Hillary should be in Jail....Huffington Post.

Nomad said:
Like Comey said... THERE IS NO LEGAL PRECEDENT FOR PROSECUTING WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF INTENT TO COMMIT A CRIME OR HARM THE US GOVT.

You dopes need to try to wrap your little brains around that.
Click to expand...

And once Comey is relieved of his duties, who's going to protect Hillary then? :D
 
Nomad said:
Like Comey said... THERE IS NO LEGAL PRECEDENT FOR PROSECUTING WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF INTENT TO COMMIT A CRIME OR HARM THE US GOVT.

You dopes need to try to wrap your little brains around that.
Click to expand...

Perhaps none of you read the article or if you did, didn't understand it.....and its on Huffington, the liberal rag that you pinheads love....your "go to" site....

The whole point is the double standard of justice in this country.....Hillary is too big and too rich to charge with this crime.....as was her husband, Slick.

While the peons, the poor, the nobodies, go to jail for lesser crimes that what Hillary did.....its no wonder the common folk are pissed off.....they're finally getting it,

but it seems far over the heads of JPP posters to get it.....NO INTENT ?.....thats laughable....try it if you ever have a run in with the law.....
 
NOVA said:
Perhaps none of you read the article or if you did, didn't understand it.....and its on Huffington, the liberal rag that you pinheads love....your "go to" site....

The whole point is the double standard of justice in this country.....Hillary is too big and too rich to charge with this crime.....as was her husband, Slick.

While the peons, the poor, the nobodies, go to jail for lesser crimes that what Hillary did.....its no wonder the common folk are pissed off.....they're finally getting it,

but it seems far over the heads of JPP posters to get it.....
Click to expand...

icq_smiley_026.gif
 
Nomad said:
Like Comey said... THERE IS NO LEGAL PRECEDENT FOR PROSECUTING WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF INTENT TO COMMIT A CRIME OR HARM THE US GOVT.

You dopes need to try to wrap your little brains around that.
Click to expand...

So intent to line your own pockets is OK.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
The Obama administration has been ruthless with whistleblowers, throwing the book at Chelsea Manning and destroying the career of Thomas Drake. John Kiriakou received a 30 month sentence for leaking details about the CIA’s torture program. There are many other cases.

what say you, liberals?
Click to expand...

Nothing to see.
 
Nomad said:
Fuck you Dumberthanshit.

Slump is guilty of CRIMINAL FRAUD and very likely MULTIPLE SEXUAL ASSAULTS, but the dregs of society like you just ignore the fuck out of that.

ES&D.
Click to expand...

15181292_10155313975449881_5197239985793812704_n.jpg
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the hypocrisy of libs is astounding. that you would IGNORE hillarys misuse of CLASSIFIED material, but want to impeach trump on mere allegations of putin hacking the DNC........astounding
Click to expand...

Not astounding. Predictably boring and ordinary.

It.is.the.way.now.

Snowflakes are impermanent.

Drips.really
 
NOVA said:
Perhaps none of you read the article or if you did, didn't understand it.....and its on Huffington, the liberal rag that you pinheads love....your "go to" site....

The whole point is the double standard of justice in this country.....Hillary is too big and too rich to charge with this crime.....as was her husband, Slick.

While the peons, the poor, the nobodies, go to jail for lesser crimes that what Hillary did.....its no wonder the common folk are pissed off.....they're finally getting it,

but it seems far over the heads of JPP posters to get it.....NO INTENT ?.....thats laughable....try it if you ever have a run in with the law.....
Click to expand...

Idiot.

Look up the term LEGAL PRECEDENT and how it applies to criminal prosecution.

Historically, legal decisions in similar cases in which prosecution and conviction were present, have always involved the element of CRIMINAL INTENT TO CAUSE HARM TO THE US.

The FBI investigation found NO CRIMINAL INTENT.

Cry like little bitches until your dry up and die, but there was NO INTENT by Hillary Clinton to damage the US or its national security. Ergo, NO CRIME. No crime = NO PROSECUTION.

Fucking drool dribblers.
 
Nomad said:
Idiot.

Look up the term LEGAL PRECEDENT and how it applies to criminal prosecution.

Historically, legal decisions in similar cases in which prosecution and conviction were present, have always involved the element of CRIMINAL INTENT TO CAUSE HARM TO THE US.

The FBI investigation found NO CRIMINAL INTENT.

Cry like little bitches until your dry up and die, but there was NO INTENT by Hillary Clinton to damage the US or its national security. Ergo, NO CRIME. No crime = NO PROSECUTION.

Fucking drool dribblers.
Click to expand...
No charges have been filed and thus she is open to charges at any time. You are presuming guilt or innocence, which is a different question

Thing1 said:
Hillary?

You mean that lady who won the popular vote?
Click to expand...
I laughed.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
But...but...but, didn't you see where he said "...very likely..."

:facepalm:
Click to expand...

He said that about sexual assault, but he said he IS guilty of criminal fraud. Lefties on JPP lie everyday about Trump and then complain when Trump lies.

Just look at Bukkkle who keeps posting the pee story that has be soundly debunked. I think he wants to be pee'd on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top