Hottest Day on Record Was Day Before Yesterday

Nice bounce at the end. Why the sudden bounce upward in temperature, vols?

Why the sudden bounce upward in temperature 250 million years ago


Earth's average surface temperature over the past 500 million years. For most of the time, global temperatures appear to have been too warm (red portions of line) for persistent polar ice caps.

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/whats-hottest-earths-ever-been


You see dip shit temps up and down for 500 million years...most of the time there were no ice caps....was man around at that time????
 
Last edited:
hottest 'recorded' day.

We've only had global temperature monitoring since the 70s, and only really reliable monitoring since maybe the 80s. That's 50 years max of recorded global temps to have an accurate reading. Meanwhile, what we do know is that the 30s were likely the hottest decade in recent history.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. Global temperature monitoring is not possible.
 
It's that time of year again where the climate bullshit is allowed free rein and the usual suspects, in this case the BBC, post it without any analysis.

“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”. – J Robert Oppenheimer.

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2023/07/04/hottest-evah-june/

The Church of Global Warming never really goes away. Like any religion, they have their holidays and Holy Months as well. They just happen to share a lot of them with the Church of Green and the Church of Perversion.
 
CO2 levels are at their highest level in a few hundred thousand years. Started with the Industrial Revolution.

Or were you ignorant of that fact, as well?

Not a fact. A scripture.
It is not possible to measure the global atmospheric concentration of CO2.
 
Logic on the Right: there is "only reliable monitoring since maybe the 80's" but "Meanwhile we do know the 30's were likely the hottest decade in recent history."

No monitoring of global temperature is possible. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. This isn't a 'left' or 'right' thing. This is a mathematics thing.
 
Yep. What about them?

CO2 is 400+ ppm. Highest in a couple hundred thousand years. High CO2 levels have historically been associated with higher global temperatures. And those CO2 levels are due to man’s contributions
It is not possible to measure the global atmospheric concentration of CO2. CO2 is not uniformly distributed in the atmosphere.
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.
Water vapor, presence is dependent on temperature. Almost none in upper atmosphere where methane and CO2 can do their jobs.
The presence of water vapor is not dependent on temperature.
Methane. 20-80x the greenhouse gas CO2 is. Agriculture is the greatest contributor. Despite what some right wing sites tell you, it does not “compete” with CO2 or water vapor to absorb IR. It absorbs at a different wavelength in the IR spectrum.
Absorption of IR emitted from Earth's surface does not warm the Earth.
Now, instead of spouting off and demonstrating your ignorance on the subject, do a little fucking homework.
Do a little fucking homework.

You cannot create energy out of nothing.
You cannot trap heat.
You cannot trap light.
You cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.
You cannot decrease entropy...EVER.
You cannot prevent the conversion of thermal energy into light.
You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas.

You CANNOT DO IT. No matter what your religion believes, you CANNOT DO IT.

Ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law and statistical mathematics is not going to get you anywhere.
 
He’s referring to the Dust Bowl years in the plains of the US. It was isolated to that area and in Canada. NOT a world wide phenomenon.

The Dust Bowl was an anomaly of several factors including crop mismanagement and drought that created a furnace like situation in the Midwest. Not to be confused with the worldwide stuff we’re seeing now.

So, another post out of ignorance.

There is no 'worldwide stuff' you're seeing now. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, nor the global atmospheric concentration of CO2, nor the frequency or intensity of all the storms on the Earth, nor the global sea level, not the pH of the oceans.

He's referring to random numbers, just like you.
 
This explains what's really going on. An extremely low NAO index, weak trade winds and an El Nino potentially as powerful as 1998. Of course the assorted climate cuntwhistles prefer just to blame it all on CO2.

Negative NAO anomalies correspond to negative subtropical sea level pressure anomalies and weak trade winds to the south. Weak trades warm the underlying sea surface primarily by hindering evaporative cooling, but affect tropical SSTs through several complementary mechanisms, simultaneously favoring warming through reductions in stratocumulus cloudiness, Saharan dust advection, upper-ocean mixing and coastal upwelling off NW Africa. Overall, the turbulent flux associated with weak winds has dominated over the shortwave flux in warming the Atlantic.

https://judithcurry.com/2023/07/02/...-temperatures-in-the-north-atlantic/#comments

The NAO does not change the temperature of the Earth nor is caused by any change of temperature of the Earth.
This 'cycle' is nothing more than trade currents pinching off the flow of the equatorial counter current (or not). It's purely random. Since it takes a while for current positions to wander, it tends to last several months and generally occurs during the winter of the northern hemisphere (or the summer of the southern hemisphere), usually shifting as the Sun passes overhead on the way south.

The NAO is due to uneven heating of the Earth and naturally variable weather during equinox. Nothing more.

This equatorial current shift warmer water to either the eastern Pacific, or the western Pacific, leaving the other side exposed to colder water welling up from below.
El Nino is called the 'Christ Child', because warmer water is on the west Pacific, leaving colder (and nutrient) rich water welling up from below, improving fishing. Fish go where there is food. This effect is felt in winter in the northern hemisphere, which is typically around Christmas.

