HUGE!! Trump to end birthright citizenship!!!

[floridafan]

So you support the 2nd amendment as written? That includes "shall not be infringed".

Do you support the 14th amendment as written?

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

When a woman is on US soil they US has jurisdiction..

HAHAHA. What does that even mean you woolly-brained lib???

 

[Legion]

When a woman is on US soil they US has jurisdiction..

That's the historical interpretation. Hence the need for a change.

 

[floridafan]

That's the historical interpretation. Hence the need for a change.

If you want a change go through the proper constitutional provisions

 

[CFM]

She's mentioned that she can read what the 14th says while supporting birthright citizenship. However, she's also made it clear she support infringement upon the written word of the 2nd.

 

[Wolverine]

Hey DUMBASS! That means that he could DESIGNATE you, me, any enemy, any one who doesn't vote his way, NOT A US CITIZEN. Think about it.

As for Melania and her parents? I'm sure a PRESIDENT can make exceptions for models and chain migrate her parents.

No he could not as we are already citizens of the United states!

 

[Jarod]

Even the wingnuts Trump put on the S.Ct would not support such a thing.

 

[Wolverine]

If you want to Amend the 14th that would be one thing, but turning it over by executive order is pure fantasy.

Doesn't need amended it is simply being misused!

 

[Legion]

If you want a change go through the proper constitutional provisions

Obama seemed to think Executive actions and Orders were proper and constitutional. Embrace his legacy.

 

[CFM]

Do you support the 14th amendment as written?

Do you support the 2nd as written?

Would you have supported Jim Crow laws? None of them violated the 15th amendment.

I understand the intent of the 2nd and the 14th. You understand neither.

 

[Legion]

Even the wingnuts Trump put on the S.Ct would not support such a thing.

I love liberal predictions.

 

[floridafan]

Doesn't need amended it is simply being misused!

Just how is it being misused?

 

[CFM]

Obama seemed to think Executive actions and Orders were proper and constitutional. Embrace his legacy.

To FloridaFan, that only applied to Obama.

 

[MAGA MAN]

The United States is not a house. You and me are not family. It is a country with written laws. We follow those written laws. Or I do. You are an enemy of that nation.

Diplomats are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Indian tribes are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. In both cases, disagreements are handled state to state - we do not apply our jurisdiction to diplomats, we at worst expel them to their home country. And conflicts between the US and the Indian tribes were handled state to state, thus, the Indians were not subject to our jurisdiction. Immigrants present in the US, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. We can and do directly apply our legal authority as sovereign to them, we do not handle these things purely on a state to state basis.

c u in court.

 

[Legion]

To FloridaFan, that only applied to Obama.

I suspect that you are correct.

 

[CFM]

Just how is it being misused?

Not the intention of those that wrote the 14th. Why do you support using it in a manner for which it wasn't designed?

 

[MAGA MAN]

You literally believe your fuhrer can repeal the 14th amendment by fiat. Who gives a fuck what your legal opinions are? You are a supporter of arbitrary despotism and tyranny.

 

[CFM]

Even the wingnuts Trump put on the S.Ct would not support such a thing.

How about those that Hillary put on the Court?

 

[Wolverine]

Even the wingnuts Trump put on the S.Ct would not support such a thing.

Bet! Originally it was about making slaves citizens!

 

[CFM]

If you want a change go through the proper constitutional provisions

You mean like through Executive Order the way Obama did it? Do you support an EO by Trump on the same level you supported Obama doing it?