How many JPP lefties have donated money to Jill Stein's recount effort?

[PostmodernProphet]

You're insane. There was no problem with hanging chads in 2008 or 2012.

I believe that was his point Chrispy.......

 

[Irish]

Talk about getting scammed

 

[Irish]

Come on admit it if you have. We won't judge.

If you have, I just thought I would let you know that you are getting screwed by her. Nothing she does is going to overturn this election. Want to know why? Well, I will tell you. You see, even if she manages to get Wisconsin flipped (unlikely), it won't matter.

Jill Stein isn't telling you that in Pennsylvania you can't just ASK for a recount. You have to go to court and show prima facie evidence that fraud or mistakes occurred. Trump won Pennsylvania by almost 70,000 votes. Who in their right mind thinks that is getting overturned.

The Clinton campaign says there was no fraud or hacking

The Obama administration says there was no fraud or hacking

Even the venerable computer scientists who are pushing this effort behind the scenes says there is no evidence of hacking or fraud.

BTW. Jill Stein has until tomorrow to challenge in Pennsylvania. So she better get cracking

So why does this matter? Well, unless Jill Stein can get the election overturned in all three states Donald J Trump is still our President.

Evidence? Who needs evidence. This recount is just a smoke screen aimed to deny Trump 270 EC delegates. Once again moron Libtards are getting conned. And once again by the people in their own party.

Also why the fuck does Jill Stein care? If she wanted Hillary so bad, why did she help defeat her?

 

[Ralph]

You're BAC. Disgusting.

Truth is often confused with HATE. In truth there is no such animal as HATE TRUTH. However there is the leftist answer to truth, its called political correctness. The suggestion being one should avoid presenting any kind of type if it has the potential to make others feel uncomfortable. Clearly....I touched a nerve by simple presentation of the an obvious truth.

 

[Ralph]

You're insane. There was no problem with hanging chads in 2008 or 2012. Obama won by big margins both times.

That is the point no? In Fla. it came down to 500 votes...within a STATE. Now you are suggesting the popular vote should count for something...and it does, at the state level, not at the federal level. And that recount? Why did cry baby Gore only want DEMOCRAT COUNTIES re-counted instead of demanding the entire state be recounted? Its the same message presented in this election. There was a landslide in the EC 306-232 RED over BLUE.....but the recount being demanded is not a national recount of all the close states ....they are calling votes within 1.2% close....the left wants only the BLUE WALL recounted. Why not the close races in New Hampshire were Hillary won...that was within the so called close range...why not Nevada? Why not ALL THE STATES? The only reason this recount is being attempted in not for an honest recount....but its a delaying tactic. One can tell if they began a fast and efficient recount in Wis.....if they make motion after motion and delay the process....HOPING that Dec. 13 will come and go without that one state formally being certified...regardless of the outcome, they hope to stall and sway the EC vote. Your guild are simpletons. Who do you think is funding this recount? No one but Big Daddy George Soros....and that is to continue to divide the nation instead of allowing it to heal. There is no way in hell for the left to STEAL over 70 EC votes....its just not possible. So what's the reason? Division.

And....306 to 232 is not a big margin for a presidential race where the democratic vote is calculated within each state as promised via the US CONSTITUTION (Article 4, Section 4, Clause 1)? Again...this is a representative republic....the only place that a true majority rules democracy exists is within each and every state with their own constitutions and common laws, depending upon the morality reflected by their citizenship. The UNION, the totality of the states was created by the Contract among those independent states called the US CONSTITUTION. Its not rocket science. Mr Trump won in a landslide....just look at the map, its a sea of RED.

And there is nothing Un-Constitutional about that landslide mandate. More states voted RED than voted Blue....and the people's voice spoke to the tune of 306 to 232, 535 total EC votes counting the non-state or none represented District of Columbia...and even with the "extra" votes that are not represented as a state....The RED VOTES overwhelmed the BLUE VOTES....in a representative fashion. That's just how a representative republic works...it can be no other way unless you want 2 or 3 states dictating policy to the other 47 states...then the election process would be a shame.

The only thing a "popular vote" demonstrates at the federal level...is the fact that there a great many "losers" that have freely chosen to live in large leftist population centers. My opinion? It has something to do with deadbeats and government handouts that are being used to purchase BLUE VOTES. Again...its not rocket science. RED represents a Work Ethic and the BLUE represents income redistribution from the RED STATES...i.e., free loading deadbeat votes.