How many times did Republicans mention Hillary?

christiefan915

christiefan915

Catalyst
Guess cons have anointed Hillary even though there are a few other Dems in the race. Fiorina's comments were especially ugly, IMO.

CHICAGO — Hillary Clinton was an inescapable presence in the room at the Republican debate in Milwaukee Tuesday night. Clinton’s campaign responded to the debate by that highlighted just how many times she was attacked by the GOP hopefuls: more than 40, which the campaign noted was far more than the number of references to “the middle class.”

“Republicans mentioned Hillary Clinton more than 40 times at last night’s debates but had close to zero to say about how they would lift incomes for American workers,” Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said in a statement. “This is the No. 1 economic challenge the next president will face, and Republicans have ceded the field.”

<snip>

The argument that Republican candidates are unconcerned with the middle class is clearly going to be a core message for Democrats heading into 2016. Democratic National Committee communications director Luis Miranda was backstage at the Republican debate on Tuesday. He claimed the Wi-Fi password in the spin room was evidence the GOP cared more about attacking Clinton than helping voters.

“It’s interesting that for them it’s about Hillary and for us it’s about hard-working people. It’s about the middle class,” Miranda said.

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/how-many-times-did-republicans-mention-hillary-180904320.html
 
christiefan915 said:
Guess cons have anointed Hillary even though there are a few other Dems in the race. Fiorina's comments were especially ugly, IMO.

CHICAGO — Hillary Clinton was an inescapable presence in the room at the Republican debate in Milwaukee Tuesday night. Clinton’s campaign responded to the debate by that highlighted just how many times she was attacked by the GOP hopefuls: more than 40, which the campaign noted was far more than the number of references to “the middle class.”

“Republicans mentioned Hillary Clinton more than 40 times at last night’s debates but had close to zero to say about how they would lift incomes for American workers,” Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said in a statement. “This is the No. 1 economic challenge the next president will face, and Republicans have ceded the field.”

<snip>

The argument that Republican candidates are unconcerned with the middle class is clearly going to be a core message for Democrats heading into 2016. Democratic National Committee communications director Luis Miranda was backstage at the Republican debate on Tuesday. He claimed the Wi-Fi password in the spin room was evidence the GOP cared more about attacking Clinton than helping voters.

“It’s interesting that for them it’s about Hillary and for us it’s about hard-working people. It’s about the middle class,” Miranda said.

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/how-many-times-did-republicans-mention-hillary-180904320.html
Click to expand...

And this upsets you?
 
christiefan915 said:
I've seen Bernie overtake her in some and be neck and neck with her in others.
Click to expand...

I've not seen those polls. 538 has her chances at over 70%.

I mean Republicans will jump for joy if Bernie wins the nomination and will have no problem turning their attacks onto him but the reality is Hillary is far far ahead.
 
christiefan915 said:
When I'm watching a repub debate I want to hear their own positions, not their feelings about Hillary.
Click to expand...

The ultimate goal of the Party primaries is to obviously pick a candidate but within that is who can win the election. And within that discussion is who the opponent is. Democrats talk about Republicans in their primaries. This isn't new.
 
christiefan915 said:
When I'm watching a repub debate I want to hear their own positions, not their feelings about Hillary.
Click to expand...

So in 2008 when the democrats mentioned Bush every five seconds it distressed you?

Why do you care about their positions? You aren't voting for any of them.

You sure are loaded with faux outrage
 
christiefan915 said:
I've seen Bernie overtake her in some and be neck and neck with her in others.
Click to expand...

i remember a year ago as your normal dummy self claiming that hilary might not run. lmao. You have disqualified yourself from any rational discussion of politics. Your brain is literally incapable of understanding these types of topics. Leave it to the big kids.
 
cawacko said:
The ultimate goal of the Party primaries is to obviously pick a candidate but within that is who can win the election. And within that discussion is who the opponent is. Democrats talk about Republicans in their primaries. This isn't new.
Click to expand...

christie has a very small brain and is unable to understand the point you just made. don't waste your time.
 
Grind said:
i remember a year ago as your normal dummy self claiming that hilary might not run. lmao. You have disqualified yourself from any rational discussion of politics. Your brain is literally incapable of understanding these types of topics. Leave it to the big kids.
Click to expand...

Put down the crack pipe, kill yourself already, and spare the rest of us from your misery, dopey. Maybe if your brain wasn't fried, you would have remembered this.

Smarter people than you, and that includes almost everybody, also suggested she might not run and gave their reasons for their opinions.

There’s a real chance Hillary Clinton won’t run for president. Here are five reasons why.

What would cause Hillary Clinton not to run for president?

4 Reasons Hillary Clinton Might Not Run For President, After All

CNN’s Crowley Has Very Simple Reason Why Hillary May Not Run in 2016

[video]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...n-wont-run-for-president-heres-5-reasons-why/
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.co...use-hillary-clinton-not-to-run-for-president/
http://www.bustle.com/articles/27772-4-reasons-hillary-clinton-might-not-run-for-president-after-all
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-crowley-has-very-simple-reason-why-hillary-may-not-run-in-2016/
 
I Love America said:
So in 2008 when the democrats mentioned Bush every five seconds it distressed you?

Why do you care about their positions? You aren't voting for any of them.

You sure are loaded with faux outrage
Click to expand...

You crack me up with the bit about "faux outrage." I'm rarely outraged but when I am, it's real.
 
we have real life voters


you fucks have to gerrymander and set up obstacles to voting to win elections
 
christiefan915 said:
Put down the crack pipe, kill yourself already, and spare the rest of us from your misery, dopey. Maybe if your brain wasn't fried, you would have remembered this.

Smarter people than you, and that includes almost everybody, also suggested she might not run and gave their reasons for their opinions.

There’s a real chance Hillary Clinton won’t run for president. Here are five reasons why.

What would cause Hillary Clinton not to run for president?

4 Reasons Hillary Clinton Might Not Run For President, After All

CNN’s Crowley Has Very Simple Reason Why Hillary May Not Run in 2016

[video]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...n-wont-run-for-president-heres-5-reasons-why/
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.co...use-hillary-clinton-not-to-run-for-president/
http://www.bustle.com/articles/27772-4-reasons-hillary-clinton-might-not-run-for-president-after-all
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-crowley-has-very-simple-reason-why-hillary-may-not-run-in-2016/
Click to expand...



just because people wrote a clickbait article to attract a dummy like you, doesn't mean they believed it. Of course the media will speculate. You see christie, there is this thing called advertising. You make money when people come to your website and read your articles. No one visits your website if you tell them the election narrative is already complete.

Anyone that thought for a second that hillary wasn't running is a grade a mouth breather.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top