Honest question for the board........

:ROFLMAO:. tic tic tic tic.......
^^^
Minion of Satan still can't cite a single Bible quote. Sad.

No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.

agnhez.jpg
 
Heres one Dutch that seems to apply to YOU...

The primary Bible passages showing Satan quoting scripture are found in the temptation of Jesus in the wilderness, specifically Matthew 4:6 and Luke 4:9-11. In these verses, Satan quotes Psalm 91:11-12 to tempt Jesus to throw himself from the temple, demonstrating the use of Scripture to mislead or tempt.
  • Matthew 4:6 (NIV): "If you are the Son of God," he said, "throw yourself down. For it is written: 'He will command his angels concerning you, and they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone'".
  • Context: Satan often twists or takes Scripture out of context to distort the truth, even while quoting it accurately.
  • Jesus' Response: Jesus countered this misuse of Scripture with, "It is also written: 'Do not put the Lord your God to the test'" (Matthew 4:7).
Wow. Only five requests to get Stone to do a cut'n'paste. Not bad for a mammon worshiper like Stone.

Can you explain what it means in your own words?

Matthew 7:3-5
3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?
4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye?
5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
 
^^^
Minion of Satan still can't cite a single Bible quote. Sad.

No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.

agnhez.jpg
it is Mammon heathen,...Mammon,...NOT money. Wealth is part of Mammon but mammon encompasses MUCH more. you have so little understanding. Hopefully some day you do.
 
Wow. Only five requests to get Stone to do a cut'n'paste. Not bad for a mammon worshiper like Stone.

Can you explain what it means in your own words?

Matthew 7:3-5
3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?
4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye?
5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
As he sits here launching accusation after accusation after accusation at me. None so blind,........and for Dutch to quote that is about the best proof I can think of.
 
it is Mammon heathen,...Mammon,...NOT money. Wealth is part of Mammon but mammon encompasses MUCH more. you have so little understanding. Hopefully some day you do.
mammon, biblical term for riches, often used to describe the debasing influence of material wealth. The term was used by Jesus in his famous Sermon on the Mount and also appears in The Gospel According to Luke. Medieval writers commonly interpreted it as an evil demon or god. Since the 16th century, mammon has been used to negatively describe the pursuit of wealth and has been used in both religious and secular contexts.
 
As he sits here launching accusation after accusation after accusation at me. None so blind,........and for Dutch to quote that is about the best proof I can think of.
^^^
Still avoids Scripture to support his accusations.
 
Has ANYONE here tonight seen Dutch even making the slightest of movements to remove the timber from his own eye? Or has he been continually reaching for the speck in someone elses?. I think Ive more then proven my point now by letting Dutch prove it FOR ME. I'm done here. Good night.......
 
Lastly..........Evil tends to forget it is evil. When it does it often makes terrible mistakes. Like accusing others of evil while it itself is quoting the Bible out of context while also having a sig line RIGHT BENEATH its OWN POSTS that LITERALLY encourages one man to engage in immoral sexual acts with another man. Evil CANT HELP but to show itself. :unsure:

[IMG alt="Dutch Uncle"]https://www.justplainpolitics.com/data/avatars/m/8/8069.jpg?1767407068[/IMG]

Dutch Uncle

* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution​

Contributor

Weird. Can't even cite the Bible quote. Is it because it burns if he does so?

John 8:7
So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

God bless America and those who defend our Constitution
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
JPP's #1 Snitch Bitch is whining again. :ROFLMAO: :rofl2: :ROFLMAO:
Eat a dick, Legina.
 
Lastly..........Evil tends to forget it is evil. When it does it often makes terrible mistakes. Like accusing others of evil while it itself is quoting the Bible out of context while also having a sig line RIGHT BENEATH its OWN POSTS that LITERALLY encourages one man to engage in immoral sexual acts with another man. Evil CANT HELP but to show itself. :unsure:

[IMG alt="Dutch Uncle"]https://www.justplainpolitics.com/data/avatars/m/8/8069.jpg?1767407068[/IMG]

Dutch Uncle

* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution​

Contributor


Weird. Can't even cite the Bible quote. Is it because it burns if he does so?

John 8:7
So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

God bless America and those who defend our Constitution
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
^^^
Can only quote Biblical quotes from other posters, not for himself. Weird.
 
