Hillary cites RFK assassination in explaining why she's still in race

B

BRUTALITOPS

on indefiniate mod break
Contributor
Hillary Clinton today cited the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy during the 1968 presidential campaign to explain why she was remaining in the race despite long odds.

"We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California," Clinton told the editorial board of a South Dakota newspaper. " I don't understand it," Clinton added, alluding to the calls for her to quit.

Clinton made the statement after pointing out that her husband didn't lock up the nomination until June of 1992, trying to point out that, by past history, it's not late in the campaign. (See a clip of the interview here.)
Click to expand...

http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonat...ion_in_explaining_why_shes_still_in_race.html
 
Milagro said:
This is 2016 not 2008, just thought you ought to know!
Click to expand...

I suspect that perhaps the point of the thread is to question whether Hillary may have once said something that was interpreted by the left as an invitation to assassinate her political opponent.......
 
Seahawk said:
She apologized and her comments are nothing like Trump's.
Click to expand...

her comments left no doubt about what she meant.....Trumps words are spun into something he wasn't talking about....ie killing anybody....

its manufactured bullshit like most of what the Dems have been whining about for a month.....mis characterizing his words to mean something totally different

than what he actually meant......
 
Seahawk said:
She didn't insinuate anyone assassinate Obama, she was referencing his death threats.
Click to expand...

Really ?.....well Trump was referencing the power of the voting block that the 2nd amendment voters represent.....

but Dimdems didn't present it anything like that did they....and of course the liberal media gives that bullshit legs and it stays in the news for days....
 
NOVA said:
Really ?.....well Trump was referencing the power of the voting block that the 2nd amendment voters represent.....

but Dimdems didn't present it anything like that did they....
Click to expand...

I'm not really sure what he meant, but it would not surprise me if he meant the worst. Like I said, his words were poor at best. A CIC shouldn't even need to have his words clarified like that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top