Huge Majority Want Obama's Birth Certificate Revealed

[LadyT]

no dumbass....i'm saying ib1's study is as relieable as an online poll....are you really this dumb or are you lying about what i said on purpose?

HEY DUMBASS

Did you read the thread the thread you were referring to?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/14/AR2008091402375_pf.html


"In experiments conducted by political scientist John Bullock at Yale University, volunteers were given various items of political misinformation from real life. One group of volunteers was shown a transcript of an ad created by NARAL Pro-Choice America that accused John G. Roberts Jr., President Bush's nominee to the Supreme Court at the time, of "supporting violent fringe groups and a convicted clinic bomber." "


A published study conducted by political scientists from Yale hardly seems like it qualifies as an online poll. But I'm not surprised you'd think it was the same.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

read to the end of thread stupid....you will see i use the reports own words to show that the study is not a sample of the general population as ib1 falsely claimed it is....

just as an online sample is valid for online purposes, ib1's stupid study is only valid for that study, not the general pop....

i give you the thread, you don't bother to read it to find what i'm talking about and you only make yourself look stupid....see what i get for trying to help you

 

[LadyT]

read to the end of thread stupid....you will see i use the reports own words to show that the study is not a sample of the general population as ib1 falsely claimed it is....

just as an online sample is valid for online purposes, ib1's stupid study is only valid for that study, not the general pop....

i give you the thread, you don't bother to read it to find what i'm talking about and you only make yourself look stupid....see what i get for trying to help you

Its a political survey, why would it have to representative of the "general" population? A substantial amount of people in the "general population" don't necessarily identify with any particular ideology. This was a study about ideologies.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Its a political survey, why would it have to representative of the "general" population? A substantial amount of people in the "general population" don't necessarily identify with any particular ideology. This was a study about ideologies.

read the thread....and then you will understand what i am talking about

 

[Cypress]

read to the end of thread stupid....you will see i use the reports own words to show that the study is not a sample of the general population as ib1 falsely claimed it is....

just as an online sample is valid for online purposes, ib1's stupid study is only valid for that study, not the general pop....

i give you the thread, you don't bother to read it to find what i'm talking about and you only make yourself look stupid....see what i get for trying to help you

So your contention is that a peer reviewed, scientific study by trained PhD researchers at an Ivy League school, is the same as an AOL online poll?


You didn't go to college did you, Einstein?. What grade did you drop out of high school in?

The survey sampled liberals and conservatives. The PhD dude would have been an idiot to sample the "general" population.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

So your contention is that a peer reviewed, scientific study by trained PhD researchers at an Ivy League school, is the same as an AOL online poll?


You didn't go to college did you, Einstein?. What grade did you drop out of high school in?

The survey sampled liberals and conservatives. The PhD dude would have been an idiot to sample the "general" population.

you're still missing my point....

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

and einstein....one the authors did not have his phd when he wrote the paper...but you're smart and knew that

 

[Damocles]

I wouldn't mind it just so we could get to the serious business of policy.

 

[LadyT]

you're still missing my point....

We got your point. You're an idiot who clearly has no understanding of what a focused study is supposed to encompass. But thanks for bringing the a thread where Ib1 whooped your ass. It just made it easier to make you look even dumber than you already are.



Hey Cypress, I'm doing a study on maxi pads next week. But instead of focusing on menstruating women, I'm going to focus on the "general population" so that its sciency enough for Yurt.

 

[Cypress]

We got your point. You're an idiot who clearly has no understanding of what a focused study is supposed to encompass. But thanks for bringing the a thread where Ib1 whooped your ass. It just made it easier to make you look even dumber than you already are.



Hey Cypress, I'm doing a study on maxi pads next week. But instead of focusing on menstruating women, I'm going to focus on the "general population" so that its sciency enough for Yurt.

LOL

Holy crap, when did you become a conservative??!!


Great idea LadyT. I'm sure Yurt will be able to explain how a maxipad study, which samples the "general population", will be able to incorporate men's experiences with maxipads.

You never know, a lot of republicans seem obsssed with diapers and crap. So for all we know, there could be a lot of men who are down with maxipads, or something.

Or what the fuck, instead of paying trained researchers and paying for experiments and peer review, the whole damn maxipad study could go out as an online AOL poll, and the shit could get done for free.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

We got your point. You're an idiot who clearly has no understanding of what a focused study is supposed to encompass. But thanks for bringing the a thread where Ib1 whooped your ass. It just made it easier to make you look even dumber than you already are.



