Thank you...do you get the "its having done a hard journey that matters" idea? That this is why the atheists have so far been useless if Bari Weiss is correct? That they are fundamentally not good enough to fight this war. That they must get better RIGHT NOW.
How do U.S. Right Wingers differ from those in Europe?
- Thread starter Drummie123
- Start date
Thank you...do you get the "its having done a hard journey that matters" idea? That this is why the atheists have so far been useless if Bari Weiss is correct? That they are fundamentally not good enough to fight this war. That they must get better RIGHT NOW.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
I think one could have a good head without hardship, but it's also easier to be a delusional fucktard without hardship.
Its more a matter of being pushed and pulled by life into an expansion of consciousness.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
That was a squabble. People aren't mad enough yet. They are getting there, though.
Once that happens, there's no stopping it.
Catch ya on the other side.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Clinton benefitted from Reagan policies.
Drummie123
Verified User
There should be a law to prevent your snooping around and disclosing info that is not meant to be made public.
Do it again and you will be permanently ignored.
And you don't act Texan at all.
Drummie123
Verified User
Drummie123
Verified User
So "conservative reforms" take 20 years to achieve anything?
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Drummie123
Verified User
A fact check is on the way for this one, too.
You certainly post like a Liberal.
That's how you guys trick the unwary.
You assert something that SOUNDS correct without bothering to post substantiation for your assertions and then count on the readers not to check your assertions.
I will have a remedy ready if I ever find you are taking advantage of the trust you assume we will grant you.
Permanent ignore listing.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
American Right wingers speak English those in Europe speak in foreign tongues? 
Please go back to math class and study the presidential timeline.
Reagan made his reforms at the beginning of his Presidency, in 1981. Clinton achieved a surplus in 2000. That is 19 years, close enough to 20 years to just round it off as 20 years.
The fact is that Clinton raising taxes, we had the strongest growth during my lifetime, and we got rising revenue. All of that is the exact opposite of what Reagan said would happen.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
It was the rise of the internet, you fucktard. Clinton allowed GoDaddy to buy up 50% or so of internet domains, gave our missile technology to China. Set up Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac which caused the 2007 housing crisis.
Signed NAFTA which shipped countless American jobs overseas.
Reagan was president until 1988.
Reagan's heart was in the right place, but he wasn't all that great as president.
Mainly because Bush was really running things.
The US hasn't had good presidents from after Nixon until Trump.
Nixon and Trump were good presidents, JFK too.
LBJ, no. Ford? Eh.
The Bushes are elitist globalist traitors.
Clinton is in their group.
Obama is a different entity. Pure anti-American scum.
Last edited:
Do you know what a domain is? There are no limits on domain names. A lot of people chose to register through them, but they do not own the domain names.
The rise of the internet? You mean that thing that Reagan wanted to cancel, and that Clinton's VP saved?
The first Bush signed NAFTA. So you are claiming that the strongest growth in decades happened after "countless American jobs" left America?
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
WRONG! The first Bush wrote NAFTA, but Clinton signed it in his last days in office. NAFTA didn't take effect until after Clinton was a lame duck.
Ofc I know what a domain is. I've lived this, you fucktard. I'm not relying on websites. This is from memory, boy.
I was hoping he wouldn't sign it, but he did.
That thing Clinton did in Sarajevo was wrong, too. Gave the Muslims an edge there.
Oh! and the "Assault weapons ban". That was Clinton. POS.
Last edited:
Here is one....the Right in Europe tends to think that the United States of Europe project that the elite have been engaged in is a bad idea and should be dismantled...where as in the United States of America it is the Illiberal Left that has decided that America is irredeemable, and must be taken apart...in America it is the right which is saying to stay the course.
You got every last detail there wrong.
NAFTA was signed on December 17th, 1992. Clinton was sworn in a few weeks later on January 20th, 1993. It took effect on January 1st, 1994, after Clinton had only been in office for not even a year. Three years later, Clinton was reelected, so the opposite of a lame duck.
If NAFTA was the disaster you claim, why was the growth so strong after it? Was Clinton just that good in other ways?
Well, from memory, can you pick out Clinton in this picture of the signing ceremony?
Over half the Bosnians are of the Bosnian/Muslim ethnic group. The Serbians attempted to counteract this by using genocide. That was wrong.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
You got every last detail there wrong.
NAFTA was signed on December 17th, 1992. Clinton was sworn in a few weeks later on January 20th, 1993. It took effect on January 1st, 1994, after Clinton had only been in office for not even a year. Three years later, Clinton was reelected, so the opposite of a lame duck.
If NAFTA was the disaster you claim, why was the growth so strong after it? Was Clinton just that good in other ways?
Well, from memory, can you pick out Clinton in this picture of the signing ceremony?
Over half the Bosnians are of the Bosnian/Muslim ethnic group. The Serbians attempted to counteract this by using genocide. That was wrong.
Idiot:
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/08/clinton-signs-nafta-into-law-dec-8-1993-1040789
Care to try me some more?
Idiot:
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/08/clinton-signs-nafta-into-law-dec-8-1993-1040789
Care to try me some more?
OK, find the Mexican or Canadian leader in that picture of Clinton.