Русский агент
Путин - мl
THE DEMOCRAT RESPONSE? 'WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE'?
A convoy of well-armed terrorists rolled into the complex housing the American consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012.
The attackers sealed off streets leading to the consulate with trucks and then commenced the attack on the building using rocket-propelled grenades, AK-47s, mortars, and artillery mounted on trucks.
Ambassador Chris Stevens called Deputy Chief of Mission Gregory Hicks for help, saying “Greg, we’re under attack.”
Hicks, who was in Tripoli, conveyed this up the line, but no help arrived. The terrorists killed Ambassador Stevens and another American and set the building ablaze. Two more Americans would die later attempting to protect the annex.
As soon as the next morning, Congressman Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, described the attack as a “commando-style event” with “coordinated fire, direct fire.”
A few days later the Libyan president said that it was a planned terrorist attack. He also said that the idea that it was a “spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous.”
Yet the well-orchestrated disinformation campaign by the Obama administration would make any KGB colonel sigh with admiration.
At 10:32 on the night of the attack, Secretary Clinton issued a statement deploring violence in response to “inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”
In the days that followed, the president and his spokesman repeatedly invoked the supposedly offensive video as the cause of the attack.
The president and secretary of state even filmed commercials to play in Muslim countries denouncing the video while also upholding America’s tradition of religious and political freedom.
“We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others,” said the president.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/377040/hillarys-unconscionable-benghazi-lie-mona-charen