How to Wiretap Your Political Opponents

tsuke said:
the scariest thing is they justified it using the steele dossier. This means you can pay someone to manufacture your own evidence then use that to wiretap the opposition.
Click to expand...
well it was more complex then that -but yes you are correct.
the steele dossier got bounced around and abused by Clapper and Brennan under the guise that Trump needed to know...know what? fake news?..

all this is SO complicated. I should write it down, we haven't talked much about it since the Syrian strikes-
my old mind tends to forget
 
Jarod said:
Don't draw there attention to that, they will melt like an orange slushy! Don't you know how fragile they are?
Click to expand...

150810103359-01-colorado-river-spill-restricted-super-169.jpg


Sad...
 
(3) Rice requested to unmask some of the names without knowing that the individuals in question were affiliated with Trump.
Click to expand...
she obviously had a darn good idea it was a Trump associate by the context.
and why was the unmasking going into overdrive post election?

This quote "she did nothing wrong" goes to illegalities -both the Republican and Dems committee peeps all agree.
It was the frequency of the unmasking that looks political. That coupled with the leakings is the problem

I'm going to wait till she is called,but I doubt there is any quid pro quo as I said before.
It's like the Clinton Foundation buy access -but the access in itself wasn't a quid pro quo.

and Comey is completely uninterested - so I doubt this goes anywhere.

But it's clear Rice was investigating ,and that is not her role
 
anatta said:
she obviously had a darn good idea it was a Trump associate by the context.
and why was the unmasking going into overdrive post election?

This quote "she did nothing wrong" goes to illegalities -both the Republican and Dems committee peeps all agree.
It was the frequency of the unmasking that looks political. That coupled with the leakings is the problem

I'm going to wait till she is called,but I doubt there is any quid pro quo as I said before.
It's like the Clinton Foundation buy access -but the access in itself wasn't a quid pro quo.

and Comey is completely uninterested - so I doubt this goes anywhere.

But it's clear Rice was investigating ,and that is not her role
Click to expand...

Nothing if not persistent.

Completely fabricated "scandal." Rice doing her job, and doing it within the limits of the law.
 
Thing1 said:
Nothing if not persistent.
Completely fabricated "scandal." Rice doing her job, and doing it within the limits of the law.
Click to expand...
well if nothing else dragging Rice's name thru the mud is a noble exercise. :)

She's pure evil; one of the harpies of Libya along with HRClinton and Samantha Powers
 
Darth Omar said:
Just thought it was amusing that a conspiracy theory enthusiast would make fun of a conspiracy theory lol.
Click to expand...

its not a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theory is Trump russia. People attempt to make a connection between Trump and Putin but the one who released the info is wikileaks and they have always leaked stuff. In fact without wikileaks there would be no point discussing Trump Russia. They have maintained from day 1 that it was a leak not a hack (his name was seth rich R.I.P.)

In here you already have an admission by the FBI that they wiretapped someone in the leadership of Trumps campaign. It is impossible not to surveil political information. Its like wire tapping podesta. You will get information about the campaign without even trying. Note that Carter is the ony FISA warrant we know about as well there could be more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top