Horse medicine in the news

Darth Omar

Russian asset
Moreover, recoveries continue to outnumber new cases in the state. Out of the 1,91,446 samples tested in the last 24 hours, 33 samples tested positive for the Covid-19 infection and as a result the Test Positivity Rate (TPR) slumped to lower than 0.01 per cent in Uttar Pradesh, the state government data showed.

In the same period, 25 patients recovered from the infection. The active caseload in the country's most populous state has been reduced to 187 from a high of 3,10,783 in April, pushing the recovery rate up to 98.7 per cent, the state government said in a release.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hi...mp-praises-yogi-govt-101631606229422-amp.html
________

Enviable Covid stats for a heavily populated province in India. Or, anywhere.

What do they do? Three of the usual things that hardly ever work and everyone does and one thing that hardly anyone else does. Aggressive contact tracing, testing, vaccinations and….wait for it..home treatment kits with Ivermectin. Also, prophylactic Ivermectin on exposure and/or for healthcare workers.

This is a bang your head against the wall moment for us logic addicts. Why aren’t we doing this here? Ivermectin is a *cheap*, well known drug with a long established risk profile. And the risks are low. Since we are already living a mass vax experiment using novel biotechnology, why not go all the way with it?

Why not have a cohort use prophylactic Ivermectin while the other gets the vax? There seems to be no shortage of volunteers for the first group. Right? Something is working in India and the one thing they are doing that we aren’t is prophylaxis and early treatment with Ivermectin.

Staying home until you are sick enough to be admitted to the hospital doesn’t seem to be cutting it. Besides, it’s barbaric.
 
Moreover, recoveries continue to outnumber new cases in the state. Out of the 1,91,446 samples tested in the last 24 hours, 33 samples tested positive for the Covid-19 infection and as a result the Test Positivity Rate (TPR) slumped to lower than 0.01 per cent in Uttar Pradesh, the state government data showed.

In the same period, 25 patients recovered from the infection. The active caseload in the country's most populous state has been reduced to 187 from a high of 3,10,783 in April, pushing the recovery rate up to 98.7 per cent, the state government said in a release.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hi...mp-praises-yogi-govt-101631606229422-amp.html
________

Enviable Covid stats for a heavily populated province in India. Or, anywhere.

What do they do? Three of the usual things that hardly ever work and everyone does and one thing that hardly anyone else does. Aggressive contact tracing, testing, vaccinations and….wait for it..home treatment kits with Ivermectin. Also, prophylactic Ivermectin on exposure and/or for healthcare workers.

This is a bang your head against the wall moment for us logic addicts. Why aren’t we doing this here? Ivermectin is a *cheap*, well known drug with a long established risk profile. And the risks are low. Since we are already living a mass vax experiment using novel biotechnology, why not go all the way with it?

Why not have a cohort use prophylactic Ivermectin while the other gets the vax? There seems to be no shortage of volunteers for the first group. Right? Something is working in India and the one thing they are doing that we aren’t is prophylaxis and early treatment with Ivermectin.

Staying home until you are sick enough to be admitted to the hospital doesn’t seem to be cutting it. Besides, it’s barbaric.

Well those Indians sure need to be dewormed anyway. Those places are filthy.
 
Moreover, recoveries continue to outnumber new cases in the state. Out of the 1,91,446 samples tested in the last 24 hours, 33 samples tested positive for the Covid-19 infection and as a result the Test Positivity Rate (TPR) slumped to lower than 0.01 per cent in Uttar Pradesh, the state government data showed.

In the same period, 25 patients recovered from the infection. The active caseload in the country's most populous state has been reduced to 187 from a high of 3,10,783 in April, pushing the recovery rate up to 98.7 per cent, the state government said in a release.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hi...mp-praises-yogi-govt-101631606229422-amp.html
________

Enviable Covid stats for a heavily populated province in India. Or, anywhere.

What do they do? Three of the usual things that hardly ever work and everyone does and one thing that hardly anyone else does. Aggressive contact tracing, testing, vaccinations and….wait for it..home treatment kits with Ivermectin. Also, prophylactic Ivermectin on exposure and/or for healthcare workers.

This is a bang your head against the wall moment for us logic addicts. Why aren’t we doing this here? Ivermectin is a *cheap*, well known drug with a long established risk profile. And the risks are low. Since we are already living a mass vax experiment using novel biotechnology, why not go all the way with it?

Why not have a cohort use prophylactic Ivermectin while the other gets the vax? There seems to be no shortage of volunteers for the first group. Right? Something is working in India and the one thing they are doing that we aren’t is prophylaxis and early treatment with Ivermectin.