The answer to the question I first posed to start this thread is found in the early books of the Bible,...like Genesis. However bad anyone thinks it is,...and yeah,...its BAD,...it is so much worse. We are not dealing with simple sexually immoral politicians and world leaders,....we are dealing with something so so much worse. This has nothing to do with politics. it has to do with bloodlines. So,...in those early books like Genesis it talks about bloodlines a lot. starting with Adam and Eve and they're offspring. but...there is ANOTHER bloodline as well..................its all right there. READ it.
White Nationalist ideology.

1770518601834.png
 
^^^^^

Must have never read the actual bible because it has ZERO to do with white or any other race. Or more likely just out to cause confusion and chaos as Satan himself loves to do. Note........in my earlier post I used the word BLOODLINES....NOT races. :unsure:
^^^
flunked HS Biology 101 and Sunday School.

Piper acknowledges that the term race is ambiguous and not very helpful. It has often been used in a negative way to demean other humans. This become especially true since the Darwinian revolution in the 1800s which was brought about by Darwin’s book titled, “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.” Darwin was convinced that white races, especially Europeans, —were evolutionarily more advanced than the black races, thus establishing a racial hierarchy which only confirmed the ‘racist’ attitudes of his day. But, there seems to be a consensus today in biblical, scientific and cultural perspectives that race is a social construct and not based on biological reality....

...While these definitions may not be perfect, they do give us a framework to begin discussing racism. For the term racism, Piper uses a definition developed by the Presbyterian Church in America which says, “Racism is an explicit or implicit belief or practice that qualitatively distinguishes or values one race over other races.” By using this definition of racism, Piper wants to focus in on the heart and behavior of a racist person. A sinful heart that believes that one race is more valuable than another, and sinful behavior that acts in a way that values one race over another. While bringing attention to the personal dimension of racism, he does leave room for racism to also have a structural dimension that might be exhibited laws, policies that exclude based on race. More on that in the coming chapters.
 
^^^
flunked HS Biology 101 and Sunday School.

Piper acknowledges that the term race is ambiguous and not very helpful. It has often been used in a negative way to demean other humans. This become especially true since the Darwinian revolution in the 1800s which was brought about by Darwin’s book titled, “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.” Darwin was convinced that white races, especially Europeans, —were evolutionarily more advanced than the black races, thus establishing a racial hierarchy which only confirmed the ‘racist’ attitudes of his day. But, there seems to be a consensus today in biblical, scientific and cultural perspectives that race is a social construct and not based on biological reality....

...While these definitions may not be perfect, they do give us a framework to begin discussing racism. For the term racism, Piper uses a definition developed by the Presbyterian Church in America which says, “Racism is an explicit or implicit belief or practice that qualitatively distinguishes or values one race over other races.” By using this definition of racism, Piper wants to focus in on the heart and behavior of a racist person. A sinful heart that believes that one race is more valuable than another, and sinful behavior that acts in a way that values one race over another. While bringing attention to the personal dimension of racism, he does leave room for racism to also have a structural dimension that might be exhibited laws, policies that exclude based on race. More on that in the coming chapters.
Human intelligence is no match for Gods wisdom. The Bible is clear on this. Again,....thank you for proving Gods points FOR him. Evil is as evil does.
 
^^^
flunked HS Biology 101 and Sunday School.

Piper acknowledges that the term race is ambiguous and not very helpful. It has often been used in a negative way to demean other humans. This become especially true since the Darwinian revolution in the 1800s which was brought about by Darwin’s book titled, “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.” Darwin was convinced that white races, especially Europeans, —were evolutionarily more advanced than the black races, thus establishing a racial hierarchy which only confirmed the ‘racist’ attitudes of his day. But, there seems to be a consensus today in biblical, scientific and cultural perspectives that race is a social construct and not based on biological reality....

...While these definitions may not be perfect, they do give us a framework to begin discussing racism. For the term racism, Piper uses a definition developed by the Presbyterian Church in America which says, “Racism is an explicit or implicit belief or practice that qualitatively distinguishes or values one race over other races.” By using this definition of racism, Piper wants to focus in on the heart and behavior of a racist person. A sinful heart that believes that one race is more valuable than another, and sinful behavior that acts in a way that values one race over another. While bringing attention to the personal dimension of racism, he does leave room for racism to also have a structural dimension that might be exhibited laws, policies that exclude based on race. More on that in the coming chapters.
I must say,...you are REALLY doing Gods work this evening. unknowingly,...but still. a CHILD could see what has gone on here.
 
