How does it feel to support a president who is complicit in the murder of US troops?

anatta said:
no it was in a PDB not a "briefing" and it was 100% unreliable. turns out to be fake -
another Russian hoax you swallowed]
Click to expand...

Says who? Who says it was fake? You? Did you read the intelligence? No? You didn't read the Mueller Report either, and you lied about getting a mail-in ballot.

So why do you think anything you say here has any credibility, since you made the conscious choice to lie before?
 
Jerome said:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump...utin-because-he-thinks-its-fake-news?ref=home

President Donald Trump has admitted that he failed to mention U.S. intelligence that indicates Russia paid the Taliban to kill American troops during a call with Vladimir Putin last week. In fact, Trump says he has “never” brought up the issue with the Russian president apparently because he doesn’t believe the CIA.
The New York Times reported back in June that U.S. intelligence officials concluded “months ago” that a Russian military intelligence unit paid out for each U.S. or allied soldier killed. There is some disagreement in the intelligence community—the National Security Agency reportedly disagreed with the CIA’s findings.

But, since he had Putin on the phone, you might expect a U.S. president to at least ask about intelligence showing that Russia had incentivised Taliban militants to murder American troops. In an interview with Axios on HBO, Trump said he didn’t bother.

Asked why he skirted the issue with Putin last week, Trump replied: “That was a phone call to discuss other things, and frankly that’s an issue that many people said was fake news.”
Click to expand...

Whatever. You morons forfeited your right to bitch when your mouthpiece(aka the ny times)puked out classified, unvetted intelligence. Cry to the media.
 
LV426 said:
Says who? Who says it was fake? You? Did you read the intelligence? No? You didn't read the Mueller Report either, and you lied about getting a mail-in ballot.

So why do you think anything you say here has any credibility, since you made the conscious choice to lie before?
Click to expand...
Colin Powell says its "hysterical" coverage -right up your ally
 
anatta said:
Colin Powell says its "hysterical" coverage -right up your ally
Click to expand...

Trump's been briefed about this numerous times over a couple years.

So he knew about it, and didn't care because he is Putin's puppet. Instead of condemning Russia, he's trying to invite them into the G-8.

And you're toiling that baggage and will forever.

Remember a few months ago when you insisted COVID was a hoax that would simply just go away in the Spring, or that hydroxy would help it?

Did Herman Cain take hydroxy? Do you know?
 
LV426 said:
Trump's been briefed about this numerous times over a couple years.

So he knew about it, and didn't care because he is Putin's puppet. Instead of condemning Russia, he's trying to invite them into the G-8.

And you're toiling that baggage and will forever.

Remember a few months ago when you insisted COVID was a hoax that would simply just go away in the Spring, or that hydroxy would help it?

Did Herman Cain take hydroxy? Do you know?
Click to expand...
2 mentions is a PDB which was not credible
 
anatta said:
2 mentions is a PDB which was not credible
Click to expand...

PDB's are credible, and anything in a PDB is credible enough to rise to the level of POTUS.

Like how in August 2001, Bush the Dumber (the last Conservative President you carried water for) got a PDB warning of an imminent attack by bin Laden.

That attack happened less than a month later.
 
anatta said:
2 mentions is a PDB which was not credible
Click to expand...

So a "PDB" is a Presidential Daily Briefing, and the contents of a PDB are intelligence that has been vetted and is actionable by our Intelligence Services.

They're not going to brief the President on something that isn't true.

Now you're saying Trump was briefed of this plot at least twice.

So the Intelligence agencies thought the intel was credible enough to warrant the President's attention.

You are a traitor and a scumbag, if you're even an American...I have my doubts.
 
Trump has exposed his ugly ass again as a TRAITOR, and a Russian AGENT!

I am not sure anyone using common sense is surprised by this, as most Americans have realized this all along!
 
LV426 said:
PDB's are credible, and anything in a PDB is credible enough to rise to the level of POTUS.

Like how in August 2001, Bush the Dumber (the last Conservative President you carried water for) got a PDB warning of an imminent attack by bin Laden.

