Huge Breaking News Peter Alexander NBC

I said the note is incidental, and that the claims by both sides are equally nonsensical if not true. Try to pay attention.

And swallowing bilge is the first requirement in becoming a Trumper.
I pay attention but what you wrote makes no sense. what "both sides" - there is the direct testimony on Tues he wrote the note
It's not incidental in terms of her veracity. she knowingly lied she wrote the note

and im not getting into a partisan stupidity squabble. Dems are on a sinking ship. Cooke has the Repubs picking up about 30 seats
enjoy the show .This is you last hurrah, Biden is at 38 RCP
 
Heard that earlier this evening.

Even if they do, it's not that big of a deal because she testified that she was told that, not that she saw it herself.

Doesn't call anything else into question.

It brings into question why the committee ever allowed her to enter hearsay evidence to begin with...
 
I pay attention but what you wrote makes no sense. what "both sides" - there is the direct testimony on Tues he wrote the note
It's not incidental in terms of her veracity. she knowingly lied she wrote the note

and im not getting into a partisan stupidity squabble. Dems are on a sinking ship. Cooke has the Repubs picking up about 30 seats
enjoy the show .This is you last hurrah, Biden is at 38 RCP

Statements not made under oath are not testimony. So far the only testimony is hers. Hand writing analysis will tell us who is lying, but otherwise the note is unimportant, unlike an out of control President going after the driver of his security vehicle and throwing food and dishes at the wall.
 
It brings into question why the committee ever allowed her to enter hearsay evidence to begin with...

It's a fact finding committee, not a trial.

Hence, the rules of evidence are not the same.

If another party wants to appear and rebut anything said, the committee welcomes them.

Like the Secret Service has said they'll do.
 
Peter Alexander
@PeterAlexander
�� A source close to the Secret Service tells me both Bobby Engel, the lead agent, and the presidential limousine/SUV driver are prepared to testify under oath that neither man was assaulted and that Mr. Trump never lunged for the steering wheel.

An unnamed anonymous source claims the driver is denying her testimony?

That is not very compelling

Why doesn't the driver himself publicly deny what she said, and why doesn't he himself say he is willing to sit for an interview with the Jan 6 commission?
 
Statements not made under oath are not testimony. So far the only testimony is hers. Hand writing analysis will tell us who is lying, but otherwise the note is unimportant, unlike an out of control President going after the driver of his security vehicle and throwing food and dishes at the wall.
impeaching a witness by her direct lies is bad enough, the Committee allows no dissent
there isn't any "cross" ( opposite party questioning, or bringing oposing witnesses)

It's a creature of Pelosi to go after Trump. It might work,but it doesnt matter in the long run
Trump's MAGA ideas are now MS Republican, and we are going after the establishmeet like McConnel

Populism is the winner ,
as the Dems are going to lose so badly, and no reason they will win 2024 with this economy
You might take out Trump, but Trump has a lot of baggage.. Electorally Dems are dead and MAGA on the rise
 
An unnamed anonymous source claims the driver is denying her testimony?

That is not very compelling

Why doesn't the driver himself publicly deny what she said, and why doesn't he himself say he is willing to sit for an interview with the Jan 6 commission?
SS agent and the driver have both said they will testify..I wonder if the Pelosi committee calls them?
 
impeaching a witness by her direct lies is bad enough, the Committee allows no dissent
there isn't any "cross" ( opposite party questioning, or bringing oposing witnesses)

It's a creature of Pelosi to go after Trump. It might work,but it doesnt matter in the long run
Trump's MAGA ideas are now MS Republican, and we are going after the establishmeet like McConnel

Populism is the winner ,
as the Dems are going to lose so badly, and no reason they will win 2024 with this economy
You might take out Trump, but Trump has a lot of baggage.. Electorally Dems are dead and MAGA on the rise

What a clinic on wishful thinking.

Just the time period until this November is an eternity in politics. But '24? To declare that Dems are "dead" and imply that the next election is already in the bag?

It's the kind of stuff desh was saying about the GOP at one time. Total denial of political history & reality. We're a centrist nation - not right, not left, and not MAGA.
 
The note is incidental, couldn't be more so. It makes no sense both Hutchinson and the committee invented the claim. It also makes no sense that Herschmann invented his claim. So something is missing in this.

Anyway, I'm less inclined to swallow crap than you or any Trumper.
Make a lot of sense if Hutchinson wants a job on MSNBS.
 
SS agent and the driver have both said they will testify..I wonder if the Pelosi committee calls them?

Not a chance. They'll just ignore that part completely and not call what's-her-name back for anything else. She's done the job the committee wanted--bad mouth her ex-boss.
 
Peter Alexander
@PeterAlexander
�� A source close to the Secret Service tells me both Bobby Engel, the lead agent, and the presidential limousine/SUV driver are prepared to testify under oath that neither man was assaulted and that Mr. Trump never lunged for the steering wheel.

A source? WTF? When you cannot name your source- YOU AIN'T GOT SQUAT! :laugh:

A source tells me that Donald Trump shit his Britches after learning that Joe Biden Whooped his ass in the 2020 election!
 
all hear say

No, she was a top advisor to Trump and Mark Meadows.

You really are a special kind of stupid, aren't you? What the fuck does her position as advisor have to do with hearsay?

It's still hearsay in a criminal trial. There are plenty of witnesses to corroborate anything that she offered second hand.
Did you miss this? Or are you just a moron?

This isn't a criminal trial. It's a hearing before Congress.

There are plenty of people who can show up under oath in order to dispute any claims.
Or this? Still a moron, aren't you?
It is not a criminal trial you stupid asshole.
I believe that was covered in toto. How did you manage to miss it, moron?

You really are a moron, aren't you?

You must be a Floridafan sock

If you think a hearing is a trial then you are a moron. Don't waste my time.
Your time would be better spent in threads that you actually comprehend.

What is it about an advisor that negates any second/third hand information from being hearsay?


Take your time. We'll wait for your response.
 
SS agent and the driver have both said they will testify..I wonder if the Pelosi committee calls them?
No they haven't.

An unnamed anonymous source claims they will testify their denial.

It's good news for the Jan 6 commission that you are opening the door to compel Trump's security detail to testify under oath.

Great news, actually. Whether or not Trump literally lunged for a steering wheel is small potatoes.

You are opening the door for the Jan 6 commission to probe Trump's security detail under oath about the entire range of Trump's activities and intentions in the events surrounding the attempted overthrow of America's duly elected government.
 
No they haven't.

An unnamed anonymous source claims they will testify their denial.

It's good news for the Jan 6 commission that you are opening the door to compel Trump's security detail to testify under oath. Whether or not Trump literally lunged for a steering wheel is small potatoes.

You are opening the door for the Jan 6 commission to probe Trump's security detail under oath about the entire range of activities and intentions of Trump in the events surrounding the attempted overthrow of America's duly elected government.

Trump can testify and straighten everything out. Oh, wait, Trump is a coward.
 
Back
Top