Hillary Clinton facing 1-10 years; Likely to Be Indicted Early May

Remember when Conservatives were saying that HRC was going to be indicted over the Rose Law Firm billing records?

Its the same old song on repeat since 1992. The name of the scandal changes when the people get fed up with the old name, but the argument stays the same.
 
Yes,exactly, she kept her communications secure when State couldn't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy#Server_security_and_hacking_attempts

Security experts such as Chris Soghoian believe that emails to and from Clinton may have been at risk of hacking and foreign surveillance.[41] Marc Maiffret, a cybersecurity expert, said that the server had "amateur hour" vulnerabilities.[42] For the first two months after Clinton was appointed Secretary of State and began accessing mail on the server through her Blackberry, transmissions to and from the server were apparently not encrypted. On March 29, 2009 a “digital certificate" was obtained which would have permitted HTTPS encryption.[1]

Former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Michael T. Flynn,[43] former United States Secretary of Defense Robert Gates,[44][45] and former deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency Michael Morell[46][47] have said that it is likely that foreign governments were able to access the information on Clinton's server. Michael Hayden, former Director of the National Security Agency, Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency said "I would lose all respect for a whole bunch of foreign intelligence agencies if they weren't sitting back, paging through the emails."[48]

Clinton's server was configured to allow users to connect openly from the Internet and control it remotely using Microsoft's Remote Desktop Services.[42][49] It is known that hackers in Russia were aware of Clinton's non-public email address as early as 2011.[50] Server records also show that, using a computer in Serbia, a hacker had scanned Clinton's Chappaqua server at least twice, in August and in December 2012. It was unclear whether the hacker knew the server belonged to Clinton, although it did identify itself as providing email services for clintonemail.com.[42] During 2014, Clinton's server was the target of repeated intrusions originating in Germany, China, and South Korea. Threat monitoring software on the server blocked at least five such attempts. The software was installed in October 2013, and for three months prior to that, no such software had been installed.[51][52]


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...erver-hacked-china-south-korea-germany-214546
The last batch of Clinton's emails released by the State Department under a court order in a Freedom of Information Act suit showed that Clinton received at least five emails from hackers linked to Russia. If Clinton opened attachments in the emails, her account and server could have been vulnerable to hacking, although it is unclear if she did so.

POLITICO reported last week that there were likely many more so-called phishing messages sent to Clinton during her four years as secretary, but virtually all those messages appear to have been deemed "personal" by Clinton's attorneys and deleted, although the FBI is reportedly making progress recovering some or all of the messages from tech firms that worked on Clinton's server......

....Clinton's representatives purchased SECNAP's threat monitoring device in June of 2013 but does not appear to have been activated until October 2013. A Clinton representative seemed to be aware of the issue, according to an email quoted in the letter:

“We really really need to do this,” the internal Aug. 19, 2013 email reads. “We are left in a bad state… We want to add in this extra security. We are paying for it and no[t] using the security.”
 
Remember when Conservatives were saying that HRC was going to be indicted over the Rose Law Firm billing records?

Its the same old song on repeat since 1992. The name of the scandal changes when the people get fed up with the old name, but the argument stays the same.

Yep.
 
Id love to know the number of tax dollars spent investigating HRC over the last 25 years.

She has never once been indicted or charged with a crime.
 
Remember when Conservatives were saying that HRC was going to be indicted over the Rose Law Firm billing records?

Its the same old song on repeat since 1992. The name of the scandal changes when the people get fed up with the old name, but the argument stays the same.

So you think it is perfectly fine for a Secretary of State to keep 30-40,000 government emails on a private server in her house? You take partisan hackery to a new level.
 
Remember when Conservatives were saying that HRC was going to be indicted over the Rose Law Firm billing records?

Its the same old song on repeat since 1992. The name of the scandal changes when the people get fed up with the old name, but the argument stays the same.

indicted?......no......did you just make that up?.....
 
So you think it is perfectly fine for a Secretary of State to keep 30-40,000 government emails on a private server in her house? You take partisan hackery to a new level.

No, its not perfectly fine, I have said so. It does not warrant millions of dollars worth of investigating.
 
She could teach Trump a few tricks, that's for sure!

What tricks are those, do you believe a man such as Trump, who is a wheeler, dealer doesn't know all the tricks, for being a man of the world, you sure are naïve at times.

