Hillary Clinton’s email story continues to get harder and harder to believe

anatta said:
there are plenty of stories -the problem is they come out in batches, while the press only covers a small segment of the total
releases ,and the political back and forth.

Nobody does a comprehensive explanation/timelineof events as well as the politics - so readers are not all on the same page
when they see an article..


https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...78b0bc-3d3c-11e6-a66f-aa6c1883b6b1_story.html
One series of documents requested by Citizens United and then published by ABC News and other news organizations appears to show that Clinton’s top staff intervened to appoint a Democratic donor to a sensitive arms control advisory panel even though the donor, a Chicago securities trader, had no experience in the field.
Click to expand...
No one cares.
 
anatta said:
more's the pity. This is a lying rogue candidate, who used influence peddling to promote a campaign contributor to a national security advisory post he is utterly unqualified for..and that's all you can say??
Click to expand...

Good job Brownie.
Fucking moron.
No one cars.
 
anatta said:
it's true. it's a straightforward quid pro quo. are Americans so brain dead now we are blasé about corruption in our face?

Clinton donor received top spot on State Department intel board
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/10/politics/hillary-clinton-donor-rajiv-fernando/

A major political donor to the Clintons and other top Democrats was selected by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to serve on a key State Department intelligence board in 2011, despite having no clear background in the area, according to emails released this week..
Click to expand...

This isn't news you idiot.
We all know already.
The point is no one cares.
Can you say James Watt?
Fucking idiot.
 
While she testified that she did most of her email work on the official account, she said that she and Mrs. Clinton used the private server for some government business, as well, especially while traveling abroad.
Ms. Abedin said repeatedly that she gave no thought during her time at the State Department as to how the use of the private email server might affect requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act.

Ms. Abedin suggested to Mrs. Clinton that she should have a separate BlackBerry for work or post her personal address so that others in the department beyond her inner circle would know how to reach her in the future. In the end, both alternatives were rejected.

Ms. Abedin said repeatedly that she could not recall specific details about Mrs. Clinton’s email practices and said she was unaware of most of the technical matters involved. She also acknowledged that she refused to speak with the inspector general for its investigation – “on the advice of my attorneys.”

Ms. Abedin, like Mrs. Clinton and others, said she assumed that the use of a private email was allowed, even though the inspector general’s report concluded that no permission was ever sought and it would have been turned down if it had.

Asked why neither she nor other aides to Mrs. Clinton mentioned the private server to State Department officials in charge of preserving documents, she described it as an oversight.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/30/u...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

testimony this week
 
Rune said:
Do you understand that no one gives a fuck?
That this is not news, certainly not newsworthy?
Finally, for your edification, Signalman Kenneth was indeef banned for posting copy-pasta without comment.
Click to expand...

I notice that you never whined like this when Libtard Kenneth posted crap that served your beliefs...
 
cawacko said:
Be honest, is there a love triangle here? There are two different boards where you literally stalk this guy. Either someone has offered you money to tell him to F off after every post he makes or there is something of the heart in play here.
Click to expand...

DUNE THE STALKER LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
 
Anyone who actually believes Crooked Hillary's story as it pertains to her emails is either

a) A complete buffoon
b) A partisan hack that will forgive the Clintons anything (they have already forgiven rape allegations)
c) Both
 
I never believed the Hildebeast's story about her e-mails.

She thought she was above the rules.

Her performances as a Senator and as SoS were mediocre at best and inept at worst.

Unfortunately, her opponent is just as bad.
 
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...nch-should-have-steered-clear-of-bill-clinton
A Democratic senator said Thursday that Attorney General Loretta Lynch should not have held a private meeting with former President Bill Clinton
this week.
"I don't think it sends the right signal. I think she should have steered clear even of a brief, casual, social meeting with the former president," Sen. Chris Coons

Coons said he has been "impressed" by Lynch and her work since taking over the helm of the Justice Department last year, despite her meeting with Clinton.
"She has generally shown excellent judgment and strong leadership of the department, and I'm convinced that she is an independent attorney general," he said.

Lynch raised eyebrows when news emerged Wednesday that the attorney general, who is overseeing the investigation into Hillary Clinton
's use of a personal server while secretary of State, met with Bill Clinton.

Lynch said the pair did not discuss the Clinton email investigation or the House Benghazi panel's investigation, which was released the following day
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top