Hillary's lead holds!

I'm surprised. The battleground polls in particular look very good for Clinton today.

I haven't seen one PA poll w/ Trump in the lead. Can't see how he pulls that one off.

He's probably getting AZ & NV, but those aren't huge surprises. OH looks good for him.

He won't get VA, WI, or MI. The polls that came out today give Hillary a lead in NC. FL is super-tight, but man, does Trump need that one.
 
T1 #122

T1,
Please pardon me. I know it's ad hom. I know it violates netiquette. But do you have a Master's Degree, and if so, in what?

Again, please pardon.
 
Jarod said:
She is still ahead!
Click to expand...

yes, by 1.7, down from 5.5....is she holding on strong or holding on for dear life?.....

Or are you still believeing the polls are rigged?
Click to expand...
I'm believing when ABC got caught rigging the polls they had to make sure that her +12 lead came down to something more realistic...I will leave it up to you to speculate why that was her being down by 1.......
 
anatta said:
well something clearly needs to be done. I was listening and Pence was saying go back to HC without the mandates
and the forced coverage ( pregnancy/psychiatic etc.) whereby you could buy what you need want.

But you'd also have to make it impossible to limit payouts for high cost s diseases, and
deny on previous conditions..

Something has to be done..maybe add a PO across the board,
Click to expand...
Well...cost sharing has always been an important aspect of all insurances. So that's a tricky one.

As for the other issues you list as a positive aspect...they would not exist without ACA.

So no...Trump cannot do away with ACA, and simply open state lines in an idiotic hope that it would magically lower premiums.

PO is the logical next step. Cuts to funding for risk corridors, and the SC ruling that the House must approve cost sharing measures have essentially guaranteed higher premiums.

Odd how Republicans created an atmosphere that demands higher costs, and they run a campaign on same?

Good thing the electorate is stupid.
 
She held, the polls were actually a little off in Rump's favor.

The electoral college shook out differently... say what you want, I was correct about the popular vote.

HRC's poll numbers held even better than the polls showed.
 
Jarod said:
She held, the polls were actually a little off in Rump's favor.

The electoral college shook out differently... say what you want, I was correct about the popular vote.

HRC's poll numbers held even better than the polls showed.
Click to expand...

You were wrong, she didn't hold a 6 point advantage. And she lost the election btw.
 
Jarod said:
She held, the polls were actually a little off in Rump's favor.

The electoral college shook out differently... say what you want, I was correct about the popular vote.

HRC's poll numbers held even better than the polls showed.
Click to expand...

Rewriting history counselor. You want to grave dig your electoral college thread?

You had Hillary over 300
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top