, the only idiots are the ones who continue to claim "Biden corruption" without any credible links to corroborate what they allege.
Click to expand...

And the fact these Trump Derps here won't send this 'Proof' to James COmer so that when he is pressed, time and again, on Conservative news shows, whether they have a single piece of 'proof' they can can show and his reply is 'no, but we are working on it', he could instead show them the proof.


What i am starting to suspect is that the serps here are actually deep State democrats. BIden plants and fans. They have all this clear proof and yet they are hiding it. They won't share any of it with any of us here and they won't send it to Comer. They are holding it tight to protect Biden.
 
QP! said:
And the fact these Trump Derps here won't send this 'Proof' to James COmer so that when he is pressed, time and again, on Conservative news shows, whether they have a single piece of 'proof' they can can show and his reply is 'no, but we are working on it', he could instead show them the proof.


What i am starting to suspect is that the serps here are actually deep State democrats. BIden plants and fans. They have all this clear proof and yet they are hiding it. They won't share any of it with any of us here and they won't send it to Comer. They are holding it tight to protect Biden.
Click to expand...

JPP's GOP shills are nothing but angry, vengeful crybabies out for payback because Democrats embarrassed their Messiah Trump by impeaching him not once, but TWICE!
 
Phantasmal said:
My friends son was recently busted in Oklahoma for having a gun and a pound of marijuana, he got 5 years probation.
Click to expand...
These cases rarely get prosecuted. Which is why Biden is anxious to go to court instead of renegotiating a deal.
 
ExpressLane said:
Are you kidding me? They already let the statute of limitations expire on the most serious charges the income tax evasion charges. Hunter paid zero taxes on his Burisma income. Then he deducted the money he spent on prostitutes and he deducted a sex club as a company golf club membership and so far they aren't going after tax evasion
Click to expand...
Liar. He paid back taxes years ago. This is not even a prosecutable offense.
 
Althea said:
Liar. He paid back taxes years ago. This is not even a prosecutable offense.
Click to expand...

IDIOT he never paid his 2014 and 2015 taxes he owed on his Burisma income. His most recent taxes included deductions for money he paid to prostitutes and a false deduction for a company golf membership that was actually a deduction for a sex club. The IRS allows for simple mistakes but attempts to evade are considered felonies even if you pay the money back. He only recently paid the money back but they still could charge him with a felony on his recent tax issues.
 
Althea said:
Liar. He paid back taxes years ago. This is not even a prosecutable offense.
Click to expand...

Not sure of all the details, but Hunter is certainly guilty on the tax charges and felony gun possession. IMO, 6-12 months in prison would be good for him.
 
ExpressLane said:
Court of Appeals not the SC we shall see what the SC says. 5th Circuit Court of appeals is overturned 72% of the time.
Click to expand...
1) The court cited a recent SC ruling

2) Do you honestly believe that this rogue SC is going to rule against gun owners?
 
ExpressLane said:
Court of Appeals not the SC we shall see what the SC says. 5th Circuit Court of appeals is overturned 72% of the time.
Click to expand...

The SC ruled that because framers did not consider banning wife beaters from having guns, it was unconstitutional to do so now.

The SC did not consider women had no rights and were considered property at that point so of course they would not prohibit gun ownership from those who beat their wife, as that was legal to do.


The framers also had no prohibition about drug users getting guns.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top