How will future President Perry deal with poverty?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date

Will President Perry solve poverty?

  • No, it's not the government's problem

    Votes: 1 33.3%

  • No, he won't be able to

    Votes: 2 66.7%

  • Yes, more tax cuts will make poverty history

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Yes, massive spending cuts will eradicate poverty

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    3
Damocles said:
Under the Obama Administration more are impoverished, that we give them "free" stuff doesn't change that reality. His economic policy, and job killing medical bill notwithstanding. Their very "salvation" takes the jobs from the breadwinners of their families. We absolutely cannot afford to keep this guy on the payroll. If he were CEO of any company that wanted to stay in business the board would have fired him long ago.
Click to expand...

"Job killing medical bill? Their very "salvation" takes the jobs from the breadwinners of their families?"

That has to be one of the wackiest things you've come up with.

Are you for real? Maybe they should get rid of food inspection. Just think of all the jobs treating people suffering from food poison. And those safety warnings on items. They're job killers, man! Crushed fingers. Getting electrocuted. Ingesting toxins. The list goes on and on.

If we want to drum up some medical business I suppose we could go back to lead paint, too. Maybe make some items from asbestos. That pays well! And I'm sure if we drop the price of cigarettes cancer clinics will see a boost in profits.

Let's get this country back to work. Damo for Economic Advisor!
 
apple0154 said:
"Job killing medical bill? Their very "salvation" takes the jobs from the breadwinners of their families?" That has to be one of the wackiest things you've come up with. Are you for real? Maybe they should get rid of food inspection. Just think of all the jobs treating people suffering from food poison. And those safety warnings on items. They're job killers, man! Crushed fingers. Getting electrocuted. Ingesting toxins. The list goes on and on. If we want to drum up some medical business I suppose we could go back to lead paint, too. Maybe make some items from asbestos. That pays well! And I'm sure if we drop the price of cigarettes cancer clinics will see a boost in profits. Let's get this country back to work. Damo for Economic Advisor!
Click to expand...


Damo would only provide medical treatment to those who could afford to pay for it, wouldn't he?
 
\\(\()/)// said:
Damo would only provide medical treatment to those who could afford to pay for it, wouldn't he?
Click to expand...

Actually I would prefer a plan more like the Japanese one rather than one that forces us into a one-size fits all stupidity that makes employers unsure and slow to hire.
 
apple0154 said:
"Job killing medical bill? Their very "salvation" takes the jobs from the breadwinners of their families?"

That has to be one of the wackiest things you've come up with.

Are you for real? Maybe they should get rid of food inspection. Just think of all the jobs treating people suffering from food poison. And those safety warnings on items. They're job killers, man! Crushed fingers. Getting electrocuted. Ingesting toxins. The list goes on and on.

If we want to drum up some medical business I suppose we could go back to lead paint, too. Maybe make some items from asbestos. That pays well! And I'm sure if we drop the price of cigarettes cancer clinics will see a boost in profits.

Let's get this country back to work. Damo for Economic Advisor!
Click to expand...

Inane, you only demonstrate that the past two years conversations immediately bounce off the wall of deliberate obtuse you've built to protect your ideological mentality. I prefer method that isn't policed by the IRS and doesn't involve the government telling a man that he must have coverage for pregnancy and women that they must cover their prostates...
 
Damocles said:
Actually I would prefer a plan more like the Japanese one rather than one that forces us into a one-size fits all stupidity that makes employers unsure and slow to hire.
Click to expand...

What kind of shape is Japan in economically, these days?
 
\\(\()/)// said:
What kind of shape is Japan in economically, these days?
Click to expand...

Why would that matter? I said I would prefer something "more like" not "exactly copied from"... I don't like their Debt, but then I don't like ours either, and the earthquake certainly didn't help them out. However they control costs, not just subsidize and socialize them paying less than half per capita while covering everybody, they don't use the IRS to police the system and you aren't forced into a one-size fits all utter rubbish that you must buy "or else"...
 
Damocles said:
Inane, you only demonstrate that the past two years conversations immediately bounce off the wall of deliberate obtuse you've built to protect your ideological mentality. I prefer method that isn't policed by the IRS and doesn't involve the government telling a man that he must have coverage for pregnancy and women that they must cover their prostates...
Click to expand...

Cute. But the bottom line is there are people who can't afford medical coverage, pregnancies and prostates notwithstanding.

Obtuse: not quick or alert in perception

That's another cute one. Actually, I and many others are quite alert when it comes to people saying things like "I know medical care needs to be revamped but I don't agree with a one payer system or government medical."

You keep saying you prefer another way just as others have been saying for the last 45 years? 55 years (Truman's time)? Maybe since 1935? Actually, it's been a lot longer than that.

Talking about obtuse when will people realize there is no other way? As I mentioned previously there have been committees and think tanks and studies and surveys and on and on it's gone with nothing getting done. At least Ron Paul's supporters were honest the other night and said let the guy die. Why can't you be just as honest and come straight out and say that instead of parroting "there is another way" when you know there isn't? Either people can go to a doctor/hospital without worrying about any fee (either one payer or the government ensures everyone has insurance which is basically the same thing) or there will be people without access to medical care.

Where are you having difficulty understanding such a simple, straightforward concept?

This has nothing to do with ideology. It has to do with honesty. If you don't think people should have access to medical care unless they can afford it then be man enough to state it in plain terms instead of saying there's another way when there isn't.
 
Elias Koteas said:
How does Obama intend to deal with poverty?
Click to expand...

barack-obama-credit-card.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top