How do we fight modern day war, such as ISIS?

I think Islam cannot be saved anymore. There has to be a cultural front to the war where we encourage as many people as possible to convert to any other religion. Anytime we do that the terrorists get weaker. If for instance Islam was so small that only terrorists adhered to it then they would lose most of their special protections.

Islam is by far the largest religion in the world you fucking retard.

The ONLY solution is to leave them alone.
That is all they want from us.
 
I think Islam cannot be saved anymore. There has to be a cultural front to the war where we encourage as many people as possible to convert to any other religion. Anytime we do that the terrorists get weaker. If for instance Islam was so small that only terrorists adhered to it then they would lose most of their special protections.

If Muslims were as violent as you portray, we wouldn't stand a chance. Because there are hundreds of millions of them. Even if 10% of them were as violent as you portray, we wouldn't stand a chance.

It might be time to step back and reconsider your bias.
 
^ you could go in heavy (boots) if it was a counter-terrorism destroy and leave. The problem is once we do that we have a tendency
to want to stay and manage the aftermath -and whatever we do the regional states generally willnot.

The final endgame is Islamic reformation -agreed.

Most idiotic post of the internet age.
 
Islam is by far the largest religion in the world you fucking retard.

The ONLY solution is to leave them alone.
That is all they want from us.

If that is true then why are Saudi Arabia and Qatar funding the biggest worldwide mosque building program in history? You try building a church over there and see how you get on!!
 
If that is true then why are Saudi Arabia and Qatar funding the biggest worldwide mosque building program in history? You try building a church over there and see how you get on!!

A typical Brit empire-mourner who still wants to build Christian edifices in the heart of Islam. You'd think that the cluster-fuck you've made of Palestine would satisfy your craving for self-humiliation.
 
A typical Brit empire-mourner who still wants to build Christian edifices in the heart of Islam. You'd think that the cluster-fuck you've made of Palestine would satisfy your craving for self-humiliation.

Well Hamas Humper, in that case we should tell the Saudis to stop building mosques and fuck off back to the 7th century.
 
Go right ahead, Tory boy. Add it to your anti-foreigner rhetoric . What a mug you look already. Oi !
 
What qualifies you to judge idiot?
Nothing.
You are a war mongering fool.

We are NOT defeating ISIS byany means FOOL.

EVVERYSINGLE THING WE DO IN THE ME ENLARGES THE TERRORIST FORCES. YOU FUCKING IDIOT.

THE ENTIRE REGION IS IN FLAMES AND LONG WAR IS WHY.
shouting in caps doesn't mean you have anything to say...

we are rolling back ISIS -thre are qualifiers, but Ramadi is liberated, and in general ISIS is losing territory.
Talk is Mosul is next..but that's not until at least next year.

Which doesn't mean ISIS is vanquished, but it does mean that it's getting done without "US Boots" (Special forces exempted)
and regional players providing the boots. Iran/Iraq regulars, as well as Shiite brigades on on the ground.
The problem is lack of Sunni forces - but given the al-Maliki abandoned them after the Awakening - that isn't at all surprising.
That and the tilt to Iran, and purging the Iraqi army of Sunni officers.

Anyways.. for all your hyper-criticism that all I do is criticize Obama -there you go. He's doing about all he can.
It doesn't mean he gets credit for utterly missing ISIS crossing into Iraq.

ISIS_CIA_Convoy.jpg

This convoy entered Iraq in June 2014 -where was the US air force??

No Long war isn't the cause of terrorism, long war is the result of worldwide rise of terrorism ( sic)
 
The Russians have made it abundantly clear that THE TURKS have been assisting ISIS . ISIS started to lose as soon as the Russians cut their supply lines from Turkey. ISIS cannot survive as A MILITARY FORCE without assistance from this boil on NATO's ass. Defeating their ideology though will take a long time and a dramatic change of direction in the USA's support for Israeli criminality.
You won't see any such thing under Trump or Billary. ISIS will flourish under their moronic , self-serving foreign policy plans. Your vote for either of these diplomatic disaster areas will ensure the rapid spread of extremism- and it won't be Islamic extremism only, neither will it be confined to the Middle East.
 
