Human Rights Court Rules Life Support Cut for Infant

Explain your comment: "It has everything to do with your ideology. As a leftist, you have tied yourself to the cult of dead babies.

The left obviously believes in killing babies beyond just abortion, as evidenced by the exploits of Barack Obama in the Illinois legislature, and by your collective responses to this matter.
 
Here you go, phony islander. One of your own calling for deaths. Grind: "can't wait till people die when they get kicked off of takerCare :)"

You be sure to give him a cyber-spanking for that, ya hear?

Grind isn't even pro-life. Pretty sure he favours letting people die in numerous situations.
 
Oh, diapers. You nanny statists are such tools.

Nobody loves you, fuckface. That's why 50 of you perverts wouldn't even be missed. Hell, 50 million of you wouldn't even be missed. In fact, the country would actually start feeling relief at that point. ;)

Idiots like you would be back to living in caves savoring grubs and lichen before the end of the year.
 
What is Charlie's condition?

Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome stops the body's cells producing enough energy. There is no accepted cure. Charlie is the 16th known person in the world to have a strain called RRM2B. The other 15 have all died.

What is the US therapy?

It is a drug called nucleoside bypass therapy. It replaces deoxynucleosides, which are naturally produced in healthy people, to repair DNA.

Is that what saved US boy?

Yes. But six-year-old Art Estopinan has the TK2 strain, a variation of Charlie's condition, and is one of 83 recorded cases. While the therapy has kept him alive, he is still severely disabled.

Would it work for Charlie?

It has never been tried on anybody with RRM2B. The US doctor who has offered to treat Charlie said it would not repair brain damage, but might prolong his life.

Why do UK doctors object?

They don't think the therapy will work and they believe Charlie – who they say is brain damaged – is likely to be feeling pain.

Do his parents agree?

No. They say Charlie is not brain damaged and is growing stronger.

Who decides his 'best interests'?

Lawyers for Charlie's parents say it is no one's business but their own. But the guardian appointed by the High Court recommended death. The judges backed the doctors.

Why can't they take him to the US alone?

Charlie is in intensive care and cannot be moved without doctors' help.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4666114/World-reaches-Charlie-Gard.html
 
Last edited:
The left obviously believes in killing babies beyond just abortion, as evidenced by the exploits of Barack Obama in the Illinois legislature, and by your collective responses to this matter.

In Illinois?

When he called for all first born sons to be brought to him to die?

No.....wait.....that was the OTHER Kenyan, Herod...
 
What is Charlie's condition?

Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome stops the body's cells producing enough energy. There is no accepted cure. Charlie is the 16th known person in the world to have a strain called RRM2B. The other 15 have all died.

What is the US therapy?

It is a drug called nucleoside bypass therapy. It replaces deoxynucleosides, which are naturally produced in healthy people, to repair DNA.

Is that what saved US boy?

Yes. But six-year-old Art Estopinan has the TK2 strain, a variation of Charlie's condition, and is one of 83 recorded cases. While the therapy has kept him alive, he is still severely disabled.

Would it work for Charlie?

It has never been tried on anybody with RRM2B. The US doctor who has offered to treat Charlie said it would not repair brain damage, but might prolong his life.

Why do UK doctors object?

They don't think the therapy will work and they believe Charlie – who they say is brain damaged – is likely to be feeling pain.

Do his parents agree?

No. They say Charlie is not brain damaged and is growing stronger.

Who decides his 'best interests'?

Lawyers for Charlie's parents say it is no one's business but their own. But the guardian appointed by the High Court recommended death. The judges backed the doctors.

Why can't they take him to the US alone?

Charlie is in intensive care and cannot be moved without doctors' help.

Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top

His parents insist that he is not braindamaged?

Well, that settles it....

Btw, is this the same Magnanimous Trumpeter who is preparing to fuck over millions of Americans who have finally managed to get access to health care?
 
Idiots like you would be back to living in caves savoring grubs and lichen before the end of the year.
lol.

Caves are exactly where you moonbat hypocrites should already be dwelling.

Now stop disturbing the environment and go find yourself a nice little hole in the mountain. ;)
 
Last edited:
His parents insist that he is not braindamaged?

Well, that settles it....

Btw, is this the same Magnanimous Trumpeter who is preparing to fuck over millions of Americans who have finally managed to get access to health care?
a total shitbag health care program that was foisted on millions who didn't want it?

Get fucked, you tool.
 
His parents insist that he is not braindamaged?

Well, that settles it....

Btw, is this the same Magnanimous Trumpeter who is preparing to fuck over millions of Americans who have finally managed to get access to health care?

Everyone has access to health care, small head. You're talking about free health insurance.
 
a total shitbag health care program that was foisted on millions who didn't want it?

Get fucked, you tool.

As the Republican fight over health care has dragged on, Obamacare has become more popular with the public. In a Quinnipiac University poll conducted April 12-18, only 36 percent of voters said Republicans should try again to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and 60 percent said lawmakers should “move on to other issues.” Sixty-five percent of those polled said they disapproved of the way Trump was handling the issue.
 
Back
Top