Huge Majority Want Obama's Birth Certificate Revealed

Onceler said:
Actually, yeah. "Can't stand" and "hate" are basically synonymous.

I know you guys don't like to consider yourselves intellectuals, but there are times when you can take that a bit far....
Click to expand...

now there you go, hating on my IQ..please stop the haten..
 
Yurt said:
yes....showing the lies of the left and factual inaccuracies somehow makes me a bad person...you're just pissed because i showed you lied again about me...how more times do i have do this?

good lord...you're pathetic...someone tells the truth....but their crazy and a loser


seriously....you're beyond weird
Click to expand...


What "truth" have you told? What have you stated here regarding our exchange, what have I said that you can logically counter outside of just telling us all how wise you are, how wrong everyone else is, and how your moronic parroting of neocon talking points differ from the other anti-Obama clowns on these boards? Come, come Yurt.....the recorded posts do not support your claims, and your delusional repetitive stalls and BS fails also. You have to logically demonstrate where I am wrong and you are right. That is what a true, honest discussion is all about. Again.....if you want to be perceived as someone against the idiocy of the birthers and all who fly with them, then stop parroting their BS. Grow up.
 
Taichiliberal said:
What "truth" have you told? What have you stated here regarding our exchange, what have I said that you can logically counter outside of just telling us all how wise you are, how wrong everyone else is, and how your moronic parroting of neocon talking points differ from the other anti-Obama clowns on these boards? Come, come Yurt.....the recorded posts do not support your claims, and your delusional repetitive stalls and BS fails also. You have to logically demonstrate where I am wrong and you are right. That is what a true, honest discussion is all about. Grow up.
Click to expand...

^lol^

first you call me a liar and that i am wrong....i ask you to show one thing and you still can't...so now you've twisted it and put off on me....

i haven't parroted one so called talking point, all do is point out the truth about the issue, like calling your resolution meaningless and not proof of anything, obama has not shown his original, you can request a copy of the long form, HI did not get rid of their original documents etc....

all you have are ad homs and meadowmuffins....unless you come up with something else, i'm done talking about this issue with you
 
Yurt said:
^lol^

first you call me a liar and that i am wrong....i ask you to show one thing and you still can't...so now you've twisted it and put off on me....

Either stop lying or get some help with your delusions. You have YET to deal with the FACTS that I put forth regarding your regurgitation about Hawaii and Obama's birth record. As I demonstrated here: http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=481017&postcount=127

i haven't parroted one so called talking point, all do is point out the truth about the issue, like calling your resolution meaningless and not proof of anything, obama has not shown his original, you can request a copy of the long form, HI did not get rid of their original documents etc.... And this is EXACTLY THE SAME BS THAT THE BIRTHERS, THE NEOCON PUNDITRY AND EVEN SOME GOP POLITITIANS. Get your ass in gear, Yurtle old thing, because I'm tired of education dumb toots with basic logic.....the document that is on display is the one the Hawaiian state gov't issues as identification/proof for it's US born citizens. In effects, it's the equivalent of the OFFICIAL COPY OF A BIRTH CERTIFICATE you and I and the vast majority of American citizens use to as proof for such things as Soc. Sec., state ID's, driver license and passports. And since the State of Hawaii, the US State Dept and the US Secret Service have verified and approved Obama's citizenship, NOBODY has to prove anything to a bunch of disgruntled yahoos who are pissed that they lost an election. Grow up and deal with it.

all you have are ad homs and meadowmuffins....unless you come up with something else, i'm done talking about this issue with you
Click to expand...

Translation: Yurt just repeats his/her usual bullshit and then cops out. Typical, but no unexpected.(except for his/her slight plagiarism of one of my lines...shows his/her lack of originality).
 
Southern Man said:
This issue has legs, and will haunt Obama for the remaining 41 months of his presidency.
Click to expand...

The "issue" is just the frustrated rantings of defeated neocons and Hillary Clinton supporters who just can't deal with the reality that they lost an election. The more they continue, the worst it is for the GOP in the upcoming elections. Hell, even conservative Michael Medved concedes this is a "fringe element" issue that makes the Repubs look silly. But the insipidly stubborn neocon never knows when to quit....which is good for the Dems and 3rd party candidates across the board.
 
Taichiliberal said:
The "issue" is just the frustrated rantings of defeated neocons and Hillary Clinton supporters who just can't deal with the reality that they lost an election. The more they continue, the worst it is for the GOP in the upcoming elections. Hell, even conservative Michael Medved concedes this is a "fringe element" issue that makes the Repubs look silly. But the insipidly stubborn neocon never knows when to quit....which is good for the Dems and 3rd party candidates across the board.
Click to expand...

