Hundreds of Occupy D.C. Protesters Block Conservatives From Leaving Summit

Onceler said:
Eh; that's not really fooling anyone. At least on this board, there is a pretty crazy obsession w/ the OWS thing, and it clearly bugs some of you....
Click to expand...

LMAO... you mean like the Tea Party obsession of so many on the far left on this board?

Thus far its not even close. Most of it seems to be retaliatory for all the Tea Party bashing threads.
 
apple0154 said:
It was wrong not to let her out. That said, I wonder why the other people at the summit didn't carry her down the stairs. I mean what kind of people would attend a summit, see a lady in a wheelchair unable to exit the building through a specific door, then just leave themselves.....Oh, wait. I know. People who believe in self-reliance. People who believe helping is detrimental. People who believe assisting others is really harming others.

While blocking the door was wrong it did show exactly what the people who attended the summit are like.
Click to expand...

Wow, this is beyond pathetic. So desperate to shift blame for this debacle that you just make shit up? Do you know what happened inside? Or are you just projecting your idiotic views onto those inside the building?

We all know you would have left her behind or worse... told her that she was too privileged and redistributed her chair to someone who was tired and wanted to sit down.
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... you mean like the Tea Party obsession of so many on the far left on this board?

Thus far its not even close. Most of it seems to be retaliatory for all the Tea Party bashing threads.
Click to expand...

Yep, like the TEA party threads (and I didn't start even one, btw).

As for "not even close," what are you smoking? The board has been inundated by OWS threads - most useless - since it started...
 
Onceler said:
Yep, like the TEA party threads (and I didn't start even one, btw).

As for "not even close," what are you smoking? The board has been inundated by OWS threads - most useless - since it started...
Click to expand...

We have had THREE YEARS of non stop Tea Party bashing by the left on this board. As I stated, NOT EVEN CLOSE.
 
Superfreak said:
We have had THREE YEARS of non stop Tea Party bashing by the left on this board. As I stated, NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Click to expand...

I assumed you were referencing an average per-day. Of course there would be more TEA threads due to the time elapsed. What a ridiculous way to compare.
 
Superfreak said:
We have had THREE YEARS of non stop Tea Party bashing by the left on this board. As I stated, NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Click to expand...

It's not the conservatives who vote against their own interests that are worried.
It is the 1%.
They were worried before the occupy novement, since they know they have been way out of line for way too long.
Now, everyone knows(except the dumb shits who routinely vote against their own best interests).

Try to deny it all you want, the 1% is nervous, and for good reason.
 
Onceler said:
I assumed you were referencing an average per-day. Of course there would be more TEA threads due to the time elapsed. What a ridiculous way to compare.
Click to expand...

I think somebody is forgetting what it was like when the first TEA Party protests came about... (((({{{}}})))) alone posted nearly as many threads about how they were "small", etc.

It isn't just longevity that makes them comparable.
 
Damocles said:
I think somebody is forgetting what it was like when the first TEA Party protests came about... (((({{{}}})))) alone posted nearly as many threads about how they were "small", etc.

It isn't just longevity that makes them comparable.
Click to expand...

I haven't forgotten. Is that the goal, then? To match what {{{{{}}}}}} has done?

Why didn't you just say so?
 
Onceler said:
I haven't forgotten. Is that the goal, then? To match what {{{{{}}}}}} has done?

Why didn't you just say so?
Click to expand...
Okay, first you say that there are more now than then, now you say the "goal" is to "match" {{{{{{{{{{{{}}}}}}}}}}}}...

Which is it?

Suddenly you remember there were a ton of TEA Party threads, but now it doesn't count because they were from {{{{{{{{{{}}}}}}}?

Rubbish, dude. Just get over it. There are a lot of threads, mostly in mockery of the anti TEA threads that people have had to read for some time.
 
Damocles said:
Okay, first you say that there are more now than then, now you say the "goal" is to "match" {{{{{{{{{{{{}}}}}}}}}}}}...

Which is it?

Suddenly you remember there were a ton of TEA Party threads, but now it doesn't count because they were from {{{{{{{{{{}}}}}}}?

Rubbish, dude. Just get over it. There are a lot of threads, mostly in mockery of the anti TEA threads that people have had to read for some time.
Click to expand...


Um....Damo? I'd love to see where I said that....
 
Also, Damo - re: your "suddenly you remember" line; I responded to SF that yep, it's like the TEA threads. My point was that it's the same thing.

But you read things in a strange, hyper-partisan sort of way. It's why when you say things like it was "bad Bush" every day during the Exxon Valdez, your observations are not to be trusted.
 
Return of Dune said:
It's not the conservatives who vote against their own interests that are worried.
It is the 1%.
They were worried before the occupy novement, since they know they have been way out of line for way too long.
Now, everyone knows(except the dumb shits who routinely vote against their own best interests).

Try to deny it all you want, the 1% is nervous, and for good reason.
Click to expand...

You are truly fucking ignorant of the facts.

1) You pretend conservatives 'vote against their interests'... that is simply fucking retarded. If anything it is the liberals that vote against their interest
2) The 1% is not a static group. It is constantly changing its make up.
3) The 1% are not at all worried by the idiotic demonstrations in this thread. NOT AT ALL.
 
Superfreak said:
Fine.... go and compare the number of tea party threads in early 2009, do a comparison.
Click to expand...

Sounds like a fun project, but I'll pass. Clearly, there were a lot, as there are a lot of OWS threads. Only a small % on either side are really valid "discussion-starters;" most of each are trolling. And obviously, there are obsessed posters on both sides regarding the respective groups.
 
Onceler said:
Sounds like a fun project, but I'll pass. Clearly, there were a lot, as there are a lot of OWS threads. Only a small % on either side are really valid "discussion-starters;" most of each are trolling. And obviously, there are obsessed posters on both sides regarding the respective groups.
Click to expand...

That I would agree with.
 
Onceler said:
Um....Damo? I'd love to see where I said that....
Click to expand...

I think one can find the inference in this post:

Onceler said:
I assumed you were referencing an average per-day. Of course there would be more TEA threads due to the time elapsed. What a ridiculous way to compare.
Click to expand...

Basically saying there were "less then than there are now"... I then point out that one poster alone had a ton of threads about the TEA Party... You then try to say that because that one poster posted a huge amount of threads we should ignore that and not count it....

Spin the wheel man, but don't pretend we're all playing that game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top