Hmmm.

Agreed. Being an advocate for peace, it's sad for me when people who advocate violence see violence brought upon them. Charlie advocated violence, hatred and bigotry. He was anti-American. Is it really a surprise Trump's fearmongering tactics finally worked?...even if not in his preferred direction? Sad. Truly. We can do better.
Sez the man who thinks shooting Trump supporters should be a national pastime.
 
No, it's not. But when you make a living promoting division, hatred, distrust and fear, you shoujld expect to get blow back. It's possible to have political discussion w/o promoting violence and hate. Of course, that doesn't sell very well, does it?
Agreed on blowback. Newton's Third Law applied to sociology, past and present.

Societies which are divisive always fail. Although the great invader of the South is famous for repeating it, the fact remains Jesus said it first....at least in the West. :)

Mark 3:25​

25 If a house is divided against itself, that house cannot stand.
 
I have fired that rifle before, left a terrible bruise on my shoulder, and I was not so accurate.
I have a Mosin Negant Rifle its Russian they made them since 1891 I have seen them still being used in the Afghanistan. It's bullets are similar to the Mauser. If you don't hold the stock snuggle to your shoulder it will bruise your shoulder. It kills the hell out of feral pigs. I'm sure it would do the same to humans.
 
And being fat and happy I'd be unable to run fast.
Bad knee here. Now I'm a committed "stand my ground" guy. LOL

One of the few good things Abbott passed was making attacking anyone over 65, regardless of the attacker's age, a hate crime. Automatic 5 years. A good reason to shout out "I'm over 65! I'm over 65" (or actual age) if a MAGAt attacks you.

Put those lousy, lying pieces of shit behind bars where they belong. I support shooting an attacker when in fear of one's life. If that is the decision, no half-assed shit. Shoot to kill. The honorable rules of guns should be followed:
1. Never pull a gun unless you plan to use it.
2. If you use it, shoot to kill.
3. Center of mass. Double tap.
 
No, it's not. But when you make a living promoting division, hatred, distrust and fear, you shoujld expect to get blow back. It's possible to have political discussion w/o promoting violence and hate. Of course, that doesn't sell very well, does it?
If you weren't so blinded by your far left ideology I'd suggest you watch a Bill Maher podcast where he had Kirk on.
But hey, now that even Maher is calling out the left for their extremism which caused independent voters to have no other choice but to vote for Trump, I'm sure you consider him a MAGA too.
 
No, it's not. But when you make a living promoting division, hatred, distrust and fear, you shoujld expect to get blow back. It's possible to have political discussion w/o promoting violence and hate. Of course, that doesn't sell very well, does it?
This is pretty much the same thing that guy that just got fired form MSDNC said. Blaming the victim in an act of violence is shameful. This is the same kind of crap as "she shouldn't have worn that short skirt in THAT part of town" nonsense. No. Folks should not resort to violence because of something that was said. He spent time being respectful, listening to what they said, and making sure they had time and the audience let them speak. He clearly stated that if we want to end the violence and divisiveness the best way to do it is for those who disagree to have a dialogue rather than a fight.

I get that you do not like his opinions, but assuming he preached hate and violence simply because you didn't like his opinion just shows you didn't know what he was about.
 
No, it's not. But when you make a living promoting division, hatred, distrust and fear, you shoujld expect to get blow back.
Blow back via a gun barrel ...thats what you support???

This POS leftist couldn't win a debate with Kirk so he picked up a gun and shot him
 
Last edited:
Back
Top