Hottest Day on Record Was Day Before Yesterday

^^^
Too fucking stupid to be a graduate of an American law school.

No, there is natural climate change and then there's human-induced climate change. Mankind naturally tries to change his environment with dams, deforestation, removing predators, etc. 8 Billion people have an impact as shown by NASA. Flat Earthers and those who believe the Moon Landing was faked won't believe this:

url]https://climate.nasa.gov/[/url]

url]https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/[/url]
How Do We Know Climate Change Is Real?
There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human activity is the principal cause.
The rate of change since the mid-20th century is unprecedented over millennia.
Earth's climate has changed throughout history. Just in the last 800,000 years, there have been eight cycles of ice ages and warmer periods, with the end of the last ice age about 11,700 years ago marking the beginning of the modern climate era — and of human civilization. Most of these climate changes are attributed to very small variations in Earth’s orbit that change the amount of solar energy our planet receives.

IMG]https://climate.nasa.gov/rails/active_storage/representations/redirect/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBBL21HQWc9PSIsImV4cCI6bnVsbCwicHVyIjoiYmxvYl9pZCJ9fQ==--4812b9bf091c9336103c69f02f5c5b36bf982de5/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaDdCam9MWm05eWJXRjBPZ2wzWldKdyIsImV4cCI6bnVsbCwicHVyIjoidmFyaWF0aW9uIn19--308d105b858fde2aa7c2bd953e87f719e2dd73bb/CO2_graph.jpeg?content_type=image%2Fwebp&disposition=inline[/IMG]

Climate cannot change. It has no values associated with it that can change.
It is not possible to measure the global atmospheric content of CO2.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
CO2 has no capability to warm the Earth. You are still ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
 
The time to fix things was a half-century ago.
We didn't do it then, so we're fucked.

We may as well all live for today,
but I can't imagine anybody wanting to subject future generations
to the environmental holocaust that's now clearly both inevitable and imminent.

I guess that I can't say that there are NO advantages to being old.
I won't have to see the shit show.

Fix what?
 
Disagreed. All we need is a plague that is 90%+ fatal to the unvaxxed. That'll reduce the human population down to about a billion. It'll smell for about a year, but then all will be better. :thup:

BTW, a billion people is about the global population in 1800.

You really are a morbid sort, aren't ya?
 
Here we go again with that bullshit, concocted it never changes!
Abstract and Figures
Ultraspectral resolution infrared (IR) radiances obtained from nadir observations provide information about the atmosphere, surface, aerosols, and clouds. Surface spectral emissivity (SSE) and surface skin temperature from current and future operational satellites can and will reveal critical information about the Earth's ecosystem and land-surface-type properties, which might be utilized as a means of long-term monitoring of the Earth's environment and global climate change. In this study, fast radiative transfer models applied to the atmosphere under all weather conditions are used for atmospheric profile and surface or cloud parameter retrieval from ultraspectral and/or hyperspectral spaceborne IR soundings. An inversion scheme, dealing with cloudy as well as cloud-free radiances observed with ultraspectral IR sounders, has been developed to simultaneously retrieve atmospheric thermodynamic and surface or cloud microphysical parameters. This inversion scheme has been applied to the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI). Rapidly produced SSE is initially evaluated through quality control checks on the retrievals of other impacted surface and atmospheric parameters. Initial validation of retrieved emissivity spectra is conducted with Namib and Kalahari desert laboratory measurements. Seasonal products of global land SSE and surface skin temperature retrieved with IASI are presented to demonstrate seasonal variation of SSE.

url]https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224160723_Global_Land_Surface_Emissivity_Retrieved_From_Satellite_Ultraspectral_IR_Measurements[/url]

Sorry, dude. The emissivity of Earth is unknown. It also is not possible to measure it. You are AGAIN ignoring the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
Science is not an abstract, paper, book, magazine, website, university, college, government or government agency, degree, certification, credential, or any other form of sanctification.
 
1688662276483-png.1323243

Not possible. Climate cannot change. There are no values associated with climate. There is nothing to change.
 
^^^
Too fucking stupid to be a have actually passed the GED tests, as we previously believed.....no one continues to pretend there is human induced climate change......the current claim is that human activity has made climate change worse........to be fair, if you look at the ice core data the current cycle is actually less warm than the last one so its still up to you idiots to prove human activity hasn't made it better.......go ahead.......