That attack happened less than a month later.
Click to expand...
sorry "actionable" was term
 
anatta said:
sorry "actionable" was term
Click to expand...

Move those goalposts, right?

So who told you that what's included in PDB's aren't truthful or vetted or credible?

Because you couldn't have come to that conclusion on your own...someone had to get you there.

So who was it?

NO ONE, YOU SAY????

Well, that would mean you've been bullshitting and lying and embellishing this whole time, like you did when you lied about getting a mail-in ballot.
 
LV426 said:
So a "PDB" is a Presidential Daily Briefing, and the contents of a PDB are intelligence that has been vetted and is actionable by our Intelligence Services.

They're not going to brief the President on something that isn't true.

Now you're saying Trump was briefed of this plot at least twice.

So the Intelligence agencies thought the intel was credible enough to warrant the President's attention.

You are a traitor and a scumbag, if you're even an American...I have my doubts.
Click to expand...
not actionable
 PDB's are somewhat distilled, but in some cases where there is an exigent need even non-actionable
intel is passed on as a FYI
so it was an FYI -duly noted,but not actionable in anyway

which is good -unlike Russiaphobes like you, we dont want to get into a needless conflict over unverified intel
 
anatta said:
not actionable
 PDB's are somewhat distilled, but in some cases where there is an exigent need even non-actionable
intel is passed on as a FYI
so it was an FYI -duly noted,but not actionable in anyway

which is good -unlike Russiaphobes like you, we dont want to get into a needless conflict over unverified intel
Click to expand...

That's not what you said before. And informing the President that Russia is paying bounties on US troops is wholly actionable; it requires the President to act in response. He chose not to, obviously because he is fearful of confronting Putin because Trump is a gigantic pussy, traitor, or both.

So who told you that a PDB doesn't contain actionable intel? Because you couldn't have come to that conclusion on your own.
 
Jerome said:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump...utin-because-he-thinks-its-fake-news?ref=home

President Donald Trump has admitted that he failed to mention U.S. intelligence that indicates Russia paid the Taliban to kill American troops during a call with Vladimir Putin last week. In fact, Trump says he has “never” brought up the issue with the Russian president apparently because he doesn’t believe the CIA.
The New York Times reported back in June that U.S. intelligence officials concluded “months ago” that a Russian military intelligence unit paid out for each U.S. or allied soldier killed. There is some disagreement in the intelligence community—the National Security Agency reportedly disagreed with the CIA’s findings.

But, since he had Putin on the phone, you might expect a U.S. president to at least ask about intelligence showing that Russia had incentivised Taliban militants to murder American troops. In an interview with Axios on HBO, Trump said he didn’t bother.

Asked why he skirted the issue with Putin last week, Trump replied: “That was a phone call to discuss other things, and frankly that’s an issue that many people said was fake news.”
Click to expand...

I never supported Obama
 
anatta said:
not actionable
 PDB's are somewhat distilled, but in some cases where there is an exigent need even non-actionable
intel is passed on as a FYI
so it was an FYI -duly noted,but not actionable in anyway

which is good -unlike Russiaphobes like you, we dont want to get into a needless conflict over unverified intel
Click to expand...

There is NOTHING in a PDB that hasn't already been vetted and determined by the Intelligence Community to warrant the President's attention.

You said that he got TWO briefings via PDB on this.

So that means TWICE the Intel Community raised this to his level, and TWICE he ignored it and did nothing.
 
LV426 said:
Move those goalposts, right?

So who told you that what's included in PDB's aren't truthful or vetted or credible?

Because you couldn't have come to that conclusion on your own...someone had to get you there.

So who was it?

NO ONE, YOU SAY????

Well, that would mean you've been bullshitting and lying and embellishing this whole time, like you did when you lied about getting a mail-in ballot.
Click to expand...
do your own damn research. all you do is yammer ,and I have to do it for you -asshole

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...nce-may-have-been-trump-brief-wasn-t-n1232498
Referring to the president, McCaul said: "I think the way the process works is that he gets briefed about three times a week on sort of actionable, credible items. And the decision was made that this was not at that point in time a credible, actionable piece of intelligence. And if at any point it did, it would be raised to his attention."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top