BTW, the Atlantic ocean has one too. It can easily affect weather in Europe.
Indeed, the Titanic sinking, although it was due to several factors including egregious errors by the captain and crew and the lack of standard procedures, was also due to the factor of icebergs moving further south than usual that year. This was probably due to a stronger than usual equatorial counter current at the time.
 
Last edited:
Such an arsehole

Spring and summer of 1934 brought by far the hottest weather, the most severe drought and the worst
dust storms the country east of the Rocky Mountains has ever experienced in its climatological history.
Climate has no 'history'. Climate has no temperature or rain fall measurement. You are discussing weather, not climate.
By late August, 24 states with a population of more than 27 millions had been seriously affected. Never before had there been so little rain over so wide a territory throughout
the growing season. Like the depression, the drought made itself felt as an international disaster. The list of
countries in the line-up reads almost
like a roster of the world's best
farm lands.
Meanwhile, Seattle experienced a fairly normal summer. Anchorage ran slightly cooler than normal that year.
Extent of drought zone.—Roughly
speaking, the drought zone extends from the interior of Russia across Germany and the Danube Basin,
across France, the North Atlantic Ocean, the United States, and Canada. Within this vast zone there
were damp spots, but as a whole it was deficient in moisture. In a measure, Argentina and Australia have
somewhat the same story to tell.
Unusually high spring and summer temperatures. — "The excess above normal temperature in many
places was nearly twice as great as that for the previous warmest summer of record.
New high temperatures were recorded early, and the
number of days with 100° F or over was exceptional at a large number of his article is based on observations of
the writer on several journeys through the
drought area during the past five vears, the
most recent being in October, 1934, and on
material received from several sources by the
EDITOR of the BULLETIN.
One has to remember several things:

No temperature at any weather station is a global temperature.
No rain gauge at any weather station is a global rainfall.
No wind vane or speedometer at any weather stations is a global wind.

Sure, many places experienced hot dry weather in the summer of 1934. The Dust Bowl was more the result of poor farming practices than the weather.
 
Amendment noted, with an emphasis on drought rather than heat other than "unusually high spring and summer temperatures in many places". There is no suggestion the period was the global warmest ever recorded, nor is it regarded as such by the science community at large.

Science isn't a community.
Science isn't data.
 
WTF is a 'globally localized' heat wave??????????!?
Buzzword fallacy.
I had stopped making additions to my Lispy Leftist list for quite a while now (as I was busy with other things), but I couldn't let this big of a doozy slide by... so the list has been resurrected... it's now up to 500 entries with this latest one...
 
The NAO does not change the temperature of the Earth nor is caused by any change of temperature of the Earth.
This 'cycle' is nothing more than trade currents pinching off the flow of the equatorial counter current (or not). It's purely random. Since it takes a while for current positions to wander, it tends to last several months and generally occurs during the winter of the northern hemisphere (or the summer of the southern hemisphere), usually shifting as the Sun passes overhead on the way south.

The NAO is due to uneven heating of the Earth and naturally variable weather during equinox. Nothing more.

This equatorial current shift warmer water to either the eastern Pacific, or the western Pacific, leaving the other side exposed to colder water welling up from below.
El Nino is called the 'Christ Child', because warmer water is on the west Pacific, leaving colder (and nutrient) rich water welling up from below, improving fishing. Fish go where there is food. This effect is felt in winter in the northern hemisphere, which is typically around Christmas.

BTW, the Atlantic ocean has one too. It can easily affect weather in Europe.
Indeed, the Titanic sinking, although it was due to several factors including egregious errors by the captain and crew and the lack of standard procedures, was also due to the factor of icebergs moving further south than usual that year. This was probably due to a stronger than usual equatorial counter current at the time.

Always predictable, any climate change thread will bring “pidgin” with his pseudo science he can’t copy fast enough off of his Flat Earth websites, like watching a Norm Crosby or Professor Corey standup

Earlier tells us temperature cannot be measured and now NAO doesn’t change the temperature he can’t measure, ah, duh

And he is wrong, not why the NAO is significant:

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9152
https://www.britannica.com/science/North-Atlantic-Oscillation
https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/research_...ng-and-atlantic-tropical-cyclone-variability/
http://www.climate.gov/news-feature...limate-variability-north-atlantic-oscillation
https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/pi/NAO/intro/whatisthenao.html
 
I had stopped making additions to my Lispy Leftist list for quite a while now (as I was busy with other things), but I couldn't let this big of a doozy slide by... so the list has been resurrected... it's now up to 500 entries with this latest one...

They just keep coming up with new ones, don't they?

Same old scripture, new buzzwords.
 
Always predictable, any climate change thread will bring “pidgin” with his pseudo science he can’t copy fast enough off of his Flat Earth websites, like watching a Norm Crosby or Professor Corey standup

Earlier tells us temperature cannot be measured and now NAO doesn’t change the temperature he can’t measure, ah, duh

And he is wrong, not why the NAO is significant:

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9152
https://www.britannica.com/science/North-Atlantic-Oscillation
https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/research_...ng-and-atlantic-tropical-cyclone-variability/
http://www.climate.gov/news-feature...limate-variability-north-atlantic-oscillation
https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/pi/NAO/intro/whatisthenao.html

Boy, you took us back in comedy time with those references.
 
Back
Top