^^^
flunked HS Biology 101 and Sunday School.

Piper acknowledges that the term race is ambiguous and not very helpful. It has often been used in a negative way to demean other humans. This become especially true since the Darwinian revolution in the 1800s which was brought about by Darwin’s book titled, “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.” Darwin was convinced that white races, especially Europeans, —were evolutionarily more advanced than the black races, thus establishing a racial hierarchy which only confirmed the ‘racist’ attitudes of his day. But, there seems to be a consensus today in biblical, scientific and cultural perspectives that race is a social construct and not based on biological reality....

...While these definitions may not be perfect, they do give us a framework to begin discussing racism. For the term racism, Piper uses a definition developed by the Presbyterian Church in America which says, “Racism is an explicit or implicit belief or practice that qualitatively distinguishes or values one race over other races.” By using this definition of racism, Piper wants to focus in on the heart and behavior of a racist person. A sinful heart that believes that one race is more valuable than another, and sinful behavior that acts in a way that values one race over another. While bringing attention to the personal dimension of racism, he does leave room for racism to also have a structural dimension that might be exhibited laws, policies that exclude based on race. More on that in the coming chapters.
BTW........this REALLY proves you have no idea OR are again attempting to muddy the waters. . The bloodlines I am talking about actually have very little to do with human beings regardless of their race.
 
Doesn't change what I said. Releasing it all won't "Get Trump" any more than it'll "get" someone filthy rich and or politically connected. Sure, you may score brownie points from it, but those are meaningless. It's an exercise in futility.

Look at Scam Bankfraud-Man (Samuel Bankman-Fried). The guy swindled people out of over 16 billion dollars in a bitcoin-like operation. He gave over $40 million to politicians and political causes, mostly Democrats and Leftists. Regardless, not a penny of that was recovered. No politician or PAC was willing to give back the fraud money they got from Bankfraud-Man. That scandal just went away even as Bankman-Fried went to prison.

No difference here. The Epstein files will go nowhere. Only the innocent or victims--who aren't filthy rich or powerful--stand to be hurt by the release.
Fried gave to both parties equally. Why do you have to be such a fucking liar all the time?
 
True women are more loving and nurturing, while men are more aggressive, selfish and abusive. It's men who can use those traits for good who are the ones to respect. The ones who use those powers for evil are, by definition, evil.

Example:
I have known women I wouldn’t let within ten feet of my child


I have known men that if I was dying I knew I could hand them my child and it would have a wonderful life


It’s about the individual

Those are just numbers

Most men are mostly good

Some are like saints

And a few are complete rat bastards

The same for women

Just a few less rat bastards
 
I must say,...you are REALLY doing Gods work this evening. unknowingly,...but still. a CHILD could see what has gone on here.
Matthew 7:1-3
1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.

2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

BTW........this REALLY proves you have no idea OR are again attempting to muddy the waters. . The bloodlines I am talking about actually have very little to do with human beings regardless of their race.
QED
 
Fried gave to both parties equally. Why do you have to be such a fucking liar all the time?
Bankman-Fried contributed more than $70 million to election campaigns in less than 18 months, placing him among the nation’s top political donors. He personally gave at least $40 million to politicians and political action committees ahead of the 2022 midterm elections, mostly to Democrats and liberal-leaning groups, making him the second overall top donor to Democrats, only behind George Soros, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Public records of Bankman-Fried's money show it primarily went to support Democratic committees and candidates. He donated $6 million to the House Majority PAC, the main outside group supporting House Democrats. He also gave $250,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and $66,500 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

The bulk of his political donations — $27 million — bankrolled the "Protect Our Future PAC," a group advocating for pandemic preparedness.


The "Protect Our Future PAC" spent $24.2 million on independent expenditures (mailers, ads) to support 19 Democratic House candidates including Rep. Lucy McBath of Georgia and recently elected Reps. Maxwell Frost, of Florida, and Jasmine Crockett, of Texas. Carrick Flynn, who unsuccessfully ran for Congress in the Oregon Democratic primary, saw $10 million in outside spending from the "Protect Our Future PAC."


The only evidence that Scam Bankfraud-Man gave to Republicans is his word. There is no paper trail.

 
Back
Top