Climate cannot change. Climate has no temperature.

Ice cores do not measure temperature. Science does not use proxies.

What 'cycle'?
 
Tropospheric temperature sampling is performed every day using O2 Microwave Sounding Units onboard Aqua satellites.
Not possible. The emissivity of Earth is unknown. It cannot be measured.
The signal received by the MSU in its target frequency is made up of three components: Signals from the atmosphere radiated up to the satellite, signals from the atmosphere radiated down and reflected off the Earth’s surface, and signals emitted by the Earth itself.
Doesn't measure temperature or emissivity.
Two main groups performing regular analysis of the data from the MSU’s and providing temperature analysis are at the University of Alabama, Huntsville (UAH) & at Remote Sensing Systems in California (RSS)
It doesn't matter how many 'groups'. It is simply not possible to measure the temperature nor the emissivity of the Earth or any part of it using a satellite.
The 4 frequencies are designated MSU Channels 1 (50.30 GHz), 2 (53.74 GHz), 3 (54.96 GHz), and 4 (57.95 GHz)
Again...you are ignoring the Sterfan-Boltzmann law. There is no frequency term in the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

Why are you so concerned about the temperature of the Earth?? Do you believe that some magick gas has the capability to warm the Earth?

Assuming a constant output from the Sun, there is no reason for the temperature of the Earth to even change, except as a consequence of it's distance to the Sun (Earth's orbit is very slightly elliptical).
The Earth is currently passing aphelion. If anything, Earth is a bit cooler during summer in the Northern hemisphere and warmer during winter in the Northern hemisphere (when Earth passes through perihelion).
 
Last edited:
Thinks his adopted kid is smart for making shapes for food :laugh:

lol....thinks he's going to attack me by saying I have an adopted son or that I think he's smart......he is.....article in a nation wide publication for the cannabis industry rated the best edibles produced in the country and six of the top ten were his recipies.......he runs a production facility in Florida and when he first went down there his new boss brought him into a zoom meeting with the biggest producers in the country.....they all knew him on a first name basis because they had bought their production systems and recipies from him.....and two months ago a university in NY called him and said they were starting a graduate program in cannabis marketing and production and that he was on their short list of people they wanted to hire.....

so I guess I'm not the only one who thinks my adopted kid is smart for making shapes for food.......
 
Climate cannot change. It has no values associated with it that can change.
It is not possible to measure the global atmospheric content of CO2.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
CO2 has no capability to warm the Earth. You are still ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
SYBIL
You really are a morbid sort, aren't ya?
IS A
You hate them, though you believe in them.
PSYCHO
 
You've cited no mathematics you deranged cunt

Yes I have...multiple times. Go learn statistical, probability, and random number, and algebraic mathematics. I am not going to write a book here.

A summary in statistical math requires two results: the average and the margin of error. You have NEVER shown your work. You have NEVER shown your data. You have NEVER shown how you measured emissivity or global temperature or global atmospheric CO2 concentration. You have NEVER shown and justified your source of variance. You even attempt to use a statistical summary as some kind of crystal ball to see the future. It has NO ability to predict.

Making up numbers and using them as 'data' is a fallacy, dude. Quoting made up numbers and using them as 'data' is the same fallacy, coupled with a false authority fallacy.

Mathematics is not 'derangement'. You simply choose to ignore it.
 
Last edited:
Not possible. The emissivity of Earth is unknown. It cannot be measured.

Doesn't measure temperature or emissivity.

It doesn't matter how many 'groups'. It is simply not possible to measure the temperature nor the emissivity of the Earth or any part of it using a satellite.

Again...you are ignoring the Sterfan-Boltzmann law. There is no frequency term in the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

Why are you so concerned about the temperature of the Earth?? Do you believe that some magick gas has the capability to warm the Earth?

Assuming a constant output from the Sun, there is no reason for the temperature of the Earth to even change, except as a consequence of it's distance to the Sun (Earth's orbit is very slightly elliptical).
The Earth is currently passing aphelion. If anything, Earth is a bit cooler during summer in the Northern hemisphere and warmer during winter in the Northern hemisphere (when Earth passes through perihelion).

I haven't either the inclination or the patience to answer this undiluted codswallop.
 
Back
Top