Hillary Clinton, Sorest Loser in History...........LOL poor baby

[iolo]

Our founders knew better than to create a direct democracy.

Yes - they needed to keep their slaves.

 

[iolo]

LOL
Whatever you want to tell yourself.

Hillary lost because people were sick of her. All the media in the world couldn't get her elected. Screaming that Trump was a rapist, a racist, and misogynist couldn't keep the braindead republitards from voting for him.

Hillary lost because she sucked and because the typical republican voter put party over common sense and voted for a know-nothing neophyte.

Russia had very little effect and the system is the same as it ever was.

Get a grip.

She didn't lose, as you know. You get a bloody grip. Russia clearly decided the election to avoid democratic decisions.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Yes - they needed to keep their slaves.

They weren't the only ones!

http://www.wales.ac.uk/en/NewsandEvents/News/Press/SlaveWales.aspx

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

 

[CFM]

She didn't lose, as you know. You get a bloody grip. Russia clearly decided the election to avoid democratic decisions.

When she didn't get to 270 electoral votes and her opponent did, she lost.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Russia clearly decided the election to avoid democratic decisions.

thank goodness they made the right choice......

 

[CFM]

Yes - they needed to keep their slaves.

Is that why the leftists today want to create a socialist system. Is it to keep the descendants of the black slaves on the plantation doing their bidding? Lyndon Johnson said he have them voting Democratic for 200 years and damn if they haven't obliged.

 

[GazzaQueen]

And the free-falling Democratic Party lets her come waddling from inglorious defeat and continue to lead them.