Hey Cypress, I'm doing a study on maxi pads next week. But instead of focusing on menstruating women, I'm going to focus on the "general population" so that its sciency enough for Yurt.

i am just so shocked you would find ib1 one that debate....so shocked that you would agree that the study, which didn't prove anything other than people don't believe the media, applies to most conservatives when the report itself said it does not....

your bias is clear and if you had actually read the thread with an honest eye instread of bias, you would not be making the above statemetns...i'm just positive if that study has said that about liberals you would so agree and extrapolate it to most liberals like ib1 failed to do with conservatives....partisan h ack

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

double

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

why don't go into that thread and debate the points i raised instead of acting like a hack and proclaiming ib1 the winner when it is clear you did not read the full thread....

ib1 lost that debate hands down...i used the words from the study to debunk his false claims...

instead of talking about women having periods, go debate in that thread or is this more of you guys just slapping each other on the back and proclaiming yourselves the winner of anything conservative.....the liberals on this board have to be some of the biggest hacks on the net....instead of debating, you spend the majority of your time running around telling each how pwned this conservative or that conservative....

you guys are funny that way, so insecure

 

[LadyT]

why don't go into that thread and debate the points i raised instead of acting like a hack and proclaiming ib1 the winner when it is clear you did not read the full thread....

ib1 lost that debate hands down...i used the words from the study to debunk his false claims...

instead of talking about women having periods, go debate in that thread or is this more of you guys just slapping each other on the back and proclaiming yourselves the winner of anything conservative.....the liberals on this board have to be some of the biggest hacks on the net....instead of debating, you spend the majority of your time running around telling each how pwned this conservative or that conservative....

you guys are funny that way, so insecure

First off, you don't dictate a fucking thing that I debate. You made a claim in this thread that I suspected it to be full of shit - turns out....I was right. Ib1 pwned your ass and you just got schooled again.

The problem is that you clearly don't have much an educational background, because if you did, you'd realize how ridiculous you sound saying that an online poll is just as valid as the published university study you referred to.

You can call us hacks all you want, but it doesn't refute the fact that you are too god damn dense to understand that you don't need to sample the "general population" for every study.

 

[Cancel7]

Uh-Oh, Spurt Desmond (Mizz Desmond if you're nasty) is chewing up the scenery in this thread!

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

you already admitted in yoru failed thread that the original and the computer generated copy are not the same....here you are again repeating that lie that they are same....

and once again....HI has stated they have his original on file

good lord, why do you feel compelled to add so much fuel to the fire by continually spreading lies about this issue?

CNN reporters came to this conclusion, and I was quoting them. Apparently they were wrong, and I haven't repeated the news for several days.

 

[LadyT]

Uh-Oh, Spurt Desmond (Mizz Desmond if you're nasty) is chewing up the scenery in this thread!

Oohhh!!!! but why don't you go to the other thread and debate this?

Why are you saying it here........

waaaaaahhhhhhhhh

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

E=LadyT;479892]First off, you don't dictate a fucking thing that I debate. You made a claim in this thread that I suspected it to be full of shit - turns out....I was right. Ib1 pwned your ass and you just got schooled again.

let's see....a thread you won't read, won't debate in....and yet you can declare who won...lame

The problem is that you clearly don't have much an educational background, because if you did, you'd realize how ridiculous you sound saying that an online poll is just as valid as the published university study you referred to.

the study is bogus and has as much relevance as an online poll....had you read that thread and gone there to debate instead of arguing about here, you would see what i am talking about and not look so ignorant.

You can call us hacks all you want, but it doesn't refute the fact that you are too god damn dense to understand that you don't need to sample the "general population" for every study.

the report clearly stated it was NOT a sample...it is stupid for you to argue otherwise...

but i understand why you won't actually debate that thread, because you know if you spout that ib1 won the debate and back slap your buddy, that all your little friends here will conclude you won and slap your back in return.....why do you even try to make points and then admit you won't actually read what people are talking about? simply amazing....

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Uh-Oh, Spurt Desmond (Mizz Desmond if you're nasty) is chewing up the scenery in this thread!

oh look....just as i predicted....here is your fellow back slapper....

you guys don't even have to debate issues or present facts, all you have to do is make stuff up and proclaim yourselves winners without presenting any evidence or reading anything

you guys are just awesome!

 

[LadyT]

let's see....a thread you won't read, won't debate in....and yet you can declare who won...lame

There you go making shit up again.


The "debate" is pretty much settled then. You think an online poll has the same scientific validity as a published ivy league study.

hahahahah.......

man, I'm glad I'm not you.