How and Why the False Climate Consensus is Manufactured

a-png.890231
 
An observation from a Swedish engineer:

“The notion that a nation can run on sunshine and breezes is worse than delusional.

People might fall for the idea that we can merrily run on sunshine and breezes, alone, but with a few trillion dollars worth of mythical mega-batteries providing backup for a few minutes, when the sun sets and the wind stops blowing.

A two-megawatt w!ndmill is made up of 260 tons of steel that required 300 tons or iron ore and 170 tons of coking coal, all mined, transported and produced by hydrocarbons.

A w!ndmill could spin until it falls apart and never generate as much energy as was invested in building it.”

Windmills.jpeg

That's a serious net energy loss.
 
[ing]https://www.1911addicts.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,onerror=redirect,width=1920,height=1920,fit=scale-down/https://www.1911addicts.com/attachments/deice-jpg.955591/ [/img]
 
.
Excellent article by Australian professor Aynsley Kellow

“Aynsley” isn’t even a climate scientist but rather teaches politics in Tanzania

Flat Earthers crack anyone up with the way they run with a paper or opinion piece from some obscure individual and present it as if it is a game changer, all part of a weak obvious attempt to create a false paradigm, guarantee if one could trace back the actual vehicle, cleverly named “Climate Change” so as to avoid a Google check, they’d find it was a Koch funded or Oil industry front
 
Back
Top