Staying home until you are sick enough to be admitted to the hospital doesn’t seem to be cutting it. Besides, it’s barbaric.

Thanks for locating that :good4u:
 
When the full truth comes out about everything, and it will,...my guess is leftwingers will be filled with rage. And for good reason. ;)
 
When the full truth comes out about everything, and it will,...my guess is leftwingers will be filled with rage. And for good reason. ;)

Nah. You Trump supporters need to be dewormed anyway. Lord only knows what you guys have. ;)
 
Moreover, recoveries continue to outnumber new cases in the state. Out of the 1,91,446 samples tested in the last 24 hours, 33 samples tested positive for the Covid-19 infection and as a result the Test Positivity Rate (TPR) slumped to lower than 0.01 per cent in Uttar Pradesh, the state government data showed.

In the same period, 25 patients recovered from the infection. The active caseload in the country's most populous state has been reduced to 187 from a high of 3,10,783 in April, pushing the recovery rate up to 98.7 per cent, the state government said in a release.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hi...mp-praises-yogi-govt-101631606229422-amp.html
________

Enviable Covid stats for a heavily populated province in India. Or, anywhere.

What do they do? Three of the usual things that hardly ever work and everyone does and one thing that hardly anyone else does. Aggressive contact tracing, testing, vaccinations and….wait for it..home treatment kits with Ivermectin. Also, prophylactic Ivermectin on exposure and/or for healthcare workers.

This is a bang your head against the wall moment for us logic addicts. Why aren’t we doing this here? Ivermectin is a *cheap*, well known drug with a long established risk profile. And the risks are low. Since we are already living a mass vax experiment using novel biotechnology, why not go all the way with it?

Why not have a cohort use prophylactic Ivermectin while the other gets the vax? There seems to be no shortage of volunteers for the first group. Right? Something is working in India and the one thing they are doing that we aren’t is prophylaxis and early treatment with Ivermectin.

Staying home until you are sick enough to be admitted to the hospital doesn’t seem to be cutting it. Besides, it’s barbaric.

And, in the meantime everybody can pick Quercetin (another zinc ionophore) to get the most out of their zinc supp, strengthen up their immune system.
Cost you about $2.50/month. :awesome:
 
When the full truth comes out about everything, and it will,...my guess is leftwingers will be filled with rage. And for good reason. ;)

I’m actually open to the idea the horse medicine doesn’t work.

But I’ve also become very skeptical/suspicious of Fauci, the medical bureaucracy and Big Pharma. Yes, I believe they are capable of tanking an effective treatment and I wish I didn’t believe that.

So, let’s find out. Ivermectin is about as ‘dangerous’ as a course of antibiotics. Test it on a mass scale—like we are with mRNA vaccines.
 
I'm fully willing to admit that ivermectin might have some use in fighting Covid, that still doesn't mean I'm going to my local co-op to pick up a tube. That's where the stupidity lies and the ridicule is warranted.
 
Got some tests right here!:good4u:


Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 64 studies
Covid Analysis, Sep 18, 2021

•Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 68% [52‑78%] and 86% [75‑92%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and restriction to peer-reviewed studies or Randomized Controlled Trials.
•Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. 29 studies show statistically significant improvements in isolation.
•Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 53 of 64 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.

Studies - Prophylaxis - Early treatment - Late treatment - Patients - Authors

All studies 64 86% [75‑92%] 68% [52‑78%] 40% [24‑52%] 26,509 641
Peer-reviewed 45 86% [74‑93%] 70% [52‑81%] 43% [21‑59%] 17,316 490
Randomized Controlled Trials 32 84% [25‑96%] 63% [45‑75%] 30% [2‑50%] 6,648 387
Percentage improvement with ivermectin treatment

•While many treatments have some level of efficacy, they do not replace vaccines and other measures to avoid infection. Only 27% of ivermectin studies show zero events in the treatment arm.
•Elimination of COVID-19 is a race against viral evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Those denying the efficacy of treatments share responsibility for the increased risk of COVID-19 becoming endemic; and the increased mortality, morbidity, and collateral damage.
•There is evidence of a negative publication bias, and the probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 64 studies is estimated to be 1 in 222 billion.
•The evidence base is much larger and has much lower conflict of interest than typically used to approve drugs.
•All data to reproduce this paper and sources are in the appendix. See [Bryant, Hariyanto, Kory, Lawrie, Nardelli] for other meta analyses with similar results confirming efficacy.

More at https://ivmmeta.com/
 
Last edited:
While many treatments have some level of efficacy, they do not replace vaccines and other measures to avoid infection. Only 27% of ivermectin studies show zero events in the treatment arm.
 
Back
Top