Last edited:
Play dumb. You have mad skill at it.
asking you to construct a sentence without unknown modifiers is dumb?
I can't read your mind (a dark and dusty place)..are you saying we need to go into Libya??

The US has new bases in the east and west, but no..we do NOT need to go into Libya! ( but we probly will)

U.S. establishes Libyan outposts with eye toward offensive against Islamic State
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...-top-table-main_us-libya-615pm:homepage/story

American Special Operations troops have been stationed at two outposts in eastern and western Libya since late 2015, tasked with lining up local partners in advance of a possible offensive against the Islamic State, U.S. officials said.

Two teams totaling fewer than 25 troops are operating from around the cities of Misurata and Benghazi to identify potential *allies among local armed factions and gather intelligence on threats, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive mission overseas.

The insertion of a tiny group of U.S. personnel into a country rife with militant threats reflects the Obama administration’s worries about the Islamic State’s powerful Libyan branch and the widespread expectations of an expanded campaign against it. For months, the Pentagon has been developing plans for potential action against the group, which has at least several thousand fighters in the coastal city of Sirte and other areas. And the U.S. personnel, whose ongoing presence had not been previously reported, is a sign of the acceleration toward another military campaign in Libya.
 
Gaddafi would have ensured that there was no such entity as ISIS. Billary giggled when somebody stuck a knife up his ass.
 
Gaddafi would have ensured that there was no such entity as ISIS. Billary giggled when somebody stuck a knife up his ass.
Qaddafi did work with Brit's SAS ,and US CIA along those lines.. Hillary is dumb as a post Sec of State ( "we came we saw he died")
 
We can't fight them.
The government's under attack can.
They don't want to as they know it will tick off the rest of the muslim world. But if it's either they lose power vs merciless bloodletting they will eventually opt for the later
And there is no soft treatment so no point in worrying about human rights.
They know who the problems are. Just let them deal with it.
 
If Muslims were as violent as you portray, we wouldn't stand a chance. Because there are hundreds of millions of them. Even if 10% of them were as violent as you portray, we wouldn't stand a chance.

It might be time to step back and reconsider your bias.

of course we would the rest of the world would gang up against them if they did that. The "moderate muslims" serve a usueful role in the jihad as they are the ones who provide the political cover to prevent the world from fighitng back against isis more fully. Instead of doing all out war against them to get it over with we are encouraged to see them as fellow humans who are just misunderstood.

If you truly loved the PEOPLE who adhere to Islam the most merciful and kind thing to do is to introduce them to another religion.
 
If Muslims were as violent as you portray, we wouldn't stand a chance. Because there are hundreds of millions of them. Even if 10% of them were as violent as you portray, we wouldn't stand a chance.

It might be time to step back and reconsider your bias.

You might want to check your own bias in light of some facts:

"More generally, Muslims mostly say that suicide bombings and other forms of violence against civilians in the name of Islam are rarely or never justified, including 92% in Indonesia and 91% in Iraq. In the United States, a 2011 survey found that 86% of Muslims say that such tactics are rarely or never justified. An additional 7% say suicide bombings are sometimes justified and 1% say they are often justified in these circumstances.

In a few countries, a quarter or more of Muslims say that these acts of violence are at least sometimes justified, including 40% in the Palestinian territories, 39% in Afghanistan, 29% in Egypt and 26% in Bangladesh."

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/
_____________

Those are some unsettling percentages if one is determined to propose that Islam has been hijacked by a microscopic minority. To put it in perspective, say that 'only' 86% of US Christians condemned abortion clinic bombing. In other words, the other 14% [out of 200 million ish?] is a fricking boat load of potential terrorists.

Liberals would be jumping straight-legged and I doubt you could even find an abortion clinic because no one would dare build one.

Part of the problem with radical Islam is that much of the West is simply in denial about it.
 
Back
Top