"The latest AOL online poll shows 82 percent of respondents..." This constitutes a "fringe"? :)
 
Southern Man said:
"The latest AOL online poll shows 82 percent of respondents..." This constitutes a "fringe"? :)
Click to expand...

Right.....and what was the exact question? How many respondents? And how does that "poll" rank with the rest of the population of the country?

Keep grasping those straws, Southie....you're doing EXACTLY what the Dems and Independents want! :clap:
 
Taichiliberal said:
Right.....and what was the exact question? How many respondents? And how does that "poll" rank with the rest of the population of the country?

Keep grasping those straws, Southie....you're doing EXACTLY what the Dems and Independents want! :clap:
Click to expand...
I'm not a big fan of these online polls, since they are woefully non-scientific. But for arguments sake, say the poll is off by 1/2. Does 41% represent a "fringe"?
 
Taichiliberal said:
Translation: Yurt just repeats his/her usual bullshit and then cops out. Typical, but no unexpected.(except for his/her slight plagiarism of one of my lines...shows his/her lack of originality).
Click to expand...

I ALREADY ANSWERED THAT POST YOU FUCKING MORON

GET A LIFE

I AM DONE TALKING TO YOU ABOUT THIS AS ALL YOU DID WAS REPEAT THE SAME LIES ABOUT ME....

i hope the caps make it clear to you :)
 
Southern Man said:
I'm not a big fan of these online polls, since they are woefully non-scientific. But for arguments sake, say the poll is off by 1/2. Does 41% represent a "fringe"?
Click to expand...

So in one sentence you dismiss the validity of online polls, then you insist upon discussing it as if it were valid to some degree? What you're proposing is the equivalent to debating how many angels dance on a pinhead.....which is just plain silly.

Next time, try not to contradict your own argument.....I'm embarassed for you! :o
 
Yurt said:
I ALREADY ANSWERED THAT POST YOU FUCKING MORON

GET A LIFE

I AM DONE TALKING TO YOU ABOUT THIS AS ALL YOU DID WAS REPEAT THE SAME LIES ABOUT ME....

i hope the caps make it clear to you :)
Click to expand...

so....yurt still working the birther angle hard?

good for him.
 
Yurt said:
I ALREADY ANSWERED THAT POST YOU FUCKING MORON

GET A LIFE

I AM DONE TALKING TO YOU ABOUT THIS AS ALL YOU DID WAS REPEAT THE SAME LIES ABOUT ME....

i hope the caps make it clear to you :)
Click to expand...


Translation: I just kicked this dope's sorry ass...and he can't stand it....so much so that he's TWICE now stated he's done talking to me about this.

Poor Yurt, another neocon parrot just losing his mind. :cof1:

[ame="http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=481900&postcount=169"]Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Huge Majority Want Obama's Birth Certificate Revealed[/ame]
 
Taichiliberal said:
So in one sentence you dismiss the validity of online polls, then you insist upon discussing it as if it were valid to some degree? What you're proposing is the equivalent to debating how many angels dance on a pinhead.....which is just plain silly.

Next time, try not to contradict your own argument.....I'm embarassed [sic] for you! :o
Click to expand...
Save your embarrassment for yourself. I didn't dismiss its validity, just its level of precision. Nice dodge, though.
 
Southern Man said:
Save your embarrassment for yourself. I didn't dismiss its validity, just its level of precision. Nice dodge, though.
Click to expand...

Let's look at your sentence, genius

"I'm not a big fan of these online polls, since they are woefully non-scientific." Right here, you are stating that these type of polls are not to be taken seriously, as YOU point out they are not very accurate (which is what the "science" is suppose to do for polls). But for arguments sake, Why? Why should I argue about something YOU yourself don't put much stock in? If the situation was reversed, YOU would keep repeating ad nauseum how absurd my position would be based on a source that's "woefully non-scientific".

Once again, you've painted yourself into a corner...and all the BS in the world won't change that fact. You're done here.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Let's look at your sentence, genius

"I'm not a big fan of these online polls, since they are woefully non-scientific." Right here, you are stating that these type of polls are not to be taken seriously, as YOU point out they are not very accurate (which is what the "science" is suppose to do for polls). But for arguments sake, Why? Why should I argue about something YOU yourself don't put much stock in? If the situation was reversed, YOU would keep repeating ad nauseum how absurd my position would be based on a source that's "woefully non-scientific".

Once again, you've painted yourself into a corner...and all the BS in the world won't change that fact. You're done here.
Click to expand...

Apparently you don't understand the difference between "accuracy" and "precision".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top