Hillary will use nukes to defend Saudi, UAE, Kuwait???

Status
Not open for further replies.
I would use nukes to defend our allies, if it came to that. It is very unlikely that it would be necessary. Fast and devastating offensive attacks from subs and Aircraft Carriers would likely be more than enough.
 
Damocles said:
I would use nukes to defend our allies, if it came to that. It is very unlikely that it would be necessary. Fast and devastating offensive attacks from subs and Aircraft Carriers would likely be more than enough.
Click to expand...

In the event of something like that happening, instead of all of that muscle flexing with Aircraft Carriers, Battle Groups, and threats of violence and war, why not send a delegation with representatives from CodePINK, Cindy Sheehan, the Berkeley City Council, Global Exchange, Gold Star Families for Peace, The World Can't Wait, Troops Home Fast, and Troops Out Now and let them negotiate a peaceful resolution.
 
Hell yeah....!

PorterM said:
In the event of something like that happening, instead of all of that muscle flexing with Aircraft Carriers, Battle Groups, and threats of violence and war, why not send a delegation with representatives from CodePINK, Cindy Sheehan, the Berkeley City Council, Global Exchange, Gold Star Families for Peace, The World Can't Wait, Troops Home Fast, and Troops Out Now and let them negotiate a peaceful resolution.
Click to expand...


I would even chip in for a First Class one way ticket for darla,us cit,Bac and a couple of others in here!:D
 
Battleborne said:
I would even chip in for a First Class one way ticket for darla,us cit,Bac and a couple of others in here!:D
Click to expand...

First Class tickets... Don't you think that is a bit "elitist"? Coach should be adequate. You don't see them as "Limousine Liberals", do you?
 
I do .................

PorterM said:
First Class tickets... Don't you think that is a bit "elitist"? Coach should be adequate. You don't see them as "Limousine Liberals", do you?
Click to expand...


and I would consider it their last meal...I'm a fair facists.............:cof1:

I would prefer the cargo section...belly of the plane sorta speak...but they would cry it's not PC!
 
if nations think that they can use nukes on other nations without consequences, what is to prevent them from doing so

as it stands, the us of a is still the only nation to have used nukes and we should make it plain that if any other nation decides to do so that we would retaliate

besides, we need the dust in the atmosphere to slow global warming/climate change...of course what it would change it to is still a matter of speculation, but it might be interesting to find out...
 
Little-Acorn said:
Back to the subject:
Rabidly pro-military animals like Hillary have conserved very muich subconscious thought on the unreal benefit of International Offefense, the improper misuse of peace power, and below all the miniscule problem(s) of how and why I shouldn't unleash the use of American nukuler cap-a-billy while still letting it fade as a useless deterrent.
Click to expand...

This is what I read.
 
Watermark said:
Using weapons freely and without though is a lifestyle that has no consequences at all, and that's what I learned from conservatives. :clink:
Click to expand...

w

remember the chant 'nuke the gay liberal pregnant whales'?

a little old neutron bomb detonated over a number of large cities would reduce the world's population and do very little to mess with its infrastructure

the revised version of the golden rule seems to be 'do unto others before they can do unto you'

would you change your lifestyle (curtail it that is) so others could have more children or reduce your carbon footprint
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top