Trump just outright lies and doesn't care, I think it is funny you think he isn't corrupt.

Trump does not feel constrained by the rules of politics and he doesn't even understand mechanics of our government, to me he is inherently more dangerous than Clinton.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy#Server_security_and_hacking_attempts

Security experts such as Chris Soghoian believe that emails to and from Clinton may have been at risk of hacking and foreign surveillance.[41] Marc Maiffret, a cybersecurity expert, said that the server had "amateur hour" vulnerabilities.[42] For the first two months after Clinton was appointed Secretary of State and began accessing mail on the server through her Blackberry, transmissions to and from the server were apparently not encrypted. On March 29, 2009 a “digital certificate" was obtained which would have permitted HTTPS encryption.[1]

Former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Michael T. Flynn,[43] former United States Secretary of Defense Robert Gates,[44][45] and former deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency Michael Morell[46][47] have said that it is likely that foreign governments were able to access the information on Clinton's server. Michael Hayden, former Director of the National Security Agency, Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency said "I would lose all respect for a whole bunch of foreign intelligence agencies if they weren't sitting back, paging through the emails."[48]

Clinton's server was configured to allow users to connect openly from the Internet and control it remotely using Microsoft's Remote Desktop Services.[42][49] It is known that hackers in Russia were aware of Clinton's non-public email address as early as 2011.[50] Server records also show that, using a computer in Serbia, a hacker had scanned Clinton's Chappaqua server at least twice, in August and in December 2012. It was unclear whether the hacker knew the server belonged to Clinton, although it did identify itself as providing email services for clintonemail.com.[42] During 2014, Clinton's server was the target of repeated intrusions originating in Germany, China, and South Korea. Threat monitoring software on the server blocked at least five such attempts. The software was installed in October 2013, and for three months prior to that, no such software had been installed.[51][52]


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...erver-hacked-china-south-korea-germany-214546
The last batch of Clinton's emails released by the State Department under a court order in a Freedom of Information Act suit showed that Clinton received at least five emails from hackers linked to Russia. If Clinton opened attachments in the emails, her account and server could have been vulnerable to hacking, although it is unclear if she did so.

POLITICO reported last week that there were likely many more so-called phishing messages sent to Clinton during her four years as secretary, but virtually all those messages appear to have been deemed "personal" by Clinton's attorneys and deleted, although the FBI is reportedly making progress recovering some or all of the messages from tech firms that worked on Clinton's server......

....Clinton's representatives purchased SECNAP's threat monitoring device in June of 2013 but does not appear to have been activated until October 2013. A Clinton representative seemed to be aware of the issue, according to an email quoted in the letter:

“We really really need to do this,” the internal Aug. 19, 2013 email reads. “We are left in a bad state… We want to add in this extra security. We are paying for it and no[t] using the security.”

More ifs could.haves may.have.
Whatever dude no proof of any data loss.
 
What tricks are those, do you believe a man such as Trump, who is a wheeler, dealer doesn't know all the tricks, for being a man of the world, you sure are naïve at times.

Trump just outright lies and doesn't care, I think it is funny you think he isn't corrupt.

Trump does not feel constrained by the rules of politics and he doesn't even understand mechanics of our government, to me he is inherently more dangerous than Clinton.

Didn't say he wasn't, but I'll bet that if it were Trump that had a private server you would be going apeshit about it.
 
It's already the middle of May. If anything demonstrates the vast number of semi-literate retards in the GOP base it is stuff like this. You take a minor "whoops my bad" that only some partisan right wing hacks give a rats ass about and by telling yourself over and over and over again that she broke the law and is going to jail despite that this has gone on interminably, millions of dollars of tax payer money utterly wasted, no evidence to support a crime, other than ones invented whole cloth, and you convince yourself with absolute certainty that Clinton will be indicted in early May when it's already the middle of May. This is solid evidence that you're all simply retards.

This is just White Water two and the only people you retards are convincing is other retards.

i dont know the legalities of all this stuff, but clinton setting up her own separate email server is shady as shit. period. Not only is it more vulnerable to attacks/less secure, but it shows that she wants to have her own loopholes and be outside the scope of government oversight. it should not be defended.
 
Back
Top